TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Random, non-adhesive, won't stick damn it, thread of randomness
Pages (399): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 »


Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 21:18:

And it's not excuses, it's just pointing out a fact that Alabama's team is comprised of a bunch of dumb animals who probably can't even spell "Alabama". Notre Dame has one of the most talented teams in the country. Just because they weren't given the opportunity to play SEC teams doesn't mean they're not every bit as good. They beat USC (yes they didn't have their starting QB, but the rest of their team is just, if not more talented than Bama).

All of these people claiming ND doesn't deserve to be in the championship because they didn't play any SEC teams are morons, and mostly SEC fans. Oh hey!


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-11-2012 21:24:

quote:
Originally posted by srussell0018
They beat USC (yes they didn't have their starting QB, but the rest of their team is just, if not more talented than Bama).


LOL

Come on, man. You would have had better luck convincing me using Notre Dame's wins against Stanford or Oklahoma.

USC???

It's obvious you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Must be trolling, now.

EDIT:

And I never said they shouldn't be in the title game. What I said is they have zero chance of winning. Your comments about Alabama having "animals" that can only play football and play it well proves that point, somewhat.

Another dream shattered. Another hope crushed. Hey, but at least they made it.


Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 21:37:

USC has WAY more talent than Florida. I don't think anybody who knew anything about either team would disagree with that. Barkley or not, they're a better team than anyone gives them credit for, and with the recruiting restrictions placed on them, that's not really surprising. Regardless, their whole season was marred by penalties essentially, and if you had followed it at all, you'd know that.

I'm assuming you didn't watch the ND/USC game, because they went into this in great detail.

Regardless, ND is better than UF, and you're gay.

I don't think there's a ranking higher than #1, but get back to me if you find one.


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-11-2012 21:47:

So how does Notre Dame's win against a team "marred by penalties" validate your point that they are better than Alabama?

Like I said, I think their wins against Stanford and Oklahoma are more impressive, if you're going to use that argument.

USC has more talent than Florida on the offensive side of the ball, but defensively it's NOT EVEN CLOSE.

With that said and Barkley not playing against Notre Dame - the catalyst for this supposed offensive juggerknot - that score was too close to prove any point to me that they're a great team.

Good? Yes.

Great? Not even close.

They almost let a freshman beat them FFS.

Alabama lost one game and it happened to be against the eventual Heisman Trophy winner. And they lost it themselves at that, with a costly turnover on the goal line at the end of the game.


Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 21:53:

quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
Alabama lost one game and it happened to be against the eventual Heisman Trophy winner. And they lost it themselves at that, with a costly turnover on the goal line at the end of the game.



Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 21:56:

You don't have the best red zone defense, the best linebacker in the country, and one of the most explosive offenses in the country by being "good, but not great."

USC had the ball on the 1 yard line 1st and goal towards the end of their game and ND stopped them on 7 plays in a row.

But they're just okay.


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-11-2012 22:01:

We can go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about this.

I guess we'll just have to wait until next month to find out.

Care to wager?


Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 22:07:

I'll wager you 5 billion internet dollars


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-11-2012 22:14:

Notre Dame wins and I'll never post on TA again.

Alabama wins and you have to use a Tim Tebow picture of my choosing as your avatar for a year.


Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 22:22:

I don't care if you post on TA again. If ND wins, you have to make your avatar a picture of you wearing a dress holding a sign that says "I'm a little teapot."


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-11-2012 23:02:

The essay idea was better.


Posted by srussell0018 on Dec-11-2012 23:16:

The essay it is then. 1000 words on why Notre Dame is the finest educational institution in all of the land, and why intelligence and strategy trump blackness 1/10 times.


Posted by LAdazeNYnights on Dec-12-2012 03:41:

Teh gays

So I'm having a minor crisis of conscience or whatever-
A gay friend of my girlfriends is visiting her for about a week as of Thursday - she just sprang this on me today - and he'll be staying in her room, sharing her bed with her.
I don't really like the idea of any guy, straight or gay, in my gfs bed, seeing her undress before bed/in the morning, etc etc etc.
In fact I think it fucking sucks.

Is this unreasonable?
What do?


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Dec-12-2012 03:49:

Respect her wishes for her own personal boundaries. You don't have to like it, but you need to accept that it's what she is comfortable with; If you are fundamentally uncomfortable with her decisions, she is perhaps not the type of woman for you, and you should question your relationship with her further; chiefly by confronting her with your concerns, yourself.


Posted by wienerschnitzel on Dec-12-2012 03:53:

I'm straight and I wouldn't sleep in bed with any of my gf's unless there really was no other options... I don't think you're being unreasonable? But if she thinks it is fine I agree with Hal, you may want to decide if you guys really are on the same page?


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-12-2012 04:03:

There's no way I'm letting another guy sleep in the same bed as my girl.

You better get in that bed instead and tell that mofo to sleep on the floor next to you.


Posted by LAdazeNYnights on Dec-12-2012 04:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Respect her wishes for her own personal boundaries. You don't have to like it, but you need to accept that it's what she is comfortable with; If you are fundamentally uncomfortable with her decisions, she is perhaps not the type of woman for you, and you should question your relationship with her further; chiefly by confronting her with your concerns, yourself.


in re: 'confronting her with your concerns' --- i suggested that i was somewhat torn on that and that's why i wanted some advice from you guys.

i like your response tho in that you took a pretty hard line on it (being the dutiful married man that you are) and there's certainly a good deal of insight therein.

i wouldn't really say that i'm 'fundamentally uncomfortable with her decisions' - this is the first instance of something like this where i'm essentially 'wtf??' / taken aback by it.

wiener - it's a gay guy, not girl. And regarding other options - she made it seem like there were a few other friends places he could have stayed at.

obviously i just don't like it. i don't like being in this sort of situation because it makes me hate myself - but i don't think it's the situation i would ever put someone in so it also makes me somewhat mad


Posted by LAdazeNYnights on Dec-12-2012 04:08:

quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
There's no way I'm letting another guy sleep in the same bed as my girl.

You better get in that bed instead and tell that mofo to sleep on the floor next to you.


lol and this is the hard line answer from the other side.
i fucking love it.

i'm erring more towards hal's approach, but i do agree with you in that there's no way i'm letting another guy sleep in the same bed as my girl...that pretty much how i feel.
but i also feel steamrolled because, since it's already decided, i either have to just deal with it and be sad, get into a fight and be really upset and then sad, or tell her to change it and then i look like an ass hole. i feel like i've already lost


Posted by wienerschnitzel on Dec-12-2012 04:15:

quote:
Originally posted by LAdazeNYnights
in re: 'confronting her with your concerns' --- i suggested that i was somewhat torn on that and that's why i wanted some advice from you guys.

i like your response tho in that you took a pretty hard line on it (being the dutiful married man that you are) and there's certainly a good deal of insight therein.

i wouldn't really say that i'm 'fundamentally uncomfortable with her decisions' - this is the first instance of something like this where i'm essentially 'wtf??' / taken aback by it.

wiener - it's a gay guy, not girl. And regarding other options - she made it seem like there were a few other friends places he could have stayed at.

obviously i just don't like it. i don't like being in this sort of situation because it makes me hate myself - but i don't think it's the situation i would ever put someone in so it also makes me somewhat mad


Lol I know it's a guy... That's my point. Lol. He can't sleep on a couch? I have an inflatable mattress I pull out if people stay?


Posted by LAdazeNYnights on Dec-12-2012 04:18:

quote:
Originally posted by wienerschnitzel
Lol I know it's a guy... That's my point. Lol. He can't sleep on a couch? I have an inflatable mattress I pull out if people stay?


Somebody is temporarily living in their living room
mehh


Posted by Lira on Dec-12-2012 04:19:

Do you know if she would be okay with you sharing your bed with a lesbian friend for a week?

First you need to know if the same rules apply to both of you. If she's cool with you sleeping next to an actual lesbian, then it may show you've got different mindsets. If, however, she believes she's entitled to do whatever she wants, yet you can't pretend lesbians are just like blokes (including the pointless awkwardness when you get naked in front of one), then that should raise a red flag.

Edit: And in the latter case, you definitely don't lose. Specially if you ditch her and get a fake lesbian.


Posted by OrangestO on Dec-12-2012 04:22:

quote:
Originally posted by LAdazeNYnights
lol and this is the hard line answer from the other side.
i fucking love it.

i'm erring more towards hal's approach, but i do agree with you in that there's no way i'm letting another guy sleep in the same bed as my girl...that pretty much how i feel.
but i also feel steamrolled because, since it's already decided, i either have to just deal with it and be sad, get into a fight and be really upset and then sad, or tell her to change it and then i look like an ass hole. i feel like i've already lost


If it was decided between the two of them without your feelings being taken into account then that's bullshit to begin with. Just because you're the guy doesn't mean you don't have feelings that should be seriously considered, especially when it involves something like this.

Either she likes/loves (not sure what stage of the relationship you're in) you enough to compromise or she doesn't. Letting it bother you and ignoring it is the worst thing you can do, though. Putting it on the table will not only make you feel better internally, but it will also test your relationship and let you know where you stand with her.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Dec-12-2012 04:30:

quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
If it was decided between the two of them without your feelings being taken into account then that's bullshit to begin with.


This is very true. None of us are qualified to appraise the status of your relationship with her, but if you've already said your piece and she still ignores you... well, it's either time for you to:

Take a stand.

Take a seat.

Don't get me wrong, I am by no means proposing machismo in any way, but you need to assert to her that you are bothered by it, and if she is not in any way affected by your feelings on the matter... well... she's perhaps not someone you should continue to care about.

Or maybe you do care about her, and you should just get past this because it's obviously dumb to begin with. Why should you care? He's gay, and is not interested in her in any sexua- maybe he's bi? Oh fuck. You need to caveman this shit right now.


Posted by Lira on Dec-12-2012 04:40:

Caveman?! Is that another term for butt-pirate? How deep is he willing to go to find out whether this bloke is really gay?


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Dec-12-2012 04:44:

As deep as it takes! *snap*


Pages (399): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.