|
|
|
|
S.Clarke
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Dirty Vegas
|
|
I'd also like it if you can pm it please
|
|
Jul-13-2006 11:02
|
|
|
|
|
dJohn
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: 619
|
|
No offense to kimchi, but what makes you want to hear a mix from him rather than these other DJs with "simpler" set ups? Bigger equipment doesn't give you sort of magical fairy dust that makes you better. I'd rather hear a mix done on a simpler set up than a complex one to really hear true mixing using what you NEED, not what you have.
|
|
Jul-14-2006 01:19
|
|
|
|
|
dJohn
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: 619
|
|
Why is the DJM1000 so touted? It's not digital like the 800, nor does it have MIDI control capabilities such as the Xone 92 or DJM 800...
|
|
Jul-14-2006 16:31
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
The DJM-1000 IS digital, just like the 800.
It also has very nice effect sends/returns ideally suited for use with the EFX-1000.
It does have MIDI support, though I'm not sure how much.
Remember that the Xone 92 only has limited midi support; only a few knobs and the crossfader actually output midi signals.
But yes, it's just a big installation mixer. For big clubs it has a lot of channels and is very flexible. Not sure I'd take it over a classic rotary or not though.
quote: | Originally posted by dJohn
Why is the DJM1000 so touted? It's not digital like the 800, nor does it have MIDI control capabilities such as the Xone 92 or DJM 800... |
|
|
Jul-14-2006 16:42
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|