Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Errbody take this test so I can see if I'm retarded or not
quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
But that's the point of psychological evaluations. Whether or not you agree with how the question is posed or what it's supposed to be measuring, subjective questions are asked because they measure the system of beliefs held by the respondents. If a subsection of people hold common beliefs - beliefs that are subjective by their very nature - then testing for the presence of those subjective beliefs is valid criteria to test for. Unfortunately, we don't know whether that's the case or not.
Not really having any idea of how the test was constructed, perhaps it is as you said; based on an arbitrarily subjective frame of reference with no real bearing on any measurable trait. I don't suspect there are formal validity scales built into the test (scales which allow the surveyor to discern discrepancies that may be the result of someone putting themselves in a positive or negative light in order to skew the test result - for example) but I can't tell you, for certain, there aren't. |
in order to achieve objective results, the process of method of analysis or procedure of the analysis, has to be made as objective analysis.
if the method of analysis of observations is an objective procedure, the observations inputted that will be analyzed are analyzed for deeper objective connections, subjectivity is just the inability of the analysis to come up with objective representation of resulting observations and resulting analysis of observations.
"what society is, should not be taken for what society should be"
social normality is a method used for people who are upset at the quality of life to give up their human rights towards the freedom to question truth, to question if society stands for truth, and to question the morality of social behavior.
everyone should be made aware of the difference between responsibility of moral behavior
showing anger or being upset comes from the discontent of a situation and the results of a situation.
showing violence in expression of thoughts and feelings, is not the same as the action of expressing anger through violent actions and attempts to injure, or damage another person or the rights of another person.
quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
But that's the point. I know that Aspergers have a hard time coping with social situations. You might not be cognizant of any "rules" per se but it's easy to understand that, as a coping mechanism, some Aspergers might come up with a set of rules to try and understand other people and help guide their own behavior. This question, answered in the negative, is measuring the absence of autism. Someone with Aspergers would disagree with it. They are more likely to spend a great deal of time trying to work out rules, guidelines, et al, for social situations that neuro-typicals aren't even cognizant of. |
the world is not what it is supposed to be. the world is not perfect, and the observations of the world as imperfect compared to the idea of perfection causes the environment to cause evolution of people who seek perfection and evolution. these people are thought to have "disorders" according to the opinions of the majority who accept society to already be perfect, without anyone actually being able, thus far to even being to define the word perfection, or the world that the word perfection would bring to the world in terms of achieving perfection in the world. "disorders" are caused by societies inability to develop a proper environment towards the perfection of evolution, evolution of all life, and perfect evolution towards the perfection of the evolution of the world as perfect.
people chose to not be social active when they see no intelligence that can come out of intelligence having social interaction with stupidity.
some people know, that their intelligence will be the ridicule of stupidity by means of the ego that stupidity allows to grow to replace the intelligence that the stupidity realizes it lacks.
the mindset of society is: "if i am stupid personally, and i see that intelligence asks too much sacrifice of my personal benefit and personal pleasure, i will grow my ego, so that it is able to convince people that i am intelligent even though i know i am stupid."
" if the majority agrees with me that i am intelligent in my behavioral and thoughts and expression, it does not matter that the majority could be the consequence of stupidity, i will prove i am intelligent simply by having stupidity agree, that the majority is what makes intelligence intelligence, and no one needs any further proof"
"therefor, we will outcast the minority of intelligence as having "disorders", and thus gain power through the majority of stupidity, and stupidity does not have to deal with listening to the minority of intelligence."
intelligence is quality, not quantity. majority is quantity. the majority has no right to claim it is intelligence based on the fact that they are the majority. the majority does not have the right to claim they're way is the best way of achievement of truth in society.
the majority causes the "disorders" of the minority by creating a world that lacks the ability for evolution of intelligence and create an environment that does not obey truth, or objective reality, or natural law.
"society chooses to make society what it wasnt society to be, based on the personal pleasure benefits of allowing the ego to proscribe what intelligence is, and out-casting the few, the intelligent and the truthful, as having disorders and therefore their view of reality is not correct. society does not try to justify what is correct through objective reasoning or proof, it simply states majority = intelligence, therefore whoever can't be successful what the society considers success, we can claim they have a disorder, and ignore how they feel, think, and what they might bring forth towards the evolution of society from stupidity and into proper intelligence, and recognition of absolute truth, and observation of objective reality, how objective the reality of society actually is, and what needs to change so that the objective view of truth, becomes the objective view that the majority of society holds.
quality is not quantity, unless everything that is part of the quantity has absolute quality and perfection in the its characteristics as something of quality.
dont put shit on a stick, and call it candy.
___________________
--because God is Infinitely Simple, God can only appear to the finite mind as infinitely complex.--
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Trinity6III
Blog:
http://godthetrinity.blogspot.ca/
Productions:
http://soundcloud.com/the-trinity-iii
The Next Level:
http://soundcloud.com/dj-the-nexus
|