|
|
|
|
Joss Weatherby
Banned
Registered: May 2008
Location: The Pacific Northwest, of course
|
|
quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
The Nex 7 with 18-55mm lens is $1,200.
You also actually did say that your DSLR would return better quality images than the Sony which has twice the MP, so your whole "I never said one was better than the other in any significant way" thing is bullshit too.
That's right off of Sony's website. I'm sure you could even find it for cheaper elsewhere.
Also, I don't really understand what you're talking about with the whole size issue. I don't think it has anything to do with "not wanting to be seen with a big DSLR" it's just functionally a better design. It's more easily transportable, it's way lighter which would make it easier to hold steady when not using a tripod, and you wouldn't have to carry around a big bulky case to hold all the lenses/body/etc., you can practically carry the whole thing in a jacket pocket.
You just sound like a DSLR fanboy. |
Oh god, keep talking, please, its so much easier to get work done when you do all the arguing against yourself.
|
|
Jul-12-2013 18:51
|
|
|
|
|
Joss Weatherby
Banned
Registered: May 2008
Location: The Pacific Northwest, of course
|
|
quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
You just said the body alone is $1,200 and the lenses are $800.
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-55-210mm...ds=nex+7+lenses
There's another lens for $350.
So so far you've said the body is $1,200 by itself, and lenses are $800. I've shown you that the body WITH a lens is $1,200, and a 55-210mm lens is $350. Anything else? |
Yes, I might have mis-spoken in one place, but I also said a DSLR with a kit lens (same focal length as that one) is significantly less (Canon started putting on way better kit lenses on the Rebel the last few years). The T5i with a kit 18-55 with IS is 700-800$ and I am sure you could find it for a lot less if you dug around.
Also, showing me one lens is not "variety" lol.
I don't know why you are so adamant about this argument. I didn't criticize you, I didn't criticize anyone else, I just said that when the price in general for mirrorless cameras comes down it will beat out the consumer/entry level DSLR market easily. That hasn't happened yet, you can look at the sales, its not there, and one of the sticking points is price. I don't know why you are so keen to argue on this.
I am not even criticizing the camera, and guess what everyone, professional or otherwise will say that yes, you are going to get better quality off a larger, non-crop sensor in a DSLR, especially in low light. It is literally physics, you can't argue with it, more sensor surface = more light = better quality. Even saying this, its marginal. Mirrorless cameras take excellent photos, but they do have drawbacks compared to an SLR, same as an SLR has drawbacks to a mirrorless. They are slightly different tools, and a good photographer is going to know what tools work best for their work.
|
|
Jul-12-2013 19:51
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|