The first goal by Iginla was controversial. When i saw it, i was pretty sure it went off the top and deflected down.
The second goal for sure went in, theres no doubt about it.
Vancouver:
One goal went in, but goalie interference and should have been called.
End result:
One controversial goal by calgary, one by vancouver.
One for sure goal for calgary = real score 1-0 calgary
The series is even.
quote:
sean, btw, we let calgary win ONE game... just so we can win game 5 at HOME. i mean, we win 5-3, they win 2-1. We could have won this 8-2 but we thought we'd let you guys win a game. and like heck we want to let you calgary fans have a win at home.
and if it weren't for the kipper, calgary would stink like columbus.
haha you're a dumb ass. you talk like your on the team or something. get real, vancouver didnt LET calgary win.
and yes, if calgary didnt have mikka, we would be severely screwed.
Apr-10-2004 19:00
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
quote:
Originally posted by Dmatrox
One controversial goal by calgary, one by vancouver.
One for sure goal for calgary = real score 1-0 calgary
The series is even.
What you're overlooking is the fact that Vancouver came out flying and hit 2 posts in the first 3 minutes. The back to back goals killed our momentum and it took us until the end of the second pretty much to start playing the same way we did. Had that first goal not gone in it would have been a completely different game.
Either way, who cares, you guys won and that's all that matters right now. Frankly I was very happy with our performance, especially Cloutier's; you guys have a great goalie and he, plus a few posts, won the game for you. It's great to see our goalie keeping us in it though, and I expect Vancouver to rock it in game 3.
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
Apr-10-2004 19:33
24K
[CD-R!!!1!]
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Gangcouver, B.C.
HAHHHAHAHHAHAHA
I'm getting a good laugh out of this thread
Thanks guys!
Apr-10-2004 19:43
mmmyummybacardi
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary
who cares if vancouver came out flying and hit 2 posts? nobody will remember that when its over a win is a win stop making excuses
Apr-10-2004 20:12
Godsound
tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Calgary
hey people, could everyone just be civilized and keep their emotions low?
I know its frustrating when your team loses but, relax.
Anyways, posts dont matter.
It's not anyones fault but the Canucks that they kept hitting posts. Thats the reason Calgary won, because they were able to get shots IN the net.
But none-the-less
everyone knew it would be a good series and so far, it is exactly that.
Apr-10-2004 20:27
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
I'm well aware that posts don't matter, I was just using it as an example to show how silly Dmatrox's argument about the non-calls were.
Anyways, on to game 3!
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
Apr-10-2004 20:35
Dmatrox
something goes here?
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary
The only call i didnt like was the pushing of the goalie. Everything else was alright.
Game 3 sunday
Apr-10-2004 20:43
Godsound
tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Calgary
quote:
Originally posted by DjCommisad
sean, btw, we let calgary win ONE game... just so we can win game 5 at HOME. i mean, we win 5-3, they win 2-1. We could have won this 8-2 but we thought we'd let you guys win a game. and like heck we want to let you calgary fans have a win at home.
and if it weren't for the kipper, calgary would stink like columbus.
hhahaha maybe thats why you guys have never won the Stanley Cup. Maybe its because The Canucks LET the opponents win too many games in the playoffs. hahaha
jk
I agree though,
Kipper is the only reason why 1. calgary made the playoffs
and 2. calgary won the last game
Apr-10-2004 20:50
Thracky
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Relocated Calgarian
The ONLY non call was the Jovanovski and it was just because the refs couldn't see it.
They were clearly watching the Chris Simon thing on the Iginla goal and he was pushed into Cloutier by a vancouver player. It was pretty obvious and you can't deny it watching the replay. So don't gimme that controversial goal crap =P
Apr-10-2004 23:45
DjCommisad
slyxster
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver
i say we need to hit more. you guys (calgary) pretty much own the front of our net. i mean come on, malik is pretty big but he doesn't do crap. i've hated him all year. plus 35, so what?
AT LEAST ST LOUIS IS LOSING. hahahahahaha stlouis sucks.
I can't wait until tomorrow night.....Calgary now has the momentum in the series and you guys haven't seen anything in GM Place like the reception the Flames will have tomorrow....7 years of frustration and disappointment will be washed away by a furious apocalyptic thunder. And unfortunately, I don't think Moses plays for the Canucks...so good luck with the Sea of Red.
Apr-11-2004 03:49
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
We're 7-0-2 in our last 9 games at the Saddledome, so I'm not particularly worried about the "Sea of Red" =P Granted playoff games are different, but Calgary should be careful to not get too wrapped up in the noise and get rocked early like Vancouver did at the first home game against St. Louis last year. Can't wait for tmrw!
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
