|
Dirty cop blows load on motorist...
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DigitalPhoenix |
...and gets away with it!
llegally Park-ed
An Irvine cop ejaculates on a motorist but escapes criminal liability
By R. SCOTT MOXLEY
Thursday, February 8, 2007 - 3:00 pm
No one disputes that an on-duty Irvine police officer got an erection and ejaculated on a motorist during an early-morning traffic stop in Laguna Beach. The female driver reported it, DNA testing confirmed it and officer David Alex Park finally admitted it.
When the case went to trial, however, defense attorney Al Stokke argued that Park wasn’t responsible for making sticky all over the woman’s sweater. He insisted that she made the married patrolman make the mess—after all, she was on her way home from work as a dancer at Captain Cream Cabaret.
“She got what she wanted,” said Stokke. “She’s an overtly sexual person.”
Full article here:
http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/illegally-park-ed/26661/
To protect and serve :rolleyes: |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
| if she's a stripper, what's the problem? |
|
|
| DigitalPhoenix |
| Fixed. You may have to copy and paste |
|
|
| Taranis |
| quote: | | if she's a stripper, what's the problem? |
So strippers no longer have the right to chose who they have sex with? |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Taranis
So strippers no longer have the right to chose who they have sex with? |
/media/New Volume/Music/John O Callaghan & Kearney - Exactly (Original Mix).mp3
but they do have a right to think. kind of like that girl who worked at mcdonalds and gave a fake policeman a lapdance/blowjob as part of an investigation he was doing because the manager said someone might have stolen $20 from the cash register
edit?
2dumb2furious? |
|
|
| {b.s.e.} |
| quote: | Originally posted by Taranis
So strippers no longer have the right to chose who they have sex with? |
they never did. :wtf: |
|
|
| DigitalPhoenix |
Personally, I think the jury was not the best to have in this case:
50 and 60 year olds? c'mon. It's a bunch of old foggies with the old fashioned mentality: if she's a stripper, she's a WHORE!
In the other hand if it would have been a younger jury - let's say mid 30's or even 25, I bet you $10 bucks he would've been found guilty |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigitalPhoenix
Personally, I think the jury was not the best to have in this case:
50 and 60 year olds? c'mon. It's a bunch of old foggies with the old fashioned mentality: if she's a stripper, she's a WHORE!
In the other hand if it would have been a younger jury - let's say mid 30's or even 25 I bet you $10 bucks he would've been found guilty |
nothing wrong with being a whore. just:
1. don't be ugly
2. don't be stupid
3. don't use #2 to sue everyone
4. reassure #1, cus that's the most important |
|
|
| dj_alfi |
| lol, the american judical system is f'd up.. |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
3. don't use #2 to sue everyone
4. reassure #1, cus that's the most important |
What does poop and pee have to do with anything? :conf: |
|
|
| washout |
| hhahha that's awesome. |
|
|
|
|
