Why did current CEO of BP Tony Hayward dump approximately one-third of his BP stocks before the oil crisis? Why did Goldman Sachs dump a hefty 44% of its BP stock prior to, particularly given that Peter Sutherland was formerly CEO of both BP and Goldman Sachs at the same time? What are the odds that former Vice-President Dick Cheney’s firm Halliburton would purchase a company which “focuses on oil spill prevention and blowout response,” just weeks before the so-called ‘biggest environmental crisis’ of all time would strike?
“Workers from the rig and company officials have said that hours before the explosion, gases were leaking through the cement, which had been set in place by the oil services contractor, Halliburton. Investigators have said these leaks were the likely cause of the explosion,” reported the Times.
Ok, but why would the CEO hold onto 2/3 of his stocks?
Why would Goldman Sachs hold 56% of their stocks?
And most importantly, why would BP cause a spill? What does the company have to gain?
ModernNosferatu
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
You're a ing ignoramus.
Your insults are old. If you disagree, then point out facts or debate the subject but just to call people names with curse words in them is childish. Name calling is in fact childish.
If you have a history of arguing with this TA member over issues then I could very well understand your comment but so far I just see it over and over again to different TA members.
You're a f*cking moron
You're a f*cking ignoramus
You're a f*cking idiot
And stop playing devils advocate as well, that too is getting old.
Halcyon+On+On
I'm actually going to have to agree.
idoru, this aggression will not stand.
You're becoming as abrasive as Fledz these days, and that guy's a regular brillo pad of abuse.
Comrade Stalin
Anyone who cites Alex Jones or Prison-planet doesn't deserve a debate. They've already proved they believe in bull.
ModernNosferatu
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Anyone who cites Alex Jones or Prison-planet doesn't deserve a debate. They've already proved they believe in bull.
I see your point but maybe they need to be informed, I mean if your going to post anyway, why not inform the person instead of insulting.
If there is a past history between people then I'm all for the insulting but I think informing would be better than insulting.
Sunsnail
:stongue:
this is the worst logic i've ever seen.
Nrg2Nfinit
lol dumbass of the year post. Perhaps Eddie zellers might back you up, but no sympathy from my end.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by ModernNosferatu
I see your point but maybe they need to be informed, I mean if your going to post anyway, why not inform the person instead of insulting.
If there is a past history between people then I'm all for the insulting but I think informing would be better than insulting.
Of course there is a history of iTranscendence tendencies to copy and paste any and every conspiracy theory that comes his way.
