A 09/11 Precursor Timeline
|
View this Thread in Original format
Fir3start3r |
No comment other than wow...
This guy did some research...
Checkit |
|
|
Maaz |
Blimey, that's huge! (and colourful :D ) |
|
|
fastmp3 |
wow i'd like to read it all |
|
|
Xavier |
quote: | October, 1980: Salem bin Laden, Osama's oldest brother, is later described by a French secret intelligence report as one of the two closest friends of Saudi Arabia's King Fahd. As such, he often performs important missions for Saudi Arabia. The French report speculates that he is somehow involved in secret Paris meetings between US and Iranian emissaries this month. Frontline, which published the French report, notes that such meetings have never been confirmed. Rumors of these meetings have been called the "October Surprise" and some have speculated Bush Sr. negotiated in these meetings a delay to the release of the US hostages in Iran, thus helping Reagan and Bush win the Presidency. All of this is highly speculative, but if the French report is correct, it points to a long-standing connection of highly illegal behavior between the Bush and bin Laden families. |
eeek! |
|
|
Maaz |
I've just read Xavier's post... hey, fir3stast3r, is this information really reliable!? |
|
|
infinity HiGH |
Ok, so do I just start reading from like the very top? All those colours, and seperations are throwing my slow brain off
:conf: :conf: |
|
|
jdat |
quote: | Originally posted by Xavier
eeek! |
Bush owns stocks in firm that are bin laden linked
after the attacks of september 11 , all the bin laden relatives and close friends, and many other Saudi Arabians of top level where flown out of the country ( usa ) in private planes for their own security( they did it themselves , their appears to be no governement linkage into this; yet the fact is they were still allowed to fly despite NO FLYING in usa was allowed for a certain time )
and many other things that cannot come to my mind right now
or so it seems :confused:
I had my sources somewhere, I lost them , I don't ask you to believe me but I know this is true.
the day JFK was elected ( or maybe other president I forget ) USA hostages were released by Iranians who been held them for a long time ( don't tell me there was NO link whatsoever there pffffff )
usa politics playing with the *devils side* ( well you understand what I mean , please no flamer wars about that * devils side * ) ( they also played alot with russia during cold war and bla
bla
bla ) |
|
|
infinity HiGH |
quote: | Originally posted by jdat
Bush owns stocks in firm that are bin laden linked
after the attacks of september 11 , all the bin laden relatives and close friends, and many other Saudi Arabians of top level where flown out of the country ( usa ) in private planes for their own security( they did it themselves , their appears to be no governement linkage into this; yet the fact is they were still allowed to fly despite NO FLYING in usa was allowed for a certain time )
and many other things that cannot come to my mind right now
or so it seems :confused:
I had my sources somewhere, I lost them , I don't ask you to believe me but I know this is true.
the day JFK was elected ( or maybe other president I forget ) USA hostages were released by Iranians who been held them for a long time ( don't tell me there was NO link whatsoever there pffffff )
usa politics playing with the *devils side* ( well you understand what I mean , please no flamer wars about that * devils side * ) ( they also played alot with russia during cold war and bla
bla
bla ) |
hehe, i'm not gonna say that it isn't true. Me and my friend have nice talks about these conspiracies and stuff like that, I'm not gonna say how he knows these things, but he does...heh. Oh man, I"m definately printing out this that site, I'll have something to read for the next few days, and props to the dude that wrote it...lol
And the states didnt play with russia...other way around, Russia played with the States (and Britian) and used them as their bitches. |
|
|
infinity HiGH |
quote: | January 15, 2000: Shortly after the secret al-Qaeda meeting in Malaysia, the CIA tracks two of the future 9/11 hijackers from that meeting, Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar, as they fly to Los Angeles [MSNBC, 12/11/01] The CIA does nothing with this information, neither telling the INS, which could have turned them away at the border, nor notifying the FBI, which could have covertly tracked them to find out their mission. Instead, for the next year and nine months Alhazmi and Almihdhar live openly in the US, using their real names right until 9/11. [Newsweek, 6/10/02] Had they done some digging, they could have learned that for much of 1999 these two were living in San Diego with 9/11 hijacker Hani Hanjour, who was getting a pilot's license. In fact, it would appear that a neighbor filed this strange report back then: "A week ago, I was coming home between 12 and 1 a.m. from a club. I saw a limo pick them up. It wasn't the first time. In this neighborhood you notice stuff like that. In the past couple of months, I have seen this happen at least two or three times." [Time, 9/24/01] Who did she report this to, and what could these late night limousine rides possibly mean? Note that until June, 2002, the CIA claimed they first learned about these two in August, 2001. [New York Times, 6/3/02] |
Thats just......gut-wrenching. Really shows how efficient the CIA is.
*feels sorry for every person living in the Great US of A* :(:(:( |
|
|
ali92 |
quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
No comment other than wow...
This guy did some research...
Checkit |
When I saw this, I got even MORE angrier when I strted reading into it. It seems like that all of the info about the attack was RIGHT UNDER THEIR NOSES! Something that REALLY stood out for me was "September 6, 2001: Antoinette DiLorenzo, teaching English to a class of Pakistani immigrants, asks a student gazing out the window, "What are you looking at?" The student points towards the WTC, and says: "Do you see those two buildings? They won't be standing there next week." At the time, nothing was thought of it, but on Sept. 13 the FBI interviews all the people in the classroom and confirms the event. The FBI later places the boy's family under surveillance but apparently are unable to find a connection to the 9/11 plot. A reporter for MSNBC later sets out to disprove this "urban myth," but to his surprise finds all the details of the story are confirmed. The fact that the family are recent immigrants from Pakistan might mean the information came from Pakistan. [MSNBC, 10/12/01] If the story is not just freak coincidence, it would suggest that al-Qaeda was surprisingly loose-lipped about the attacks."
How can our gov't be so stupid?! They had TONS of info PLUS this and a lot more!
I give this resercher a 99.9%, the reason why not 100% is because all dates are in "MM/DD/YYYY" format and these dates can be confused when international readers read the site. It's better to use ISO format, which is YYYY-MM-DD, on the 'Net because the 'Net is an international community. |
|
|
phyrest0rm |
Conspiracies... oh boy.. I don't even want to start naming the huge conspiracies there are. But for starters... here's a few larger ones to think about.
US knew Pearl Harbor would be attacked... and let it happen in order to propel the public toward a favorable view of entering WWII.
US didn't go into Vietnam to stop the spread of Communism... they went in order to secure a favorable market in rubber, rice, etc.
Gulf of Tonkin...... never happened.
Man... I could go on for a while... |
|
|
infinity HiGH |
quote: | Originally posted by phyrest0rm
Conspiracies... oh boy.. I don't even want to start naming the huge conspiracies there are. But for starters... here's a few larger ones to think about.
US knew Pearl Harbor would be attacked... and let it happen in order to propel the public toward a favorable view of entering WWII.
US didn't go into Vietnam to stop the spread of Communism... they went in order to secure a favorable market in rubber, rice, etc.
Gulf of Tonkin...... never happened.
Man... I could go on for a while... |
hehe, i can't wait till we see some of the advanced weaponry the superpowers have developed
But why would the US allow Pearl Harbor to get attacked? What did they gain from entering the war? Well, when you look at today, they did gain something...cuz after that day, they vowed to not not get involved...and right now, they're pretty much running the place, get involved whereever they want. If only the damn Japs didn't attack the States...heh, then they would've been "isolating" themselves from Europe like they were before WWII |
|
|
|
|