WMP 9 series vs. Winamp3
|
View this Thread in Original format
Dj DoomForce |
well i've through an odyssey to make wy wmp9 play mp3 files alright,and now its done! hooray
anyway,heres the question:
WINDOWS MPLAYER 9 OR WINAMP 3!!
and give me no "i have w3 equalised and crap!"
personally i think im sliding in the mp9 side;) |
|
|
CygnusX |
I can't choose, because I don't like them.
I'm sticking with Winamp 2.81. |
|
|
tranceaddict991 |
yea they both suck i had em but winamp2.81 is the best |
|
|
arj1o1 |
wmp 8 works fine here verison 9 not tested wmp 8 is enough for me don't need better
and winamp 2.81 for mp3's |
|
|
JohnSmith |
yeah, what they said. |
|
|
Blue. |
Winamp 3 eats up too much memory but the skin I have on it kicks ass which makes me use it :D something like 75 different colour choices :eyes: |
|
|
b|p|3m |
I use FreeAmp. I don't like winamp 3 ( too much memory usage for my poor computer :p ) and i never try Wmp 9.
:) |
|
|
BeatFreak |
I use both Winamp 3 and WMP9 and they both work fine for me. I got WinXP, 2.0 Ghz P4, 786 MB RAM. Get the MMD3 skin for winamp3. The only complaint I have about winamp3 is the load up time when you first start it. |
|
|
AussieTrance |
quote: | Originally posted by Dj DoomForce
well i've through an odyssey to make wy wmp9 play mp3 files alright,and now its done! hooray
anyway,heres the question:
WINDOWS MPLAYER 9 OR WINAMP 3!!
and give me no "i have w3 equalised and crap!"
personally i think im sliding in the mp9 side;) |
They both suck - one has bugs, the other eats up resources, but both look really nice :rolleyes: :D
Stick with the previous version of both :) |
|
|
AmbiguousBliss |
I use both, but Winamp's my preferred choice. (2.81, of course.;)) |
|
|
DrUg_Tit0 |
And another vote for Winamp 2.81 from me... |
|
|
jonsimmonds |
winamp3 was released to early and has a fair bit of sloppy coding in it, and i feal that windows media player does to much with to many features eating up memory, winamp 2.8x for me with the video pluggins installed! |
|
|
|
|