TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- WIP thread (DJRYAN now allowed to post tracks)
Pages (288): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 »


Posted by SystematicX1 on Dec-16-2017 17:19:

https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard/dark-sex

Really dig this, got kind of this tech vs house thing going on. Dig it. It is boomy, but feels intentional, which imo is good. It seems to fit and almost has that kind of "arguru" vibe to it.
I know one thing for sure, my girlfriend was dancing to it all the way through...lol which is rare..lol


--------------------------

Need some opinions on this. Pulled this out of the cobwebs.
It is a remix,it is Katy perry (heads up) /grins
I kinda don't want to post much on it because I am hoping some will pick up on the areas I am seeing need focusing on.


Posted by evo8 on Dec-16-2017 18:26:

quote:
Originally posted by SystematicX1
https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard/dark-sex

Really dig this, got kind of this tech vs house thing going on. Dig it. It is boomy, but feels intentional, which imo is good. It seems to fit and almost has that kind of "arguru" vibe to it.
I know one thing for sure, my girlfriend was dancing to it all the way through...lol which is rare..lol


--------------------------

Need some opinions on this. Pulled this out of the cobwebs.
It is a remix,it is Katy perry (heads up) /grins
I kinda don't want to post much on it because I am hoping some will pick up on the areas I am seeing need focusing on.



its too static imo, nothing really driving the track, not gone on the kick/bass combo


Posted by theterran on Dec-16-2017 18:32:

quote:
Originally posted by evo8
its too static imo, nothing really driving the track, not gone on the kick/bass combo


/agree

Also don't think the other stuff supports/blends with the vocals very well either. Sounds like Katy Perry dropped on a sparse mix. I mean, each individual instrument sounds good, but the total sound doesn't blend well.

Katy Perry anything always tends to have a big sound associated with it. She's pretty go big or go home most of the time.

Still only 1 Katy Perry remix I can stomach, and that's the ET Remix by Noisia...but that's because Noisia is just...that...awesome.


Posted by TranceLover007 on Dec-18-2017 21:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Butler
Here's the final WIP in the 3 tracks I'm going to be sending out (inc' the most recent 2 on here)

I think this is the strongest but it almost made itself, never found a track this easy

Need fresh ears on the mix

https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard/dark-sex


If I had to choose one of those track (and this is not my style lol) I would go for -> First Contact then Make Me Sad.

Cheers,

Darek


Posted by theterran on Dec-19-2017 17:29:

Welp, intro's done. Think the song's about 80-90% there...Ran outta creative gas, but I think the intro / breakdown / buildup ended up being "ok". Oh well. Tried for a story-like arrangement, with a lighter tone in the beginning, transitioning into the darker one after the first breakdown. Plenty of space to mix in with I guess. Friends who listened have said the second build-up / transition is a little too jarring @ 5:09'ish. Maybe a more pronounced build there is needed.

Still experimenting with sound FX and tweaking the mix here and there...My sfx library is pretty slim, so I ended up making some that I thought would compliment the vibe of the tune. I'd like to tie them into the song a little better though.

Spent a little more time on the low-end, should be a bit better now.

Still on the fence about the backing arps I made with Sylenth. They fit the overall mix, but sound a little anemic with less going on. Also not a fan of sylenth and its' squishy sounding resonance...but it's the one synth that produces that darker, techy trance-pluck I like.

Added a *little* variance to the hats. Any more is too distracting, I think.

Should be pretty easy to master this one too, plenty of headroom to work with.


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-20-2017 07:02:

quote:
Originally posted by theterran
Welp, intro's done. Think the song's about 80-90% there...Ran outta creative gas, but I think the intro / breakdown / buildup ended up being "ok". Oh well. Tried for a story-like arrangement, with a lighter tone in the beginning, transitioning into the darker one after the first breakdown. Plenty of space to mix in with I guess. Friends who listened have said the second build-up / transition is a little too jarring @ 5:09'ish. Maybe a more pronounced build there is needed.

Still experimenting with sound FX and tweaking the mix here and there...My sfx library is pretty slim, so I ended up making some that I thought would compliment the vibe of the tune. I'd like to tie them into the song a little better though.

Spent a little more time on the low-end, should be a bit better now.

Still on the fence about the backing arps I made with Sylenth. They fit the overall mix, but sound a little anemic with less going on. Also not a fan of sylenth and its' squishy sounding resonance...but it's the one synth that produces that darker, techy trance-pluck I like.

Added a *little* variance to the hats. Any more is too distracting, I think.

Should be pretty easy to master this one too, plenty of headroom to work with.



Really like this. Lovely atmosphere. The pad pattern gets a little repetitive towards the end of the intro in my opinion. Maybe you could break it up with some small variation to the chord progression? Just lift the last note instead of letting it fall in some occasion, maybe at 2:05.

I like the foundation of that build you talked about, and especially the drop, it suits the track with that kind of relaxed build up. But I agree that maybe something could be done to make the middle of the break a little more interesting.

Maybe you should take a break from it, and come back with fresh ears in a couple of weeks/months? That should do the trick if you don�t really feel it at the moment. It is better to let it take it�s time, than forcing it.

As you said, you are almost done, I would say you are 90-95% there, no need to overdo it either. The overall impression is great, looking forward to the final product!
Good luck.


Posted by theterran on Dec-20-2017 13:59:

Glad you liked it fuxzz, and I appreciate the time you took to listen and provide feedback!

Could definitely progress the pads a little more towards the first minor build at 2:35. I did end up skimping on the first section a bit in favor of getting the arranging done. The pads do drop down at around 2:35'ish, so I can easily work towards that shift a little sooner.

Definitely needs some more going on in the middle of that first break to make the transition into 5:09 a little less contrasting/jarring. Getting pretty unanimous feedback on this from my friends who have listened. The tricky part is going to be getting the intensity right without having it sound rushed or forced.

If my usual approach to adding the finishing touches doesn't work, I'll end up taking a break yeah. No need to force it, like you said.

thanks again!


Posted by evo8 on Dec-20-2017 16:23:

quote:
Originally posted by theterran
Welp, intro's done. Think the song's about 80-90% there...Ran outta creative gas, but I think the intro / breakdown / buildup ended up being "ok". Oh well. Tried for a story-like arrangement, with a lighter tone in the beginning, transitioning into the darker one after the first breakdown. Plenty of space to mix in with I guess. Friends who listened have said the second build-up / transition is a little too jarring @ 5:09'ish. Maybe a more pronounced build there is needed.

Still experimenting with sound FX and tweaking the mix here and there...My sfx library is pretty slim, so I ended up making some that I thought would compliment the vibe of the tune. I'd like to tie them into the song a little better though.

Spent a little more time on the low-end, should be a bit better now.

Still on the fence about the backing arps I made with Sylenth. They fit the overall mix, but sound a little anemic with less going on. Also not a fan of sylenth and its' squishy sounding resonance...but it's the one synth that produces that darker, techy trance-pluck I like.

Added a *little* variance to the hats. Any more is too distracting, I think.

Should be pretty easy to master this one too, plenty of headroom to work with.



this is really nice, the breakdown is a little empty for me, you could maybe have some background synth sweeps just to underpin the rest? nothing too dominating, just there
I think 9 minutes is too long also
nice!


Posted by theterran on Dec-20-2017 18:37:

quote:
Originally posted by evo8
this is really nice, the breakdown is a little empty for me, you could maybe have some background synth sweeps just to underpin the rest? nothing too dominating, just there
I think 9 minutes is too long also
nice!


Thanks. 9-10 minutes is about standard for a full trance arrangement from the 2000's, so I'm not too bothered about length. It's also great for passive listening...and there's plenty of room to mix in and out of too.


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-20-2017 20:28:

quote:
Originally posted by theterran
Glad you liked it fuxzz, and I appreciate the time you took to listen and provide feedback!

Could definitely progress the pads a little more towards the first minor build at 2:35. I did end up skimping on the first section a bit in favor of getting the arranging done. The pads do drop down at around 2:35'ish, so I can easily work towards that shift a little sooner.

Definitely needs some more going on in the middle of that first break to make the transition into 5:09 a little less contrasting/jarring. Getting pretty unanimous feedback on this from my friends who have listened. The tricky part is going to be getting the intensity right without having it sound rushed or forced.

If my usual approach to adding the finishing touches doesn't work, I'll end up taking a break yeah. No need to force it, like you said.

thanks again!


You�re welcome!

Yeah, I agree about the length: 9-10 mins is just about right for this kind of track. Nothing to change there.

Great advice about the background sweep though! That is probably what is needed, drown it in reverb, lower the volume, and put it far away in the background to let the main synth stand more or less alone. As Evo said, nothing to much, it�s enough only to have it there in the background without taking focus from the main sound, which, in the way I see it is building everything up just fine as it is. I think you already have the intensity needed, you just need something more to get the fullness.

What I meant about the pad in the beginning, and what I would do is this:

If I�m correct you start with C#, goes to D# and then down to a lower A#.
What I would do, is, that in one occasion, and only one, instead of going down to A#, go up to F#. It just feels right to me. Maybe you hear something different and better though. However, I don�t think you should change to much, because it creates a good hypnotic intro with this repetitiveness.

I hope I don�t come across as pretentious, what I say is said with all humility. I�m just putting my thoughts out there for you to consider. Obviously, what I say isn�t necessary right. Just wanted to make that clear so I don�t come across as someone �all knowing�


I hope you will keep the space in the track!


Posted by theterran on Dec-20-2017 20:58:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz

What I meant about the pad in the beginning, and what I would do is this:

If I�m correct you start with C#, goes to D# and then down to a lower A#.
What I would do, is, that in one occasion, and only one, instead of going down to A#, go up to F#. It just feels right to me. Maybe you hear something different and better though. However, I don�t think you should change to much, because it creates a good hypnotic intro with this repetitiveness.


3 Pad layers for the soft pad. (I also have a layered open saw pad that's a separate pad entirely and used later)

1st layer (Starts at 0:00) is F#5 + F#4 that's constant.

2nd layer (Starts at 0:44) is A#5, C#6 + D#6 back to A#

3rd Layer (Starts at 2:12) Is A#5 on the 2nd 1/2 note, then at 2:35 it's F#5, D#5, A#4

quote:


I hope I don�t come across as pretentious, what I say is said with all humility. I�m just putting my thoughts out there for you to consider. Obviously, what I say isn�t necessary right. Just wanted to make that clear so I don�t come across as someone �all knowing�


I hope you will keep the space in the track!


What you say is your opinion, and that opinion should be given freely. What I do with that opinion as the artist is also up to me. If I agree (and I may have been thinking the same thing anyway), I'll do it. Even if I don't, I might put it in anyway to see if I end up liking it. If I flat out disagree or tried it and don't like it, it won't happen.

Nothing pretentious about that at all. I appreciate it.


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-20-2017 21:43:

Okay, I guess you will make it work somehow!

Good, we think the same way then.


The Terrans piece inspired me to upload this, which been lying on my computer for quite a while. There are some seriously talented people in this thread, so I would appreciate if you let me know what you think.



Posted by theterran on Dec-20-2017 23:07:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz
Okay, I guess you will make it work somehow!

Good, we think the same way then.


The Terrans piece inspired me to upload this, which been lying on my computer for quite a while. There are some seriously talented people in this thread, so I would appreciate if you let me know what you think.




Like the vibe overall, pretty energetic / atomospheric, and it's a nice kind of different. Sound selection is good, and everything works well together. Vocal snippets are placed well, and are interesting.

Kick seems to be lacking some punch / drive though. It sounds alright at first, but gets lost in the mix I think. Since this seems like more of a beat driven track, that might be worth looking into.

Might consider doing some more panning / filtering work with that whooshy noise, or duck it a few db, to blend it in with the drumkit a little more.

Will note that I was listening passively to the mix, and then actively when I felt pulled out or distracted.

I thought the track actually ended at 4:00, and was pulled out of the vibe there. Even tabbed back to hit pause so SC didn't continue on down the random playlist it typically does and realized it was only 1/2 done. Gotta be somethin' there, 10 seconds of silence is a bit much.

Personal preference : I was hoping for some sorta distinct melodic hook / theme, something light and passive, but still memorable. Could theme it off of the vocal sections that fade in around 5:15, or something to accent the ambience. Could use any variety of instruments for it in this mix too. I just don't think the bassline is interesting enough to hold the beat, supporting vocal snippets and atmosphere together for the entire 9 minutes. If nothing springs to mind, or is inspired, then I wouldn't worry about it.

If you're interested, I have the 133 bpm snippet of what my brain was trying to fill in the void with...it's a simple, drone-y, backdrop harmony but, it might spark some ideas if that's something you'd like to toy around with.

Like you said, it's not worth it to force things in a song though. I feel it's usually pretty apparent to the listener...and it tends to be a detriment to the song more often than not.

Good job overall though, I liked it.


Posted by evo8 on Dec-21-2017 00:23:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz
Okay, I guess you will make it work somehow!

Good, we think the same way then.


The Terrans piece inspired me to upload this, which been lying on my computer for quite a while. There are some seriously talented people in this thread, so I would appreciate if you let me know what you think.




really like this one!! love the drums great groove, the kick just seems to fit in perfectly, wouldnt change it! bassline is simple but just works

i think you can do better than those male vocal snippets in the breakdown though, easily enough to remedy

ive been trying and failing recently to get this kind of sound, i keep drifting back towards modern techno but im determined to succeed, thanks for the inspiration!


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-21-2017 09:36:

quote:
Originally posted by theterran
Like the vibe overall, pretty energetic / atomospheric, and it's a nice kind of different. Sound selection is good, and everything works well together. Vocal snippets are placed well, and are interesting.

Kick seems to be lacking some punch / drive though. It sounds alright at first, but gets lost in the mix I think. Since this seems like more of a beat driven track, that might be worth looking into.

Might consider doing some more panning / filtering work with that whooshy noise, or duck it a few db, to blend it in with the drumkit a little more.

Will note that I was listening passively to the mix, and then actively when I felt pulled out or distracted.

I thought the track actually ended at 4:00, and was pulled out of the vibe there. Even tabbed back to hit pause so SC didn't continue on down the random playlist it typically does and realized it was only 1/2 done. Gotta be somethin' there, 10 seconds of silence is a bit much.

Personal preference : I was hoping for some sorta distinct melodic hook / theme, something light and passive, but still memorable. Could theme it off of the vocal sections that fade in around 5:15, or something to accent the ambience. Could use any variety of instruments for it in this mix too. I just don't think the bassline is interesting enough to hold the beat, supporting vocal snippets and atmosphere together for the entire 9 minutes. If nothing springs to mind, or is inspired, then I wouldn't worry about it.

If you're interested, I have the 133 bpm snippet of what my brain was trying to fill in the void with...it's a simple, drone-y, backdrop harmony but, it might spark some ideas if that's something you'd like to toy around with.

Like you said, it's not worth it to force things in a song though. I feel it's usually pretty apparent to the listener...and it tends to be a detriment to the song more often than not.

Good job overall though, I liked it.


Thanks for listening! Glad you liked parts of it at least. I am aware of that this kind of track isn�t for everyone.

Bass: I have had tremendous problems with making kick/bass work. And I am still not sure about it, but it will have to do, there are new compositions waiting to be made, so can�t work on this forever =)

And I�m glad evo liked it. That�s the danger with giving/receiving tips, you never know what kind of preferences the person giving it�s input have, so something that is ok for one, need to be changed for another. This is of course obvious, but easy to forget when you put stuff up for criticism, and very important to bear in mind. I actually think it can be very dangerous to search criticism too early in the process�

Mark Twain wrote something in the lines as: Don�t send me your stuff and ask me whether it�s good or not. The risk is that I don�t like it because of my personal preferences and turn it down, and something that would have been deeply appreciated by the public will never see the light of day. The artist must always, in one way, "stand alone".


About the silence in the break. I know that it is a little risky, but silence can actually be a really great effect under the right circumstances, and it serves a purpose for the continuation of the build up. I also look at it in a bigger context, like in a set, and in a �live� setting. I think that it could be really good�I hope so anyway. But thanks for helping out! Appreciated.

About melody. As you said this one is more about the beat and the atmosphere, so don�t want any apparent melody in it. Sometimes I just like it when it�s more driving, hypnotic, than obvious.


Btw, I was listening to your track again, and that piano melody at the end is beautiful. What kind of piano did you use?


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-21-2017 10:16:

quote:
Originally posted by evo8
really like this one!! love the drums great groove, the kick just seems to fit in perfectly, wouldnt change it! bassline is simple but just works

i think you can do better than those male vocal snippets in the breakdown though, easily enough to remedy

ive been trying and failing recently to get this kind of sound, i keep drifting back towards modern techno but im determined to succeed, thanks for the inspiration!



Glad to hear that, especially from you. I always liked the sound of your drums and kick/bass in the WIPs you've been posting here.

The male vocals will stay though. I�m aware of that it is ugly in one way, but that is kind of what I like about it.

I�m not up to date with modern techno. The inspiration to this one comes from schranz techno intertwined with progressive house�at least I think so. It is not impossible that your snippets here have been part of the inspiration to actually.

So maybe I have inspired you with the inspiration I got from you. That is a interesting phenomenon.

Looking forward to hear what you come up with. One of the dangers I think is when you start to think to much, and �want� to much. If you want to make a track in a certain style, you will not really listen and hear where the track itself wants to go. Often I feel like putting a track together is like a invisible puzzle. When the first peace is laid down, the rest is more about listening, and finding the hidden peaces that�s missing, than creating something. That is at least one way to look at it.

A tip would be, start with the background ambiance and go from there, that is at least what I did with this one.


Posted by theterran on Dec-21-2017 10:45:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz
Btw, I was listening to your track again, and that piano melody at the end is beautiful. What kind of piano did you use?


Nexus 2 : Piano, "Arena Ambience". FX Bus was : FabFilter Pro-Q2 -> Ozone 5 Multiband compressor + Harmonic Exciter -> Valhalla Vintage Verb (Nexus 2 Reveerb is decent, but not always the best choice)

Nexus has pretty good pianos. Both the standard Nexus 2 Piano and the PS Total Piano expansion pack are quite good.

I understand the preference thing. A few of the people who commented on my wip definitely seemed more into house...so I understood that they'd prefer a stronger kick / bass.

I try to review with more of an objective mindset, disregarding personal preference, trying best to consider what the artist was going for. Still might throw in a preference based opinion or two though, but never aimed at the mix. I've had a few songs get a really nice addition from an idea someone else had.

The other thing with mixes is that people are listening on varied systems. Something might be one way through headphone monitors, might be different on reference monitors, different listening environments come into play etc...


Posted by evo8 on Dec-21-2017 12:42:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz
Glad to hear that, especially from you. I always liked the sound of your drums and kick/bass in the WIPs you've been posting here.

The male vocals will stay though. I�m aware of that it is ugly in one way, but that is kind of what I like about it.

I�m not up to date with modern techno. The inspiration to this one comes from schranz techno intertwined with progressive house�at least I think so. It is not impossible that your snippets here have been part of the inspiration to actually.

So maybe I have inspired you with the inspiration I got from you. That is a interesting phenomenon.

Looking forward to hear what you come up with. One of the dangers I think is when you start to think to much, and �want� to much. If you want to make a track in a certain style, you will not really listen and hear where the track itself wants to go. Often I feel like putting a track together is like a invisible puzzle. When the first peace is laid down, the rest is more about listening, and finding the hidden peaces that�s missing, than creating something. That is at least one way to look at it.

A tip would be, start with the background ambiance and go from there, that is at least what I did with this one.


thanks - i think i need to get the drums and bass right first but starting with background could be a good idea, I also need to listen to more music from late 90s/early 00s


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-21-2017 17:09:

quote:
Originally posted by theterran
Nexus 2 : Piano, "Arena Ambience". FX Bus was : FabFilter Pro-Q2 -> Ozone 5 Multiband compressor + Harmonic Exciter -> Valhalla Vintage Verb (Nexus 2 Reveerb is decent, but not always the best choice)

Nexus has pretty good pianos. Both the standard Nexus 2 Piano and the PS Total Piano expansion pack are quite good.

I understand the preference thing. A few of the people who commented on my wip definitely seemed more into house...so I understood that they'd prefer a stronger kick / bass.

I try to review with more of an objective mindset, disregarding personal preference, trying best to consider what the artist was going for. Still might throw in a preference based opinion or two though, but never aimed at the mix. I've had a few songs get a really nice addition from an idea someone else had.

The other thing with mixes is that people are listening on varied systems. Something might be one way through headphone monitors, might be different on reference monitors, different listening environments come into play etc...



Yeah the piano sounds very nice. You have found the perfect amount of reverb and compression too!

Yes it is much to take into consideration in the world of music making, and even listening. Not only when listening for reviewing, but actually the same kind of mindset can be good to have when listening to music in general. Some of my favourite songs I didn�t even like the first time when I heard them, because I �thought� I didn�t like that kind of music. When I later heard them, and wasn�t aware in the same way, I actually liked them, and later came to love them. Strange how that works. I think many people doesn't even know how to listen to music anymore.

And y, others input can be very valuable, it�s only a matter of knowing when to listen and when to not listen, that can be a little tricky some times.


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-21-2017 17:26:

quote:
Originally posted by evo8
thanks - i think i need to get the drums and bass right first but starting with background could be a good idea, I also need to listen to more music from late 90s/early 00s


The right kind of background can actually make a groove in itself, that�s why I often find it easier to start with that.

Btw, did this ever get finished? Sounds interesting.


Posted by evo8 on Dec-21-2017 23:32:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz
The right kind of background can actually make a groove in itself, that�s why I often find it easier to start with that.

Btw, did this ever get finished? Sounds interesting.



yeah, fair chance i finished that one


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-22-2017 10:08:

quote:
Originally posted by evo8
yeah, fair chance i finished that one


Check your inbox


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-22-2017 15:59:

quote:
Originally posted by TranceLover007
Which of those two version of the same production is most appealing to you:

1. Vocal version but those are only a short verses and repeated few time for space reservation - you can have a sense of style of this vocal which to me is really interesting and adding a spark to this track.



2. Instrumental version



Instrumental is a bit easy for release as you own 100% royalties lol but vocal one add some attractiveness to this production.

Which one do you like the most?


Darek


I listened to those a couple of days ago, and I was coming back now to to tell you that I personally don�t like the vocals�but that I think that version was quite catchy, and might be appreciated by a certain kind of people, especially young girls.

But now I don�t know, I actually sort of like it, in a way. Maybe it was the autotune that put me off the first time I heard it (together with the intro drums), that is usually not my cup of tea. But the vocals go well together with your melodies. And the melodies are good.


The instrumental version�I wasn�t to keen on that either the first time I listened, but it is quite nice. Both versions seems to have grown on me.

So which version do I prefer? I don�t know. But I have to say that I am a little curious to hear the end result of the one with the vocals. If you go for that, you could probably finish the instrumental too at a later moment. It is probably harder to go the other way around.

So there you go. I apparently think you should go for the Vocal version. And later the other one too


Posted by Fuxzz on Dec-22-2017 16:52:

quote:
Originally posted by theterran
I try to review with more of an objective mindset, disregarding personal preference, trying best to consider what the artist was going for. Still might throw in a preference based opinion or two though, but never aimed at the mix. I've had a few songs get a really nice addition from an idea someone else had.

The other thing with mixes is that people are listening on varied systems. Something might be one way through headphone monitors, might be different on reference monitors, different listening environments come into play etc...


I came to think about one more important variable. It makes all the difference what kind of mood you are in when listening to a song. Sometimes, when I am in a certain kind of bad mood, I can�t even stand listening to music at all.


Posted by TranceLover007 on Dec-23-2017 01:24:

quote:
Originally posted by fuxzz
I listened to those a couple of days ago, and I was coming back now to to tell you that I personally don�t like the vocals�but that I think that version was quite catchy, and might be appreciated by a certain kind of people, especially young girls.

But now I don�t know, I actually sort of like it, in a way. Maybe it was the autotune that put me off the first time I heard it (together with the intro drums), that is usually not my cup of tea. But the vocals go well together with your melodies. And the melodies are good.


The instrumental version�I wasn�t to keen on that either the first time I listened, but it is quite nice. Both versions seems to have grown on me.

So which version do I prefer? I don�t know. But I have to say that I am a little curious to hear the end result of the one with the vocals. If you go for that, you could probably finish the instrumental too at a later moment. It is probably harder to go the other way around.

So there you go. I apparently think you should go for the Vocal version. And later the other one too


Sounds good man, thank you for your personal pick - overall I decided to go with vocal version and progression is going well and depend on vocal rerecording step (and how long it will take) I may be finish soon lol -> still working on drums sets as at this moment I'm not perfectly happy with it because doesn't drive this track the way I would like

Cheers man,

Darek


Pages (288): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.