TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- WIP thread (DJRYAN now allowed to post tracks)
Pages (288): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 »

quote:

Originally posted by TranceElevation Doesn't matter what you use. It is more important accustoming your ears to the equipment. Monitors are not a default insurance for success. If you are fundamentally stupid with low capacity of analysis and correct interpretation of circumstances even the most expensive arsenal won't save you. It might illude you, but it won't save you.

Your such a big time noob.

quote:

Originally posted by Vancouver New Track That is a bit harder than previous. hope someone likes it.

I'm not sure I can handle hearing that sample in another song haha. I wish the track wasn't so plinky-plonky in regards to the melody. And I feel like it should hit harder. It's too reverby and doesn't have that sort of powerful rhythmic impact. Of course I'm not really sure what your artistic direction was.

quote:

Originally posted by Seandroid I'm not sure I can handle hearing that sample in another song haha. I wish the track wasn't so plinky-plonky in regards to the melody. And I feel like it should hit harder. It's too reverby and doesn't have that sort of powerful rhythmic impact. Of course I'm not really sure what your artistic direction was.

I promise I won't use that sample again haha. thx for the feedback.

quote:

Originally posted by Vancouver New Track That is a bit harder than previous. hope someone likes it.

It's very polished, are most of the sounds your own?

My last 2 tracks people say they want a more aggressive bass, do you mean like this one which is a WIP I posted a while back, but with new beats and bass;

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Your such a big time noob.

It is a bit like a Ferrari. A fast car which would be devalued from a sense if you put a handicapped behind the wheel.

Or a bit like a Moog Voyager. A magical piece of hardware which won't serve shit in the hands of an idiot.

And this leads me to your topic about the barefoot monitors.
Most people were pissed at you not cause they are rude bitches, but simply cause they were convinced you are a hopeless idiot who no matter what gear possess will never make it.

Most people around here consider you an idiot Juan Paolino, deal with it.

Richard, what is your daw?

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

quote:

Originally posted by Richard Butler It's very polished, are most of the sounds your own? My last 2 tracks people say they want a more aggressive bass, do you mean like this one which is a WIP I posted a while back, but with new beats and bass;

besides the vengeance samples that pop up I made the other sounds.
not a huge fan of the vocal but I really dig the rest. I should start listening to more DnB

quote:

Originally posted by TranceElevation At this stage you got some serious problems with the bass in general, but with your ears moreover. What the heck are you listening on? The low end is there and for the type of track it is very appropriate. The bass shouldn't be boomy nor it should stick out, in many tracks it does almost work on a subconscious level I'd say. So really, you should rethink your interpretation of edm.

LOL im listening on Focal SM9s - what are you listening on??

Listen to that track posted by Evolve140 (good fortune) for a decently mixed bassline - maybe a bit too much sub but it sits well

Nigga, you just activated his trap card.

quote:

Originally posted by evo8 LOL im listening on Focal SM9s - what are you listening on?? Listen to that track posted by Evolve140 (good fortune) for a decently mixed bassline - maybe a bit too much sub but it sits well

Wow, you listen on Focal SM9s? So please tell me, where did they brought you?

The track from Evolve you're suggesting is completely different genre. Also, do you know the difference between bass and sub-bass?
The bass extends till 250hz. That Vancouver guy cut everything below 80hz, which is totally fine and common for bass. And the sub-bass, which you erroneously confound with the bass, is actually in the kick. (That 60hz you're whining about, but that you don't hear cause of the kick being collected/compressed with short decay.) You're mind probably needs a slower bpm to notice.

So my friend, what you're talking about is actually the sub-bass, which you should understand, isn't mandatory by the way. Some tracks are just good without it. (A different case is when we talk about deep-house, the track from Evolve you indicated).

Cause otherwise, by your strange perspective, we should wonder also where is the bass in this track?


I guess you need to explain to that noob Armin...

A completely different thing is when we talk about tracks like this one where the sub is essential.

quote:

Originally posted by MSZ Nigga, you just activated his trap card.

humouring myself

quote:

Originally posted by TranceElevation Wow, you listen on Focal SM9s? So please tell me, where did they brought you? The track from Evolve you're suggesting is completely different genre. Also, do you know the difference between bass and sub-bass? The bass extends till 250hz. That Vancouver guy cut everything below 80hz, which is totally fine and common for bass. And the sub-bass, which you erroneously confound with the bass, is actually in the kick. (That 60hz you're whining about, but that you don't hear cause of the kick being collected/compressed with short decay.) You're mind probably needs a slower bpm to notice. So my friend, what you're talking about is actually the sub-bass, which you should understand, isn't mandatory by the way. Some tracks are just good without it. (A different case is when we talk about deep-house, the track from Evolve you indicated). Cause otherwise, by your strange perspective, we should wonder also where is the bass in this track? I guess you need to explain to that noob Armin... A completely different thing is when we talk about tracks like this one where the sub is essential.

yes

quote:

Originally posted by TranceElevation Richard, what is your daw?

Cubase 5 is my DAW, but my mixing issues are I think to do with not having proper monitors and usually just relying on basic computer speakers and old Sony cans.

Drop the bass!



Ready for climax.

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Drop the bass! Ready for climax.

dont like the kick - too clicky or something, pity as everything else pretty good, sounds big

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Your such a big time noob.

What part of TranceElevation his post are you referring to, because I think he's spot on?

quote:

Originally posted by Deillon What part of TranceElevation his post are you referring to, because I think he's spot on?

Do you like gabber music>?

quote:

Originally posted by evo8 dont like the kick - too clicky or something, pity as everything else pretty good, sounds big

You never like my kicks hehee, thanks homes. Will be pretty much upgrading to the SM9's by christmas.

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Drop the bass! Ready for climax.

i like the atmosphere here, very nice

agree on the kick, not a fan

vocal fx are cool and overall mix is pretty tight imo

also it sounds in key so that's a big improvement

did you make/program the synths or are they loops??

i think it needs to go somewhere, you have the same loops looping in the background it needs a progression/movment

but in my humble opinion your really coming along so keep at it dude

quote:

Originally posted by chris marsh i like the atmosphere here, very nice agree on the kick, not a fan vocal fx are cool and overall mix is pretty tight imo also it sounds in key so that's a big improvement did you make/program the synths or are they loops?? i think it needs to go somewhere, you have the same loops looping in the background it needs a progression/movment but in my humble opinion your really coming along so keep at it dude

Thank you so much man...Synths are programmed by me, one Logic's own ES P synth, new logic 10's retro synth FM style and one virus TI lead (last one).

guys i got the demo recording of the vocals back (she lives in another city so its a remote collab)

My honest opinion is im really not keen - there's a lot of tuning issues too. I quite like the verse ideas but the chorus sounds really out of tune to me and just not the feel i wanted

Im only posting this here cos im sure she wont see it - i wouldn't want to offend her with my opinions

I piad her upfront as well (im a noob at working with vocalists). From now on im recording all my own singers too

Whats your honest opinions guys??

Cheers

Sounds groovy, I like.

quote:

Originally posted by chris marsh guys i got the demo recording of the vocals back (she lives in another city so its a remote collab) My honest opinion is im really not keen - there's a lot of tuning issues too. I quite like the verse ideas but the chorus sounds really out of tune to me and just not the feel i wanted Im only posting this here cos im sure she wont see it - i wouldn't want to offend her with my opinions I piad her upfront as well (im a noob at working with vocalists). From now on im recording all my own singers too Whats your honest opinions guys?? Cheers

Really liked that, imo the singer sounds very nice, the chorus part maybe is a little out on some words, but when i listened to it it sounds like it is purposely half spoken for effect & not that she's going out of tune .. the part at around 2.02 sounds cool aswell. Overall very nice & funky

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.