Oh yes, i'm doing it all the time.
The question is...why?
1)For the sake of conversation?
2)Seeing that one side has more "potential" (e.g. more people supporting it) and hence you go with the other side in order to "balance" the "unfairness"?
3)Pushing your ego? Demonstrating how "clever" you are?
4) Just for "fun"? (ofcourse, this is NOT a real reason, but people often say it).
Or...
Is it necessary that when you play "devil's advocate" you actually play "devi's advocate"? Maybe deep-down you kind of..."support" the argument, or maybe you are "fond" of it, or you think that this could be your actual attitude, but unfortunately you have a better one (which could be the opposite!),or maybe you are NOT supposed to have it because it is not acceptable by your socio-economic/cultural/social/educational environment, and hence by "playing the devil's advocate" you have the chance to finally "adopt" it...
(this would imply that JBJ IS actually a fundamentalist christian or that he would like to be one... )
or maybe...
when you play the "devil's advocate", you do it for the purposes of "exploring", from a first-person reference, the "other side" that you would never support/explore/analyse it otherwise. So there could be "exploratory" and "investigatory" reasons for playing the "devil's advocate" (notice that the "devil's advocate" may NOT be aware of any of these causes)
Just a few thoughts heh...
|