|
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
Most dance started with a digital medium. The issue would be knowing how to master for vinyl which most people are don't. |
Trudat, but with the cutter it will have an RIAA preamp in it so at least you don't have to worry about that part. but yeah, mastering for vinyl is more crucial.
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancelover03591
Looks cool! Personally I don't see there being a long term sizeable market for vinyl. I know it's comin' back but I think it's a fad. I am sure there will be a niche market but too small to sustain an industry. |
Lol, that's what they said in the early 90's and looked what happened. Sure it's not going to be on the same scale as it was but I think there will always be a need for vinyl and turntable sales are on the up again so it looks like there is a market of at least some size.
| quote: | Originally posted by Zak McKracken
i think that people who buy this wont print mp3 they buy but rather print their own production which could be 192kHz 24bit wav and properly mastered for all that we know, or it could be recorded from analog synths directly real time. this is enthusiast equipment for people with more interest in audio than the average edm dj. |
Yep, I'd love to cut my own productions, or if I was given a production from a friend in good quality, I'd much rather have it on vinyl. I can see how many dj's might easily have their assistant just getting all the promos received in flac or 24/96k and spend a day each week cutting them on to vinyl for them to play out.
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
It is cool don't get me wrong but as was stated the sound quality will only be as good as the digital file it comes from. |
Yeah, but that was the beauty of vinyl; shit quality or crap tunes didn't make it on the vinyl due to the cost. It acted as a filter. you'd have to be a champion muppet to cut 128k mp3's on the vinyl.
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
Why revert back to lugging boxes of vinyl everywhere? |
Do we really need the entire history of trance, prog and tech with us every time we play out for an hour? No. What happened to bringing 50/60 tracks that you really know well? at It's still 3 times what you need for a 2 hour set. 60 vinyls fit in one bag and is as much, if not less, hassle than lugging around a laptop, an interface and backup drives.
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
DVS solves the problem. I know it sucks to be behind a laptop screen but the convenience while still using vinyl is still worth it. |
It doesn't though, because it sucks to be behind a screen. Laptops kills the vibe, introduce a another potential problem and ultimately, has music or performance got better since the switch. The answer is no. More access to huge libraries of music has not improved music quality for either a DJ or a punter.
Dance music's most potent period was done on simple mixers with vinyl or even CD decks. The bells and whistles have just added noise, not quality content.
Last edited by DJ RANN on May-22-2015 at 01:27
|