Of course the current deficit spending is unsustainable. It was never meant to be sustainable.
May-19-2009 00:41
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
It was never meant to be sustainable.
so what exactly are you implying?
May-19-2009 04:54
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
so what exactly are you implying?
That the deficit spending is going to get cut. We'r in a recession and the government is following a Keynesian fiscal policy which dictates increased deficit spending during a recession. When the recession is over, then you should expect the government to cut deficit spending in response.
May-19-2009 05:33
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
When the recession is over, then you should expect the government to cut deficit spending in response.
hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
May-19-2009 06:32
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
I didn't say they would, I said it should be expected.
May-19-2009 07:04
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
That the deficit spending is going to get cut. We'r in a recession and the government is following a Keynesian fiscal policy which dictates increased deficit spending during a recession. When the recession is over, then you should expect the government to cut deficit spending in response.
whether this is the right or wrong approach, it looked as if you might have meant something else.
May-19-2009 08:26
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
unfortuantely, I think you are right. Obama is trying to do too much in this period that requires large upfront capital expenditures.
The only way out of this is through a tax increase. Cutting military expenditures is probably the best way to reduce spending, but our politicians and republicans are content with blowing away tax revenue on unnecessary military technology.
May-19-2009 14:40
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
unfortuantely, I think you are right. Obama is trying to do too much in this period that requires large upfront capital expenditures.
The only way out of this is through a tax increase. Cutting military expenditures is probably the best way to reduce spending, but our politicians and republicans are content with blowing away tax revenue on unnecessary military technology.
i heard some talking heads say "the Dems are striking while the iron is hot". i say they're striking while the iron is stupid.
May-19-2009 22:22
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
i heard some talking heads say "the Dems are striking while the iron is hot". i say they're striking while the iron is stupid.
lol - i remember obama talking about re-instituting the pay-go rules.
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Maximum Security twilight home for cats
Well... that second bounce was a doozy!
Aug-09-2011 07:25
zookeeper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Rochester, New York - on the shore of Lake Ontario
Well, well, well, here we are, 5 years later....
I am speechless...we saw this on the horizon and did nothing. I am enjoying reading where my thoughts were in 2006. Thank you for the bump, I think this thread will find new life!