 |
|
|
|
 |
Adam420
Trance Free Since 2003

Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Montreal, QC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by pozz
you did what i've been wanting to do for a long time. the combination of ambient and techno was goddamn seemless and excellent. in fact, the first 50minutes have been buzzing around my head for a while now. mixing is flipping flawless, as is track selection.
but, there is a criticism: after around 50min the mix went very steady, lost the atmospheric vibe & direction and continued that way until the end. it felt kind of like this: slow and steady come up, euphoria for a while, then comedown and flattening.
uhh... now that i read it over the review reads harsh. but count it as two reviews of two sections: the first, perfect; the second, good in an afterhours kinda way, but not really belonging with the first. |
Heh yea I can see why you thought that. The vibe does take a turn with the Markus Suckut track. It's what I was going for, but perhaps in the future I'll dedicate more time to developing the idea I had going with the first 50 minutes or so.
Thanks for taking the time to listen and leave your comments. I was hoping you'd show up here and I'm glad that you did. Your feedback is very much appreciated as always.
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
definitely did not get 'sultry' from this. but definitely monochromatic.
maybe steamy at the beginning with the hissy ambient techno tracks.
have to agree with a previous poster about the flatline though - it just plodded and didn't really seem to go anywhere. at some point in there around the 100 min mark it sounded like warmup music all over again. even these super druggy trancey german deejays like marcel dettmann go somewhere with their sets. and they usually play a range of styles too. cold, electronic ambient and ambient techno are really not very different stylistically, and i didn't hear any IDM in here.
i guess i expected it because of the title, but I think even when you have something that is 'monochromatic', it can have textural changes, especially in the mixing. some surprises would be nice. the way you mix you can hear everything coming from a mile away. this is like techno soup. cream of techno. lee porridge. |
Can't please em all I guess. I'll admit there isn't much IDM, I probably got that from the Andy Stott track, if that even counts. As for the use of the word sultry, well that was probably a misuse of the word. Remnants from when English was not my first language I guess.
Still, I'm surprised that you took a listen but I appreciate the fact that you did. Obviously I'm not as experienced as you when it comes to this and might not be able to live up to your personal standards. I never really made this kind of mix before, it was an idea I've been toying with with a long time now and it finally came together in the form of this. I'm pretty happy with the result but obviously I can always do better. Also, I probably covered more ground in 2 hours than a set of this sort really should.
The only part I really regret is with the Milton Bradley remix. It's actually very short and I was gonna bring in another track early on, but I was having trouble with it so had to put the Bradley remix on loop while figuring out the next track. In truth I probably should not have played it at all because it didn't really work.
But yea, thanks again. I'll probably do somewhat better next time if there is one.
___________________
My Soundcloud Page | The Free Soundcloud Stuff Thread
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Levels is...decent...damn better than a lot of the shite dominating the charts at the moment. It sounds absolutely nothing like...a billion and one similar tracks in this big-room style. I always had a soft spot.
|
Last edited by Adam420 on Jun-19-2011 at 06:28
|
|
Jun-19-2011 06:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lews
Platipus And Prog Addict

Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Hugging Whales And Saving Trees
|
|
|
Jun-19-2011 08:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location:
|
|
|
I loved the first section of this; really clinical stuff. The transition into beats was expertly done, too. The mixing in this part is some of the best I've yet heard from you too; very seamless.
From there, I think you held my attention up until just after an hour. What was the track at 42 minutes in? I liked it a lot. Perhaps it's just my general disdain for super-bleak Dettman/Klock/Tommy Four Seven-style productions, but I just found the middle portion very mundane. According to many, Marcelus is supposed to make amazing tunes, too, and yet I find his stuff just as uninspiring as the rest.
I think that to a certain degree, this set suffers from the same thing your recent prog one did. You obviously spend a lot of time digging for tunes, and you find a lot of middle of the road stuff. Stuff which, on it's own, definitely stands up as good music, but when chained together in a long set like this, fades into the woodwork and sounds the same as everything either side of it. This may just be my dislike for the aforementioned style of techno though. Essentially though, I feel like you're trying to pack too many tunes into your sets, going for quantity over quality.
It picked up a bit in the last 25 minutes, particularly with the cool dubby track around the 100 minute mark. Still, in comparison to the first 20 (or even 60) minutes, it was a bit of a disappointing end.
___________________
Mix archive | Melbourne club guide
|
|
Jun-25-2011 14:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:17.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|