TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- My Shrink Told Me...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by 'mju:zik on Nov-23-2003 14:46:

My Shrink Told Me...

"One marijuana cigarette is as bad for your lungs as 100 tabacco cigarettes."


Posted by Omegasox on Nov-23-2003 15:31:

I doubt he told you that. If he did, he should have his MD revoked.


Posted by KilldaDJ on Nov-23-2003 15:33:

King

its not called a cigarette when theres illegal substances innit. its called a joint, any arsehole knows that. some shrink he is

i would to told him to kiss my arse and smoked a blunt in front of him.


Posted by 3jaz on Nov-23-2003 15:46:

it's called "dope" for a reason


Posted by Ste on Nov-23-2003 16:04:

it doesnt give you cancer, but it fills up your lungs with lovely tar and paralysing chemicals


yum


Posted by DjSimonB on Nov-23-2003 16:38:

I thought the number was like 4 or 5... not 100


Posted by Chang monkey on Nov-23-2003 17:42:

Rasta

quote:
Originally posted by KilldaDJ
its not called a cigarette when theres illegal substances innit. its called a joint, any arsehole knows that. some shrink he is

i would to told him to kiss my arse and smoked a blunt in front of him.


LMAO
Damn rite


Posted by swisstoni on Nov-23-2003 17:51:

Thumbs down

bwahahahaha!! Somehow i don't think so. Mebe he meant that smoking 1 joint gives you the same satisfaction as 100 fags.


Posted by whiskers on Nov-23-2003 18:39:

the point is, marijuana is still bad for your health.

so many americans think smoking pot doesn't do anything to your lungs and i even heard a conversation where both sides were 100% convinced that pot is absolutely harmless. point of fact is - it's not. whether it's as bad as smoking 100 cigs, i don't know.


Posted by zarathustra on Nov-23-2003 18:55:

Joints are worse than cigarettes. Everyone should know that. Weed has more carcinogens than tobacco. It's a good thing a stoner doesn't need a joint as badly as a smoker needs a smoke. But it's so damn fun.


Posted by 'mju:zik on Nov-23-2003 19:18:

i couldnt agree with u ppl more.

my response was "are u sure its not more like 5?"

he's like, nooooooooo, its 100

i just laughed and never went to him again

nevertheless, it was funny listening to him explain how smoking a joint (as he explained because of the way you smoke it) is the same as smoking 5 packs of cigs lol

what a toooool.

anyways, have any of u experienced any rediculous comments by shrinks?? that was the point of the thread.


Posted by whiskers on Nov-23-2003 19:43:

quote:
Originally posted by 'mju:zik
anyways, have any of u experienced any rediculous comments by shrinks?? that was the point of the thread.



shrinks are ridiculous in general...


Posted by Unknown DJ on Nov-23-2003 20:37:

yea. i think they suck. i recently cancelled all my upcoming appointments with mine. cus they just suck at their job. i figure that i can either solve mey own problems, or talk to friends about them.


Posted by Orbax on Nov-23-2003 21:29:

Id say a tool is someone who has to go to a shrink.


Posted by diffusion on Nov-23-2003 22:48:

Hmm, isn't this ironic?
You are obviously convinced that hashish and mariuana is harmless.
However you do visit the shrink from time to time.



Pot/hash sucks. In fact, I hate everyone who's selling it.
I do also fucking hate the people who say it's harmless because IT'S NOT YOU FUCKING LAMERS.


Posted by moncster on Nov-23-2003 22:57:

quote:
Originally posted by zarathustra
Joints are worse than cigarettes. Everyone should know that. Weed has more carcinogens than tobacco. It's a good thing a stoner doesn't need a joint as badly as a smoker needs a smoke. But it's so damn fun.



Well first of all, joints do not equal 100 cigarettes. And also, think about this. How many packs of cigarettes does the average smoker smoke every day? How many grams of tobacco is that? How much tar/carcinogen is left in the lungs?
Now how many joints does the average cannabis smoker smoke per day?


Posted by jdjd on Nov-23-2003 23:14:

You can't make a general statement like that...

How much weed is in the 'cigarette'? How much thc is in the weed?
Even if you talking about an average spliff, smoking one cigarette has more potential to cause cancer. youre smoking all that other shit you put in it along with the tobacco


Posted by moncster on Nov-23-2003 23:17:

And those drug education programs are full of shit. They say marijuana is more dangerous now because its many times more potent. If that's the case, then marijuana is safer to use than ever, because it will require less puffs to get the same amount of THC.

And plus, there's always vaporizers but you'll never hear them mentioned in DARE or whatever.


Posted by drizzt81 on Nov-24-2003 14:12:

quote:
Originally posted by moncster
And those drug education programs are full of shit. They say marijuana is more dangerous now because its many times more potent. If that's the case, then marijuana is safer to use than ever, because it will require less puffs to get the same amount of THC.

And plus, there's always vaporizers but you'll never hear them mentioned in DARE or whatever.


Doesn't DARE stand for drug abuse resitance education? Then why do they tell people not to use drugs? They should only be concerned with ABUSE. There is a difference.

sorry for being OT again


Posted by SuperFarStucker on Nov-24-2003 15:36:

quote:
Originally posted by drizzt81
Doesn't DARE stand for drug abuse resitance education? Then why do they tell people not to use drugs? They should only be concerned with ABUSE. There is a difference.

sorry for being OT again


abuse is quantitized as use of any illegal/restricted drug... not that it's proper...


Posted by igottaknow on Nov-24-2003 20:07:


Posted by drizzt81 on Nov-24-2003 20:11:

quote:
Originally posted by SuperFarStucker
abuse is quantitized as use of any illegal/restricted drug... not that it's proper...
but if you are ABUSING something that means you are overusing it. Is a single use for an illegal drug automatically abusing it?

from dictionary.com:



I have never abused any drug.


Posted by Boomer187 on Nov-24-2003 20:18:

well obviously the shrink is getting at teh fact that not only is the content worse in weed, but you do smoke it differently. How many times do you do multiple inhales, hold, hold, hold, inhale, holds on a cigarette? The longer you hold it in the more time the bad shiat has to get into your body.

It was wrong of him to stick to the definite 100 number, it is practically impossible to measure, especially quantifying "worse for you".

Secondly, if you think shrinks are stupid and don't konw anything, why the hell would you waste your time going to one. If they are the ones that offer help, and your smarter than them, shouldn't you be able to help yourself?

But that is a personal issue, there are good shrinks and bad ones. You just have to find the one that tells you what you want to hear, then he will be a good shrink......right.


Posted by elena on Nov-25-2003 01:59:

are shrinks useless at all? i mean id rant to one if i had one but i dont see how that's supposed to make you a better person


Posted by DJ-Fuq on Nov-25-2003 02:14:

Theres a lot of bs in this thread.
Cannabis leaves are about 1.5 times as carcinogenic as tobacco.
But cannabis smokers dont smoke leaves, they smoke the buds which (apparently) contain around a third of the tar of tobacco. Hash probably contains much less than this.
Also, cannabis tar is not radioactive.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.