TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- man on the moon
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

man on the moon

I seen this discussed on another forum i peruse and someone made the point that, if neil armstrong was the first man to walk on the moon, who was it that filmed all this happening.

this may be a really dumb quetion, but it confuses me.

buzz aldrin?

there was a camera on one of the "feet" on the Eagle.

Apparently sum ppl are saying that USA didn't land on the moon on that faithfull day, it was all setup...

how did the flag stand upright if there is no air/winds in the moon?
why did the astronaughts told to sign confidentiality agreements so they don't expose anything without nasa's approval?

Shit like that that makes you wonder if they really did land

the flag was held up by a metal stick, you know inside the flag at the top.

quote:

Originally posted by bassaholix Apparently sum ppl are saying that USA didn't land on the moon on that faithfull day, it was all setup...

I think you meant "fateful," and even then, the use is improper.

Sigh ... this dumb theory has to come up at least once every other month. Ok who wants to argue this silly thing again? Present your argument so I can destroy it.

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Sigh ... this dumb theory has to come up at least once every other month. Ok who wants to argue this silly thing again? Present your argument so I can destroy it.

teh shadows!!1

quote:

Originally posted by DJ-Fuq teh shadows!!1

Weren't you around the last time this came up???

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Weren't you around the last time this came up??? http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html

Cant remember, i dont believe the hoax theories anyway. Thats an interesting site.

quote:

Originally posted by bassaholix Apparently sum ppl are saying that USA didn't land on the moon on that faithfull day, it was all setup... how did the flag stand upright if there is no air/winds in the moon?

coz they had a wire in it to keep it propped up

quote:

why did the astronaughts told to sign confidentiality agreements so they don't expose anything without nasa's approval? Shit like that that makes you wonder if they really did land

probably incase the found something alien etc on the moon...



btw i dont belive they landed on the moon but i know for a fact they propped the flag up with wire moon or no moon.

It was E.T. who filmed it with his handycam, hoping to get cool Universe's Funniest Home Videos footage

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Weren't you around the last time this came up??? http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html

yeah I remember this. was it you who was dispelling all the rumors.



hehe, I loved it when people said, why are there no stars there???//


hehe, I know we landed there.

Well here's the old thread:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...ng&pagenumber=1

Since nobody came up with an intelligent response to refute my arguments I thought the issue dead

it will never be dead. new people will always come around thinking it was a hoax....

ya need to form one post that explains it all and displells everything...then just copy and paste it whenever someone brings this up.

it's a hoax.

quote:

Originally posted by whiskers it's a hoax.

lol,


[mario]Here we go[/mario]

quote:

Originally posted by Boomer187 lol, [mario]Here we go[/mario]

my job here is done.

let the flames start


/on to more trolling

not long till go till the 50 year de-classification so it will be known eventually

not that it matters if we can get robots to mars

i'm not saying it's a hoax or anything all's i'm saying is if neil armstrong was supposed to be the first man on the moon how did they get that camera in position to take the pics of him coming out the door of space vehicle thing.

and nobody seems to have answered this yet with a logical explanaition.

quote:

Originally posted by chesco i'm not saying it's a hoax or anything all's i'm saying is if neil armstrong was supposed to be the first man on the moon how did they get that camera in position to take the pics of him coming out the door of space vehicle thing. and nobody seems to have answered this yet with a logical explanaition.

Well if there was a camera on the thing he was in, it mustve done it.

quote:

Originally posted by Luke Terry not long till go till the 50 year de-classification so it will be known eventually not that it matters if we can get robots to mars

how long more?


and who knows if they won't lie this time

quote:

Originally posted by whiskers it's a hoax.

I hope a moon rock hits you and you die.

quote:

i'm not saying it's a hoax or anything all's i'm saying is if neil armstrong was supposed to be the first man on the moon how did they get that camera in position to take the pics of him coming out the door of space vehicle thing.

The LEM had a camera housed in one of its foots.

quote:

Originally posted by occrider I hope a moon rock hits you and you die.

a man can hope.

won't help you turn this hoax into a real thing though.

quote:

Originally posted by whiskers a man can hope. won't help you turn this hoax into a real thing though.

I can live with the satisfaction of your death and the irony it entailed

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.