TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Amature DJ forum.... way more prog mixes than trance.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Amature DJ forum.... way more prog mixes than trance.
Just skipping through that forum, where i often put some of my own prog mixes up, but is it just me or are there hardly any trance mixes anymore? Considering this is TRANCE addict, i find that a bit strange.
but if you realize that most people love trance on this board but we also love tons of other styles.
well to me, progressive is true trance. its basically what all the lame synthlines and what not branch from...
id much rather hear progressive (now a days anyways) then trance...much more quality coming from that department
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rob_sardellitti id much rather hear progressive (now a days anyways) then trance...much more quality coming from that department |
its cos sasha has got a lot more melodic(/trancey?) last year, and so more people have gotten into prog+the rise and rise of zabiela has got more people into breaks too. think i actually preferred sasha in 2001/02 when he was playing more hypnotic and deeper, but its good to see people in general diversifying their tastes in music
I prefer prog mixes ![]()
Ooo, ooh! I'll record a sharp one over the weekend, then. 
Though looking through on my own, I don't see any particular glut of progressive.
choices are changing, trance fans like prog also and nowdays even more!!! I don't skip it... it owns!!!
Disco Stu would like to see a disco-mix!
i think that is because its a little easier to mix prog...there are a couple of people in there that are good, but the majority kinda suck tracklist wise...
also i've been thinking about doing some older mixes of like 93-95ish stuff...would you guys want to listen to them if i do em??
Prog is not easier to mix than normal trance. Trance is soooo much easier to mix.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by XeQtOr Prog is not easier to mix than normal trance. Trance is soooo much easier to mix. |
Trance is actually easier to mix.
30 second mixes are easier to maintain than my 4 min prog mixes.
Slower bpms require more preciseness.
Just remember the wise words of someone long forgotten:
"How can you tell when a jungle dj trainwrecks? Simple, you can't!"
*awaits the backlash*
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Floorfiller also i've been thinking about doing some older mixes of like 93-95ish stuff...would you guys want to listen to them if i do em?? |
Blame markus 
I think we have so many trance djs and producers that all the innovative ideas get used up quick but as with prog there aren't as many djs and producers (am i correct?) so that the innovation is more spread out in time instead of all at once like trance
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Floorfiller i think that is because its a little easier to mix prog...there are a couple of people in there that are good, but the majority kinda suck tracklist wise... |
)
i agree with Floorfiller on this one. i think that its much easier to mix prog then to mix trance well, because prog tunes are in general more layered than trance tunes and there are more sounds going on, so its relatively easy to blend tunes in and out of each other, whereas with trance, to mix it well requires a great deal more imagination, beacuse your dealing with a more basic sound, i think....this is just what i found when i mixed trance....saying that i think the real talent in prog is the set structure. its what spearates the really good from the rest.
the real fun is in mixing techno & being able to experiment much more, trance can be good if mixed well but theres a world of mini armin van buurens all playing the same songs that make it boring, harder trance (scot p) is coming back after 12 months lull now too, and im branching into psy more also which is the hardest of all of them to mix, simply cos of the random beat patterns
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian^ , harder trance (scot p) is coming back |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Diehard_clubber What? It's never been further away! |
trance is boring.
trance dj:
look at me! me me me! woohoo i can swap basslines. wait... wait... ok ::breakdown:: (GOD POSE) (PUMP FISTS IN 4 COUNT) (GOD POSE).
30 second mixes take so much skill.
any just to let you know-- you have to look for "key clashes" in every genre, not just trance.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by stupidisco trance is boring. trance dj: look at me! me me me! woohoo i can swap basslines. wait... wait... ok ::breakdown:: (GOD POSE) (PUMP FISTS IN 4 COUNT) (GOD POSE). 30 second mixes take so much skill. any just to let you know-- you have to look for "key clashes" in every genre, not just trance. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Cobalt a) I am a trance DJ, and I do not do that. In fact, I discourage any act that allows a trance DJ to glory in himself for playing other people's music. Credit goes most to the producer, not the DJ; the latter is simply a vehicle. b) Mixing trance involves more than swapping basslines, and anyone who does simply that does not count as a good trance DJ in my book (*cough*Armin*cough*). c) And your purpose for being on tranceaddict is...? |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.