TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Drugs
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Earthsnail on Dec-06-2004 22:13:

Drugs

You know, I don't understand why nations don't just legalize drugs. I'm not an addict, I've never tried drugs, and probably never will, but it doesn't make sense for them to make them illegal, especially since you can get them just about anywhere anyway. I think that if you legalize drugs, it probably won't be such a thrill to take them. I mean half of the thrill is knowing that you can't have them. I was talking to a dutch person about that and they said it's not really that much fun for them because they can get it anytime legally. I figure if they legalized drugs, most of the people will be mature enough to handle them (lie, but that's what I hope) without really F***ing themselves up that bad. What do you guys have to say


Posted by DJ-Kreing^^ on Dec-06-2004 22:15:

I say make Grass legal!
There is no real harm in using it and its also lots of fun.


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 22:21:

the reason drugs are illegal is because drugs promote child molestation. i was watching the news and there was this child molester. as a teenager, he had done drugs. case closed.


Posted by Floorfiller on Dec-06-2004 22:24:

quote:
Originally posted by nialsjd
the reason drugs are illegal is because drugs promote child molestation. i was watching the news and there was this child molester. as a teenager, he had done drugs. case closed.




he's right you know


Posted by ThomBizznitch on Dec-06-2004 22:29:

Drugs are bad, mmmmmmmmmmmmkay...



hahahahahahhaha......


Posted by Phil r on Dec-06-2004 22:38:

the reason they don't legalize drugs is because they would loose the next election.

relatively small proportion of the population do use anything more than weed, and the relateively small proportion of the population that do use anything more than weed CAN get what they want more or less.

cannabis is now class C here and every so often you get newspaper headlines "ecstasy not as bad as heroin".

they are clamping down on smoking, and everyone already knows booze can fuk you up.

next years daily mail: Your kids use drugs, but it's OK.


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 22:40:

we can't talk about stealing music and racism, but we can talk about illegal substances that cause impotence in 1 out of 2 males?

democracy!


Posted by rooibos on Dec-06-2004 22:43:

quote:
Originally posted by nialsjd
the reason drugs are illegal is because drugs promote child molestation. i was watching the news and there was this child molester. as a teenager, he had done drugs. case closed.


Do you have any fucking clue what you're talking about? Or do you just believe everything you read.


Posted by zarathustra on Dec-06-2004 22:44:

As far as I'm concerned, the laws can stay just the way they are. I have no trouble getting weed and it's pretty cheap. On top of that, the cops don't enforce the laws for possession of small amounts.


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 22:47:

quote:
Originally posted by rooibos
Do you have any fucking clue what you're talking about? Or do you just believe everything you read.


ya. are u trying to tell me that the WALL STREET JOURNAL made up an article about drugs causing child molestation because of the quarterly percentage drop of of Intel's stock?


Posted by rooibos on Dec-06-2004 22:51:

I refuse to even debate such a topic with you. You're obviously showing how much you know when you're using The Wall Street Journal as a refrence. And before you bother to flame me with some sort immature comment, I'll tell you in advance, to shut the fuck up and open a book or two.


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 22:56:

i didn't mean to hurt ur feelings. Look, i just find it kind of weird that ur alive. i mean, after ur mom doing all those needle drugs, i thought she'd be so bony that she'd break when she had u. toss her a turkey for gods sake


Posted by Stassi on Dec-06-2004 23:01:

quote:
Originally posted by nialsjd
ya. are u trying to tell me that the WALL STREET JOURNAL made up an article about drugs causing child molestation because of the quarterly percentage drop of of Intel's stock?

why would wall street journal even waste ink on drug talk???


Posted by t�bias on Dec-06-2004 23:01:

You will actually find that before prohibition, when heroin was legal and readily available, there were no deaths at all.

Now it is illegal, heroin kills about 1,000 people per year.


Prohibition in Australia has its origins in the 1920�s when the temperance movement was gathering pace. Regulations restricting the use of heroin, morphine and cocaine were introduced during the 1920�s and 1930�s in accordance with international treaties, predominantly led by the US.

In 1953, despite opposition by the Australian medical profession, the Menzies government, under pressure from the US and its captive UN agencies, passed a law banning the importation and manufacture of heroin.


Before the 1953 law, a heroin addict could get a prescription from his or her local doctor and collect a dose of pharmaceutical-grade heroin, in the form of heroin linctus, from the nearest pharmacy. In 1953, users suffered few indirect side effects from heroin. Property crime linked to narcotics was non-existent and although trafficking in heroin was a criminal offence, there were no prisoners in any Australian jail in relation to drug dealing.

Now under prohibition, heroin will kill about 20 people this week, mainly because of the uncontrolled dosage. Australia �s 150,000 addicts and regular users, will need, at an estimated $1,000 per head, a massive $150 million this week to feed their habit. This will result in a monstrous amount of muggings, burglaries, armed hold-ups, home invasions, stolen cars and traumatised victims.


Posted by t�bias on Dec-06-2004 23:02:

In a five-year trial in Switzerland, prescription-grade heroin was supplied to hard-core addicts from a series of clinics. Each addict was injected under supervision.

The results were:
� There were no overdose deaths for the five years of the trial.
� The crime rate amongst addicts was down 75 per cent.
� Homeless participants fell from 12 per cent to one per cent.
� Participants with jobs rose from 14 per cent to 32 per cent.

The solution is quite simple, but probably very unlikely:

� Take the distribution of drugs out of the hands of criminals and put it under government control (at least we get to vote for these crooks). Governments have no qualms about raking in billions of dollars as their take from the distribution of the killer drugs, alcohol and tobacco.

� Remove penalties for possessing small amount of �soft� drugs, such as cannabis and for drugs supplied under prescription.

� Make hard drugs such as heroin, cocaine and amphetamines available by prescription from pharmacies and doctors at a price that does not force addicts and users into crime.

� The government to tax all drugs and to put all revenue back into drug rehabilitation and anti-drug advertising.

� Legislate for harsh penalties in relation to:

Operating any machinery while under the influence of any drug.

Exporting drugs

Trafficking in drugs outside the government-controlled distribution network.

� Prohibit the advertising of all non-medicinal drugs, including alcohol.


Posted by Earthsnail on Dec-06-2004 23:10:

quote:
Originally posted by rooibos
Do you have any fucking clue what you're talking about? Or do you just believe everything you read.



thank you. right on. I'm not sure if that molestation thing is correct, because I've never heard that. But the American media is so screwed up. You can never believe anything you read or hear because it all is biased. The writer or speaker has opinion, and they always put their spin on things. If you are going to molest a child, it's not because you did ecstacy or snorted blow, it's because you wanted to molest a child. And if you really believe what you said, explain why their are hardly any problems like that in Amsterdam


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 23:16:

prove me wrong then earthsnail. molest a child WITHOUT being on drugs and then we'll get a debate. u won't do it until u actually get a hit of justin timberlake's Passion of the Weed.


Posted by Earthsnail on Dec-06-2004 23:20:

run for president tobias


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 23:20:

u know what i'd do if they legalized all guns? i'd shoot all your mothers and get a tax break


Posted by nialsjd on Dec-06-2004 23:22:

he can't run for president. he protects murderers. iraqi prisoners killed our troops. i say we make them naked and suck our dicks. legally


Posted by t�bias on Dec-06-2004 23:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Earthsnail
run for president tobias


Haha, but then I'd probably see the fun side of blowing stuff up.


Posted by Sunsnail on Dec-06-2004 23:44:

quote:
ya. are u trying to tell me that the WALL STREET JOURNAL made up an article about drugs causing child molestation because of the quarterly percentage drop of of Intel's stock?

wtf?

I think soft drugs should be decriminalized


Posted by beats and beeps on Dec-06-2004 23:45:

Niccotine is the most harmless drug in the world, but look at what it costs our health care system each year.

Marijuana could be legalized, yes, but dont you think it would be stupid for america to legalize marijuana, when its doing such an anti smoking push? I do not think that smoking marijuana is any better than smoking cigs, and i do, or have smoked both. But I can understand why you would think marijuana should be legalized, but i do think that users who smoke a substance should have to pay their own hospital bills if they come down with an illness that can be related to smoking.

Now if you think that mushrooms, crack, ecstasy, coke, or anything of that sort should be legal you are a fucking idiot.

If harder drugs were legal it would just be bad for society, and i think you would have to be an idiot, not to realise this. Alcohol is a very weak, and possibly beneficial drug if used right, but despite that, it still takes many lives each year. Once the use of other drugs grew, you would realise how dangerous they really are.

It always cracks me up when people say something like "more people died from choking on peanuts last year, than ecstasy use"
How many people in the world eat peanuts?
Compare that to the number of people who do ecstasy.
Besides a huge part of the peanut related deaths were probably infants..


Posted by rooibos on Dec-07-2004 00:05:

I personally think any natrual drug, wheather it be psyclobin or simple THC, could be legalized.

If you look at DMT, the strongest most intense drug in the world that's known to man (I don't mean strongest as in health wise, but effect), it's already in every one of our brains and gets released all the time, especially during REM. So technically, we're all carrying around a schedule I drug, yet its illegal. What I don't understand is why. It's equilivent to salvia divinorum. It's literally harmless unless you smoke it, which even then won't cause much harm becuase it's not a drug you can abuse. The trip only lasts 15 mins, 20 at the most, and has no side effects, it wont turn you insane, etc.

My guess is the goverments are scared of it (it being any type of drug). The taxing if it were legal (look at salvia though). Theres not much else. It would be safe to legalize any type of drug (I'm not talking synthetics), its just how its controlled what matters, and thats where the problem is, you can't control it, legalized or not.


Posted by smokeape on Dec-07-2004 00:08:

Alcohol was even illegal during Prohibition...and no, I'm not that damn old... Anyhow, legalizing pot would add some quality control to the product to protect consumers and, oh yea, add a hefty tax revenue as well. If you think the tax on cigarettes is outrageous, could you even imagine the tax on pot? But folks would pay it without much complaining and the narcs would have to spend their quality time on something more worth the while for society.


[[[smoke]]]

Bluefish - Been Too Long


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.