TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Firewalls....which one to choose?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by b4k-oz on Jan-27-2005 01:36:

Firewalls....which one to choose?

I may have to do some revamping and need some input and recommendations for some very good firewalls.

Also...can anyone explain the pros and cons of partitioning if the o/s is xp.

Any input would be greatly appreciated.


Posted by amb_ on Jan-27-2005 01:37:

She said "penetrated"...

hehehehehehehehehehehehe


Posted by LKD on Jan-27-2005 01:39:

quote:
Originally posted by amb_
She said "penetrated"...

hehehehehehehehehehehehe



*covers mouth and giggles like a little school girl too*

hehehehehehehhehe


Posted by b4k-oz on Jan-27-2005 01:42:

ok guys....let me change it then to....

Can anyone name some good and bad firewalls.


Posted by LKD on Jan-27-2005 01:49:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
ok guys....let me change it then to....

Can anyone name some good and bad fireballs.



teeeehehehehe


Posted by Surreal JRS on Jan-27-2005 01:50:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
Can anyone name some good and bad firewalls.


Sure, a great firewall would be a Cisco PIX 535


Posted by dallastar on Jan-27-2005 02:01:

I dunno all that much about how much penetration a Firewall could get - but I would love all that and MUCH MUCH more!












j/k


Posted by St_Andrew on Jan-27-2005 02:12:

i want to know a good software one for windows... zonealarm is driving me nuts... esp with ics


Posted by rabbitjoker on Jan-27-2005 03:27:

As posted here: http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...10&pagenumber=7

------------

If you�re all bonered-up about security here are your 3 best options (in order of quality):

a) build yourself a *nix box to act as your firewall / gateway, keep the box secure, manage frequent updates, etc, etc.
b) purchase a hardware firewall gateway/router/switch product
c) use some sort of software firewall (windows, Sygate, Zone Labs, Norton, etc)

Option A is best � but is a heck of a lot of work, as you have to maintain and update the machine quite a bit. If your machine is compromised � so is your security.

Option B is better than C (physically located separate from your machine), but not as good as A (since A provides more options, various software, etc). IMO it's better than A as well (if you buy a GOOD one) - due to the maintenance required for A.

Option C is the worst � simply because if your machine is compromised � so is your security.



====================

When I got broadband about 5 or 6 years ago I chose option B � to get a hardware security solution. I�ll share my experiences/knowledge about all this.

Many of these hubs or switches you buy nowadays usually have some basic security options built into them � however they aren�t that great (but better than nothing). They are basically a hubs/switches with a cheap firewall chip thrown on it. I�ll call them all-in-one units. The all-in-one units lack a number of the important tools to ensure that your computer is completely protected.

So the basic thing to be known is that all-in-one products with built-in firewall/network systems is that they can provide very simple basic security. However the all-in-one units do leave out quite a bit of customization and a number of security options what would truly make a system secure. To conclude this �all-in-one� unit bit � they do provide better protection that doing nothing at all and provide better protection than software (Sygate, Zone, BlackIC, Norton, etc) but NOT better than a focused hardware firewall (and the cost differences aren�t all that much either)

Most importantly there are a few hardware firewall products that do a VERY good job and are rated by ISCA Labs who is in the business of testing devices for security quality. (TrueSecure - who provides certification services which test resistance to security threats and risks; certification is awarded based on pass/fail scheme).

I have a ZyXel (http://www.zyxel.com) ZyWall 10W - Internet Security Gateway with Wireless Ready (see links below) with the wireless option installed.

The ZyWall 10W is certified by ISCA Labs as a firewall / IPSec product (meaning it met the high levels of standards for security set by ICSA)

The ZyWall 10W product gives me a full featured hardware firewall, stateful packet inspection, SUA/NAT, IPSec for VPN, DHCP Server/Gateway, content filtering, packet filter, static routing, UpnP, bandwidth utilization rules, and fair-over/ fail-back (so when the broadband goes down, it auto-connects to you dial-up, and back when the broadband is back up).

ZyWall 10W Link: http://www.zywall.com/products/mode...alue=1021873683

A marvel of engineering if you ask me!!

====================

The drawback with the ZyWall 10W is that it is not a hub, and it is not a switch � but it is a GATEWAY. Meaning it can handle the processes behind operating a switch/hub, but it doesn�t have the switch/hub ports. So to run more than one computer off the ZyWall 10W you�d have to buy a switch (stay the hell away from hubs � only buy switches).

Here�s a bit of a diagram to show the differences between setting up an actual hardware firewall (ZyWall) or �all-in-one� unit:

�All-in-one�: Computer -> [Hub/Firewall/Switch] -> modem -> world

Hardware Firewall: Computer -> [switch] -> [hardware firewall] -> modem -> world

So see � if you want to run more than one machine of the XyWall 10W � you need the switch. Get a 100 Mbps switch as the XyWall 10W supports 100 Mbps (the switch should cost less than $50 for a 5 port)

Wireless You Ask?

The ZyWall 10W supports G class wireless. You buy an upgrade card that slides into the back of the ZyWall 10W and you automatically have all the benefits of wireless built right into your product.

If you want to make the whole place wireless � just forget about the switch and make every machine in your place wireless (which is what I have done).

Anyway � this my setup � and I am uber-secure, windows or not.

Sorry for going too long with this � I�ll try to be shorter next time.


Posted by djdustx on Jan-27-2005 04:21:

i use mcafee is pretty good...but every week u run into something

but there virus prog is shit...mondo shit

for virus i use AVG Free Edition...i was previously using norton...and then tried mcafee. Once i installed this motha...it picked up 126 trojans that the others could not trace...so i recommend it

sebasano


Posted by MarkT on Jan-27-2005 05:34:

RJ's post gave me a headache...I plugged in a LinkSys router (not wireless) and called it a day


Posted by beanieboy on Jan-27-2005 05:41:

If you're just surfing, a Linksys is fine. If you are want to expose servers to the public Internet think it through...

http://www.juniper.net/products/glance/


Posted by monishb on Jan-27-2005 06:14:

I would recommend Zone Alarm Pro has been working great for me since 5 yrs.


Posted by tha_broad on Jan-27-2005 06:37:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee
quote:

Originally posted by b4k-oz
ok guys....let me change it then to....

Can anyone name some good and bad fireballs.





teeeehehehehe



Fireballs rocks!!! My favourite Sunday Nite Snack!


Posted by b4k-oz on Jan-27-2005 12:01:

Thanks RJ and everyone for your firewall input.

Now does ne1 feel that it's a bad move to partition a huge hard drive so that the o/s is in a separate drive and that private data is in another?


Posted by malek on Jan-27-2005 13:15:

Checkpoint Firewall-1 R56 on Solaris 8


Posted by baystreetboi on Jan-27-2005 13:59:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
Thanks RJ and everyone for your firewall input.

Now does ne1 feel that it's a bad move to partition a huge hard drive so that the o/s is in a separate drive and that private data is in another?


There's nothing inherently wrong about that. A benefit is that if your OS really messes up, you have the ability to simply reformat that partition while keeping all your data intact on the other.

Keep in mind though that it's still just a logical partition, so if the drive crashes, both partitions are gone... not just one or the other.


Posted by Spankmeister on Jan-27-2005 14:34:

quote:
Originally posted by b4k-oz
Thanks RJ and everyone for your firewall input.

Now does ne1 feel that it's a bad move to partition a huge hard drive so that the o/s is in a separate drive and that private data is in another?


Yes, I suggest doing this....Personally, on all my machines (I have 11 at home), I use a 40G drives for the OS, I partition it into a 15G and 25G partitions and put the OS on the 15G partition....if I want storage (I have around 2.4Tb of storage at home) I have network storage or add an additonal drive to the machine...

As far as firewalls, I suggest D-Link....Linksys is ok, but since Cisco bought them, it seems that they got more expensive and some models cut back on their features....

Do NOT, I repeat, do NOT use a software firewall as your only firewall....


Posted by AwakenedAddict on Jan-27-2005 14:57:

I run a D-Link router and Black Ice Defender (software firewall).

As for the partition question, I highly recommend partitioning your HD to keep your OS and your data separate. I run two 80GB harddrives in the following config:

1st drive: 25GB OS partition, 55GB data partition
2nd drive: 4x20GB partition


Posted by loca on Jan-27-2005 15:05:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
RJ's post gave me a headache...I plugged in a LinkSys router (not wireless) and called it a day


How about just going through a linux box?


Posted by Surreal JRS on Jan-27-2005 17:59:

quote:
Originally posted by beanieboy
If you're just surfing, a Linksys is fine. If you are want to expose servers to the public Internet think it through...

http://www.juniper.net/products/glance/


mmmm Juniper Gear! Sexy!


Posted by St_Andrew on Jan-27-2005 18:42:

quote:
Originally posted by loca
How about just going through a linux box?


Not that I understand why but IP tables etc seem to be a pain in the ass for all teh n00bs


Posted by loca on Jan-27-2005 18:48:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Not that I understand why but IP tables etc seem to be a pain in the ass for all teh n00bs


Bah, it's all about practice. You get it right eventually


Posted by St_Andrew on Jan-27-2005 18:51:

quote:
Originally posted by loca
Bah, it's all about practice. You get it right eventually


yeah i know... took me like 4 days before i got everything as i wanted it the first time i did it


Posted by b4k-oz on Jan-27-2005 19:23:

quote:
Originally posted by baystreetboi
There's nothing inherently wrong about that. A benefit is that if your OS really messes up, you have the ability to simply reformat that partition while keeping all your data intact on the other.

Keep in mind though that it's still just a logical partition, so if the drive crashes, both partitions are gone... not just one or the other.


This is exactly the reason why I want to partition...but I was speaking to a ryerson computer professor who consults and he says that xp should not be partitioned. Apparently to him, we shudn't take chances with XP. He made it sound as if xp couldn't handle the partitioning and then said that since drives where so cheap...it's best to get another drive for data rather than to partition.

To me his consult seems illogical. why would ne1 want to waist a whole hd on xp


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.