TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Rane MP & XP 2016 vs Xone 92
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Raptor on Feb-25-2005 10:29:

Rane MP & XP 2016 vs Xone 92

I'm about to buy a new mixer but i don't know which one to get. I mix all kinds of music disco house, prog, tribal, hip hop funk, and breaks. i'm getting really into house and breaks again. so i'm not sure which mixer to get. i can always cut it up with the cross fader on the rane mp 2016 instead of the rotary faders. the linear faders may come in handy when i mix funky breaks like krafty kuts. so can someone help me i need someone who has tried out both mixers.


Posted by Sunnyside on Feb-25-2005 11:11:

If I was spending that amount of money on a mixer, I'd want to try it first. Pointless going on other people's opinions if it doesn't do what YOU want it to do.


Posted by Rememberence_ on Feb-25-2005 17:25:

The Rane is a beautifully sounding mixer with some of the smoothest EQs I have laid my hands on. If you do go with it, make sure to get the updated version which is the 2016a instead of the 2016. It has the ability to blend two channels in the headphones when cuing.

Personally, I would spend the money on the Xone:92. The features on it are outstanding, as are the build and sound qualities. Rotary faders are nice and smooth but I prefer sliders. I also don't need the Rane's 6 channels, and would prefer the famous 4 band EQs and filters on the Xone.

Being an owner of a Xone:32 I have fallen in love with Allen & Heath. I also really enjoy mixing on the Rane 2016 at the club I play at, but if I had the money, I would go for the 92.


Posted by Zack Roth on Feb-25-2005 18:25:

honestly, I'm not really one to post something liek this, but this shit is getting annoying. If you searched the words "Rane + Xone" you would have pulled up about 20 useful threads, some with the same exact thread title as yours.


Posted by Psiweaver on Feb-27-2005 03:22:

There is a new analog filter attachment coming out for the xone series.


Posted by DJ Tranz on Feb-27-2005 05:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Psiweaver
There is a new analog filter attachment coming out for the xone series.



And It Has Arrived:

Allen & Heath VF-1 Analogue Filter Unit.



click on the picture for info.



Cheers...


Posted by dRale on Feb-27-2005 06:00:

allen and heath used to makeamazing stuff..but the company was recently bought by profit driven bastards...so garbage is starting to be put into the products...be careful


Posted by failsafe on Feb-28-2005 01:23:

Can you hook that fliter unit up the same way you do with an efx-500 through the send returns or through the master out beteween the mixer and the amp?


Posted by Psiweaver on Feb-28-2005 03:53:

Definately be able to hook it up to an effects unit.


Posted by muli on Feb-28-2005 04:03:

Ecler Nuo 5!


Posted by Inertia on Feb-28-2005 04:42:

quote:
Originally posted by muli
Ecler Nuo 5!


the man makes a point. otherwise, check out A&Hs.

Rane Rotaries don't really seem logical for a bedroom setup.


Posted by Keith Chambers on Mar-01-2005 20:56:

Keep in mind that the Rane is a rack mount mixer. You can't lay it on its back like most mixers. So on top of the cost of the mixer you need to shell out some cash to mount it in some way.

Other than that the mixer is great. I'm assuming the A&H is too but I have never used it. If you want to download an example of how nice the Rane 2016 can sound, check out this WAV:

21MBs
http://www.nitroevents.com/mp3/dido.wav

I copied this last night. The signal path is Clearaudio Emotion Turntable > Shure V15VxMR > 1 foot Mogami RCA > Rane 2016 MP > 3 foot Mogami XLR > M-Audio Firewire 410 > Bias Peak 4. The final audio I recorded was not retouched in any way.

Thanks,
Keith


Posted by ESMdjm600 on Mar-06-2005 21:01:

see my thing with the rane, is that ne one who has used a different rotary mixer has said the rane is a complete piece of garbage.... especially if they gave they're old urei to rane for research when rane was researching ureis for making their rotary mixer... rane would then send them their 2016 if u gave them a urei and had nothing but complaints... i dunno, me personally i wouldnt waste my time, and i know people will have different opinions on this, but i know in this industry u get wat u pay for, and we all know theres slide mixers the same price range as their rotary, which makes me question their rotary as well. id probably get the new urei over that


Posted by A83 on Mar-07-2005 02:22:

That sample sounds EXACTLY the same as my friggin djx700

FM compression makes it sound HOT though

Xone V6


Posted by DannyO on Mar-07-2005 02:42:

quote:
Originally posted by A83
That sample sounds EXACTLY the same as my friggin djx700


Yea it probably will to most people, if that is an amazing sample of the Rane, then your gonna need top notch speakers with top notch cable and top notch amp to hear it, you can have the worlds best sounding mixer with worlds best Audiophile turntable and needle, but if your running your "Best Buy" mini system stereo to listen to it, its only gonna be as good as those speakers can do, so really for you to hear that sample for what it is, you need to spend about 2 grand on speakers and about 200 on cables.

I ain't gonna download this sample as it will only sound as good as my weakest link, which is my speakers.


Posted by A83 on Mar-07-2005 02:59:

quote:
Originally posted by DannyO
Yea it probably will to most people, if that is an amazing sample of the Rane, then your gonna need top notch speakers with top notch cable and top notch amp to hear it, you can have the worlds best sounding mixer with worlds best Audiophile turntable and needle, but if your running your "Best Buy" mini system stereo to listen to it, its only gonna be as good as those speakers can do, so really for you to hear that sample for what it is, you need to spend about 2 grand on speakers and about 200 on cables.

I ain't gonna download this sample as it will only sound as good as my weakest link, which is my speakers.


Yeah...waste of money to buy a big bulky pricey mixer like that for a home system. The EQ's may be nice and such...but there are other mixers out there that are just as good.


Posted by DannyO on Mar-07-2005 03:07:

quote:
Originally posted by A83
Yeah...waste of money to buy a big bulky pricey mixer like that for a home system. The EQ's may be nice and such...but there are other mixers out there that are just as good.


Well no, there are many DJs on here that want good sound, so when they buy a mixer of this quality, they will buy or already own a set of top quality speakers, I don't have the best speakers, they mainly just make alot of loud noise, but my mixer can churn out a good quality signal, and for this the next set of speakers I get will be able to make use of that extra quality, believe me after you have heard a good sounding setup, you won't want to go back, when I started upgrading my whole setup, I did the whole lot except the speakers, and it sounded great, then I upgraded the speaker wire to so nice high end cable and it made a huge difference, and now I want to upgrade the speakers to get the true sound that I should be hearing, trust me once you start going higher in the sound quality department, you won't ever go back down.


Posted by dj chex on Mar-07-2005 04:33:

quote:
Originally posted by DannyO
Well no, there are many DJs on here that want good sound, so when they buy a mixer of this quality, they will buy or already own a set of top quality speakers, I don't have the best speakers, they mainly just make alot of loud noise, but my mixer can churn out a good quality signal, and for this the next set of speakers I get will be able to make use of that extra quality, believe me after you have heard a good sounding setup, you won't want to go back, when I started upgrading my whole setup, I did the whole lot except the speakers, and it sounded great, then I upgraded the speaker wire to so nice high end cable and it made a huge difference, and now I want to upgrade the speakers to get the true sound that I should be hearing, trust me once you start going higher in the sound quality department, you won't ever go back down.


That's so true.... "Big bulky pricy mixers" do sound great in great home systems... It's been a uphill battle for me trying to get my setup perfect for me. So far i'm in love with everyting except my speakers. Thus, after checking out the hr824s again, i'll hopefully grab a pair in the next few months. high quality sound just makes everything feel so good.


Posted by DJ STEEVROCK on Mar-07-2005 23:17:



This is what I have a home. Great trance and EDM mixer. This best part is that if you want rotary knobs you can buy the rotary kit. I have yet to see any other mixer to offer that option. Its great for bedroom djs.

Vestax Rotary Kit

Ive had this mixer for three years. Ive put this mixer through hell and I havent had not one problems. My only concern is that it doesnt have curve control but thats because I like to scratch.


Oh not to mention its very inexpensive for this quality mixer. $250.00 at the most if you look rite.


Posted by A83 on Mar-07-2005 23:36:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ STEEVROCK


This is what I have a home. Great trance and EDM mixer. This best part is that if you want rotary knobs you can buy the rotary kit. I have yet to see any other mixer to offer that option. Its great for bedroom djs.

Vestax Rotary Kit

Ive had this mixer for three years. Ive put this mixer through hell and I havent had not one problems. My only concern is that it doesnt have curve control but thats because I like to scratch.


Oh not to mention its very inexpensive for this quality mixer. $250.00 at the most if you look rite.





That owns ur pvc 275


Posted by DJ STEEVROCK on Mar-08-2005 00:28:

quote:
Originally posted by A83



That owns ur pvc 275




No it doesnt. Your only paying for the name. It has no touch screen like the 909, only has two channel, no option for rotory, no kill switches, its made for hip hop not edm, no effects.... So explain how does that mediocre mixer own the PVC 175. If anything you should have posted the DJM 500/600 but it still doesnt compare to the price of the Vestax 175 ($250 at the most)

Enlighten me


Posted by Zild on Mar-08-2005 00:38:

The 707 doesn't own the Vestax so stop being ignornt. They're both great mixers for the price. I feel they should be used for different applications.


Posted by DannyO on Mar-08-2005 00:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
The 707 doesn't own the Vestax so stop being ignornt. They're both great mixers for the price. I feel they should be used for different applications.


Yup, plus the guy loves it, it IS a good mixer, and it hasn't gone wrong, and so who cares if there is MAYBE something better out there for the price, plus he has had it for 3 years, the 707 wasn't even around then.


Posted by Keith Chambers on May-08-2005 10:19:

I just bought a xone:92 for my home setup. So if anybody actually wants it I can probably do a couple tests with vinyl recording to see which one sounds better.

If nobody wants to hear 2016 vs 92 then I won't waste my time. I'm sure they both sound nice. :-)


Posted by nrjizer on May-08-2005 15:53:

I'm sure they both sound very nice.

I'm more interested in a head to head comparison of features, ease of use, etc. Which one you think you'd prefer if you could only have one.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.