TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- EQing
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
EQing
iv always wondered about this so now im just ganna ask
when mxing one track to another do u adjust the new tracks EQ so it sounds similar to the outgoing track? because up untill now iv just been straight mixixng with the EQ's at default, sometimes mixing with the EQ's using low etc but in the end they all just end up at default
It all depends on which songs you are mixing and what kind of mix you want. There are no rules really. Usually, the live song will be at full eq and the cued song will have its lows turned down a bit, so that when you bring in the cued song, you slowly swap the lows and bring the eqs of the cued song to full. Or sometimes you might want to do a very exagerated bass swap as opposed to doing it slowly.
you can also play around with the mids and highs. Say if the cued song has really pronounced hi-hats, you might want to keep the hi's down at first when fading the song in.
You really need to experiment for yourself and see what works.
Yep. Its all about what works for you best. Just keep at it and you will find the way thats best for you. As you will hear around here alot, there is no wrong way. I learned my own way with everything. No one taught me a damn thing, and I'm glad cause the way I mix is my own way. Just have fun with it.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike123 I learned my own way with everything. No one taught me a damn thing, and I'm glad cause the way I mix is my own way. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Joshua H It all depends on which songs you are mixing and what kind of mix you want. There are no rules really. Usually, the live song will be at full eq and the cued song will have its lows turned down a bit, so that when you bring in the cued song, you slowly swap the lows and bring the eqs of the cued song to full. Or sometimes you might want to do a very exagerated bass swap as opposed to doing it slowly. you can also play around with the mids and highs. Say if the cued song has really pronounced hi-hats, you might want to keep the hi's down at first when fading the song in. You really need to experiment for yourself and see what works. |
i love eq'ing during breakdowns...sends chills down my spine and gives me goosebumps sometimes...its great
| quote: |
| Originally posted by i got big pants i love eq'ing during breakdowns...sends chills down my spine and gives me goosebumps sometimes...its great |
I guess that without EQing, you as a DJ won't suck. If you mix at
0 Db that should work fine. all i am trying to say is that it isn't the end of the world if you don't EQ.
no one tought me how to DJ, i just learned it my way, with a two band EQ (behringer vmx 100,
the crappiest mixer on the market
IMO) hopefully oneday a DXM06!!
What DJ Joshua H said is also pretty much what i do, so that is def. something to work at.
just mess around with it, good things happen thru messing around!!
DJ ICE777
Iv nearly always mixed by bringing in one range at a time but now im also tryin to play around with the eqs to get the songs to match a little more.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ ICE777 I guess that without EQing, you as a DJ won't suck. If you mix at 0 Db that should work fine. all i am trying to say is that it isn't the end of the world if you don't EQ. no one tought me how to DJ, i just learned it my way, with a two band EQ (behringer vmx 100, the crappiest mixer on the market IMO) hopefully oneday a DXM06!!What DJ Joshua H said is also pretty much what i do, so that is def. something to work at. just mess around with it, good things happen thru messing around!! DJ ICE777 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jeremy H -1 Clashing frequencies sounds crap |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jeremy H -1 Clashing frequencies sounds crap |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild They do, thats why a huge part of being a DJ is track selection. What did DJs do when they had to mix on mixers without EQs? They payed more attention to which tracks sound great together instead of saying, hey I can just kill the highs on this one and the mix will be ok. I used to use the EQs heavily to mix but recently I've just been using the EQs to keep the bass from phasing or to boost a frequency here or there if I'm mixing in a track thats pressed wrong or has less energy or whatever but its not a normal thing. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jeremy H No matter how well u choose your tracks, adjusting the EQs can always make the mix sound smoother. |
i agree zild, i have never used the mid or hi eq while mixing and i tell ya the mixin is still seamless and fukin sexual.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild I beg to differ. Some of my smoothest mixes have been done by forcing myself to mix in key and to leave the EQs alone except to correct for the bass phasing. Thats the plain truth and if you don't believe me get two of your tracks that are very close in BPM and are the same key and mix them together using only the Bass EQ to correct for phasing and only the channel faders to maintain proper gain levels. |
I agree with you Zild. I have tried playing certain tracks with another track, and no matter how hard I try, I can't get the mix to sound good. I try my best to learn everything about the music I have in my case, and what tracks will go good with others. It is a very important part of DJing.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jeremy H I doubt that the "perfect" mix often is with the EQs at default.. but I know that you sometimes dont need to fiddle around with them too much. Depends on the genre you're playing too.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild I still have to disagree. I find that when my track selection is really on and I'm in the groove I hardly have to use the mids or highs at all. I can get in and out of tracks quicker if I don't have to spend a few phrases diddling with the mids and highs. Keep in mind this is something I've just recently started doing and that I don't spin trance but I think the trend also applies to trance. |
I play progressive and nu skool breaks and I don't find them all that different in trance. I do find DJs that only do intro/outro mixing to be very boring. I like DJs that will play a track but mix out of it before the second breakdown hits or will mix the track in after the first breakdown, skipping it entirely. I guess we're just into two different types of mixing. Again this is something I've just recently gotten into and a lot of mixes I used to do don't sound right when done this way.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild I play progressive and nu skool breaks and I don't find them all that different in trance. I do find DJs that only do intro/outro mixing to be very boring. I like DJs that will play a track but mix out of it before the second breakdown hits or will mix the track in after the first breakdown, skipping it entirely. I guess we're just into two different types of mixing. Again this is something I've just recently gotten into and a lot of mixes I used to do don't sound right when done this way. |
Thats all I meant by saying get in and of tracks quicker though. I never said you said anything about intro/outro mixing.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Thats all I meant by saying get in and of tracks quicker though. I never said you said anything about intro/outro mixing. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Fresh If your not sure what I mean check this little mix between two tunes: BLENDING.ZIP |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DarkFall01 I think it's down |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.