TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Montreal
-- Pictures: Montreal at night without a tripod
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 05:22:

Pictures: Montreal at night without a tripod

I was about to join some friends at a club and the rain had stopped, seeing how the Place Ville Marie looked awesome, I decided to take some quick shots without a tripod at ISO1600 and ISO3200.

As it turns out, it wasn't a bad idea after all. After I had finished with Aria, I decided to go around near la tour de la bourse for some more shots at around 430am.

Enjoy!

ISO3200:



ISO1600:








Past 4:30 am:









Posted by KrinKer on Apr-25-2005 05:38:

Malek

Still wondering why you're sick ??

BECAUSE YOU TAKE SO MANY OF THOSE DAMN NIGHT PICTURES :P

lol

KrinKer


Posted by Wisnia on Apr-25-2005 05:38:

As always beautiful.


Posted by RazerYokes on Apr-25-2005 05:56:


Posted by fastmp3 on Apr-25-2005 06:01:

seul un jeune p�d� comme malek laisserait tomber un set de malade de danny howells pour prendre des photos


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 06:03:

quote:
Originally posted by fastmp3
seul un jeune p�d� comme malek laisserait tomber un set de malade de danny howells pour prendre des photos


j'ai pas laisser pour prendre des photos, j'ai laisser parceque je dormais debout ou presque... en realite une gorge seche c'est pas l'ideal avec la fumee au Aria...


Posted by fastmp3 on Apr-25-2005 06:38:

dommage t'as pas pu rester parce qu'apr�s ca a repris


Posted by DJ Charlie on Apr-25-2005 06:50:

Re: Pictures: Montreal at night without a tripod

quote:
Originally posted by malek




Nice !!!! avec la br�me... wow


Posted by FunKenLouis on Apr-25-2005 09:44:

Re: Re: Pictures: Montreal at night without a tripod

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Charlie
Nice !!!! avec la br�me... wow


+1


Posted by FunKenLouis on Apr-25-2005 09:45:

actually... the first building is the sunlife building...

where my dad used to work...

offices of Fianciere Banque Nationale

in front of dominion square


Posted by mcb001982 on Apr-25-2005 11:46:

simply spectacular


Posted by Kate Manus on Apr-25-2005 12:12:

awesome pics Malek
that's pretty much right where I work too!


Posted by starsearcher on Apr-25-2005 13:22:

Malek, how'd you manage that without a tripod? Were you using the Canon IS lens? Cause those look super sharp!


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 14:15:

quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Malek, how'd you manage that without a tripod? Were you using the Canon IS lens? Cause those look super sharp!



my lense isn't IS, i was using ISO1600 at around 25 to 40 shutter speed handheld.

just hold it steady


Posted by starsearcher on Apr-25-2005 14:23:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
my lense isn't IS, i was using ISO1600 at around 25 to 40 shutter speed handheld.

just hold it steady


You've got some SERIOUSLY steady hadns ...don't think I could do it

By the way while we're on the topic, what do you think of the of the Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Autofocus lens? I'm going to NYC in a month and I know a place where they sell it cheap...I've read som great reviews but you're the photo man


Posted by Pixiechick on Apr-25-2005 14:52:

Re: Re: Pictures: Montreal at night without a tripod

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Charlie
Nice !!!! avec la br�me... wow


That's my favorite one too Malek! Awesome pics overall...

And good to see you on Saturday night - it's been awhile


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 15:21:

quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
You've got some SERIOUSLY steady hadns ...don't think I could do it

By the way while we're on the topic, what do you think of the of the Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Autofocus lens? I'm going to NYC in a month and I know a place where they sell it cheap...I've read som great reviews but you're the photo man


It really depends on what you planning on shooting, its not the ideal lense for clubs and its not that wide ( i love wides ).

But it has a great zoom nonetheless and IS helps alot.

are you going to B&H in NY?


Posted by starsearcher on Apr-25-2005 15:30:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
It really depends on what you planning on shooting, its not the ideal lense for clubs and its not that wide ( i love wides ).

But it has a great zoom nonetheless and IS helps alot.

are you going to B&H in NY?



Yep that's the one, they have some great prices on their websites. In terms on what I'm planning on shooting - I'm looking for more of a general lens to replace the 18-55mm that came with the rebel kit. I'm not planning on doing any club photography with it, more of a walkaround lens with a better range and quality. Either way I can't really spend too much at this time so if you have any other suggestions for this price range it'll be highly appreciated.


Posted by layloula on Apr-25-2005 15:43:

Yo celle de la brume et l immeuble est trop SICK Malek! Your pics are really awesome...the streets look like a hollywood set...foggy night, humid desert streets!!


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 15:51:

I would've get the 17-85 IS but its 200$ more expensive :/


Posted by starsearcher on Apr-25-2005 15:59:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
I would've get the 17-85 IS but its 200$ more expensive :/


Thanks Malek I'll investigate ....by the way (since I'm still leaning) how do you tell which ones are wider? (lower mm = wider?)


Posted by Marcus007 on Apr-25-2005 16:14:



Isn't that Charest's office building? I'm unsure, but if it is his office building, that evil smoke around it looks brilliant. hehehe


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 16:59:

quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Thanks Malek I'll investigate ....by the way (since I'm still leaning) how do you tell which ones are wider? (lower mm = wider?)


yes of course.

you can see what would the 28mm give on your camera by zooming your 18-55 lense to about half (maybe theres a marker at the 28 point).

At 17mm, you would get a bit of a wider image than your 18-55 at the 18mm marker.

a wide lense is very useful for the shots you saw in this thread.


Posted by starsearcher on Apr-25-2005 17:25:

Nice, thanks a lot Malek...were these taken with your Tamron lens?


Posted by malek on Apr-25-2005 17:27:

quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Nice, thanks a lot Malek...were these taken with your Tamron lens?


yes, my only lense atm.

but i don't recommend it.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.