TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Another plane crash in NYC
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by DJ Shibby on Oct-11-2006 20:04:

Another plane crash in NYC

Fox News reports that a plane flown by two Democrats has crashed into a NYC sky rise.


Posted by Sunsnail on Oct-11-2006 20:29:

no way... two democrats? link?


Posted by Renegade on Oct-11-2006 20:30:

I don't know guys, sounds a bit fishy to me. Look at the photographic evidence:



Cesnas have a wingspan of up to 12 meters and yet only two of the windows appear to be damaged. The large black streak up the side of the building would also seem to indicate that something with a combustable componant passed close to the building prior to impact - something like, oh I don't know, A MISSILE? Also the fire appears to be burning a little to strongly for one that was started by something as small as a Cesna don't you think...?

More details to come once I've made them up.


Posted by St_Andrew on Oct-11-2006 20:48:

^^ Not to mention the fact that we haven't seen a single video tape of any plane yet! And someone told me they heard someone who actually saw a missile so you are definitely up to something!

We also need to mention that the side of impact is actually the side which is towards manhattan, not towards the river! What kind of accident is that really!?

(Actually the last one is kind of serious )


Posted by Magnetonium on Oct-11-2006 20:52:



Holly shit ... the BUILDING MIGHT CRUMBLE INTO A NEAT PILE OF RUBBLE IN 8 SECONDS IF THE FIRE SPREADS TO SEVERAL FLOORS ... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA



Posted by Dj Alex (ISR) on Oct-11-2006 20:59:

the plane was owned by baseball player.


Posted by Shakka on Oct-11-2006 21:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Alex (ISR)
the plane was owned by baseball player.


And he's dead.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Oct-11-2006 21:13:

Quick!
Create an experiment with matchsticks to convey the structural integrity of the building!

Don't forget the kerosene for realistic effect!1!!


Posted by Yoepus on Oct-11-2006 22:11:

Actually the Mossad did this. If you will notice, no Jews were killed in this accident. They were all miraculously told to evacuate the building and did not show up to live/work there all day today.


Posted by josh4 on Oct-11-2006 23:20:

Amazingly, the high rise did not become the 4th building ever to collapse due to fire.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-11-2006 23:31:

lol, nice call renegade!


quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Holly shit ... the BUILDING MIGHT CRUMBLE INTO A NEAT PILE OF RUBBLE IN 8 SECONDS IF THE FIRE SPREADS TO SEVERAL FLOORS ... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


idiot. WTC7 didnt collapse in 8 seconds you ignorant twit.

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
Amazingly, the high rise did not become the 4th building ever to collapse due to fire.


dont be an equally ignorant twit


Posted by shaolin_Z on Oct-11-2006 23:40:

This thread is awesome ! ...and a good place to blow off some 9-11 discussion steam... Easy PKC, it's all in good fun .


Posted by shaolin_Z on Oct-11-2006 23:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
I don't know guys, sounds a bit fishy to me. Look at the photographic evidence:




And if you invert that image, you can clearly see a "6" with fires in three windows. 666!


Posted by josh4 on Oct-12-2006 00:26:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
dont be an equally ignorant twit

Thats it?! Wow! I mean I knew you were going to quote me, but I would have at least expected some sort of bait to argue into 5 pages after a slightly could-be conspiracy supporting maybe theory statement like that, possibly, or just humor, but its possible.

Hey pkc, the government was behind 9/11! EVERYBODY BACK, HES GOING TO BLOW!

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
This thread is awesome ! ...and a good place to blow off some 9-11 discussion steam... Easy PKC, it's all in good fun .

LOL YEAH!

Its always great to derive pastime humor from deaths of a few people. Think of their families! hahaha They must be so sad.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-12-2006 00:27:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
Thats it?! Wow! I mean I knew you were going to quote me, but I would have at least expected some sort of bait to argue into 5 pages after a slightly could-be conspiracy supporting maybe theory statement like that, possibly, or just humor, but its possible.


ive smashed you into the ground time and time again, i didnt really see the necessity of going at it yet again. unless of course you have something new to add to your collection of deceitful "evidence"?

humour is fine if it is actually funny. which you weren't


Posted by josh4 on Oct-12-2006 00:29:

^ wind him up and watch him spin!


Posted by shaolin_Z on Oct-12-2006 00:29:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4

LOL YEAH!

Its always great to derive pastime humor from deaths of a few people. Think of their families! hahaha They must be so sad.


Obviously I wasn't referring to that aspect.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-12-2006 00:38:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
^ wind him up and watch him spin!


damn straight. nothing gets my goat like dishonest stupidity. you my friend do a stellar job!


Posted by josh4 on Oct-12-2006 00:47:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
damn straight. nothing gets my goat like dishonest stupidity. you my friend do a stellar job!

We have only crossed paths once and I left because you kept making shit up about what I thought and believed that had no basis from the content of what I said. It was worse than Fox News.

Hey pkc, it was a military plane! Spin bitch, spin!


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-12-2006 00:53:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
We have only crossed paths once and I left because you kept making shit up about what I thought and believed that had no basis from the content of what I said. It was worse than Fox News.

Hey pkc, it was a military plane! Spin bitch, spin!


bullshit. you were asking disingenuous questions that clearly showed your actual position that you were unwilling to own up to. saying things like "its awfully convenient/suspicious/weird" when its none of those things made it pretty clear where you were coming from.

hey josh4, youre an idiot. dont spin, its just fact.


Posted by josh4 on Oct-12-2006 00:57:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
bullshit. you were asking disingenuous questions that clearly showed your actual position that you were unwilling to own up to. saying things like "its awfully convenient/suspicious/weird" when its none of those things made it pretty clear where you were coming from.

So because I was being unclear, thats validation to make shit up about what I actually do believe. Theres a word for this, oh right, truthiness.

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
hey josh4, youre an idiot. dont spin, its just fact.

Save your insults for the COR, maybe thats where you should stay. The teenagers there seem more along your lines of maturity and debating skills.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-12-2006 01:09:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
So because I was being unclear, thats validation to make shit up about what I actually do believe. Theres a word for this, oh right, truthiness.


i wasnt making up anything. i was making reasonable assumptions based upon the questions you were asking. if indeed i was incorrect, then one has to wonder why you were asking the questions in the first place. im sure i asked you a number of times to put an actual position forward, which you no doubt declined. not my fault if you were unwilling to argue a specific point, and merely chose to dance around the issue with irrelevant questions and half-truths. thats part and parcel of the 9/11 movement after all.


i love it. you accuse other people of putting words in your mouth when youre unwilling to use your own

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
Save your insults for the COR, maybe thats where you should stay. The teenagers there seem more along your lines of maturity and debating skills.


whatever. thus far i havent seen you produce anything thats deserving of better. and my debating skills are fine. go back and look at that thread if you wanna see your argument crushed and destroyed. oh im sorry, they werent your arguments were they? just innocent questions with nothing at all behind them


Posted by josh4 on Oct-12-2006 01:33:

Oh man, this guy is thicker than Peter Gallagher's eyebrows. Clearly I've been labeled a conspiracy theorist, not based on fact, but because its convient for you. What is this, Guantanamo? You must take your cues straight from the Administration. I'd habeas corpus your ass if it wasn't banned.

Hey pkc, it wasn't a plane, it was a missle! That should give you a few more hours to waste for no reason but your own misplaced pride.


Posted by Magnetonium on Oct-12-2006 01:36:



Holly crap! It was Cory Lidle's plane ... see MLB story here:

http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/...t=.jsp&c_id=mlb


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Oct-12-2006 01:42:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
Oh man, this guy is thicker than Peter Gallagher's eyebrows. Clearly I've been labeled a conspiracy theorist, not based on fact, but because its convient for you. What is this, Guantanamo? You must take your cues straight from the Administration. I'd habeas corpus your ass if it wasn't banned.


blah blah blah. you were the one spreading the CT (and defending CT) propaganda. asking questions that had been dealt with over and over again. why else would a lazy researcher be asking the same bullshit questions propogated by professional CTs?

if the cap fits.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.