What do you think of theses Logo's?

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- What do you think of theses Logo's?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by DJ_Ampz on Nov-25-2006 16:31:

What do you think of theses Logo's?

What do you like?

IF you could change things, what would you change. Im going to pick one of each, and possibly a "slim" version of each as well. These can be changed.

Thank you!!!!!

ps. the top ones are for my "House" label, the bottem ones are "Trance/Techno/Prog etc"

Ampz

Posted by VERTiG0 on Nov-25-2006 16:41:

Voted 3 and 8.

Posted by DJ_Science on Nov-25-2006 16:42:

4 and 8. I think 8 is by far the best.

Posted by Cribby on Nov-25-2006 16:57:

1 and 8. The lesser detail, the more appealing..imo.

Posted by SPANIARD on Nov-25-2006 17:04:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Science
I think 8 is by far the best.

Posted by lexxwolfen on Nov-25-2006 17:12:

picked 4 & 8

i'm so tempted to edit some of these in photoshop

Posted by goodnet on Nov-25-2006 17:25:

4 and 6

In my opinion, #8 is not unique at all and does nothing to stand out in my mind. The microphone icon somehow does, though.

Posted by Jem_hadar on Nov-25-2006 17:28:

1 and 6.

FUCK! Breasts. I wish the Techno label had breasts.

Posted by smuncky on Nov-25-2006 17:38:

7 is my favoritr.very original

Posted by VERTiG0 on Nov-25-2006 17:41:

Did anyone else notice that #8 says "AMPFIED" instead of amplified?

Posted by lexxwolfen on Nov-25-2006 17:47:

quote:
Originally posted by VERTiG0
Did anyone else notice that #8 says "AMPFIED" instead of amplified?

yep

Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Nov-25-2006 18:21:

quote:
Originally posted by VERTiG0
Did anyone else notice that #8 says "AMPFIED" instead of amplified?

hahaha I love you

Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Nov-25-2006 18:22:

ps I picked 4 and 8...I prefer 8 though

Posted by sticky_shoes on Nov-25-2006 18:25:

I honestly didn't like any of them...

Ampz...the one on your avatar is wicked though...why not use that one instead or something similar?

Posted by Tordan on Nov-25-2006 18:34:

4 and 7

Posted by DJ_Ampz on Nov-25-2006 18:53:

quote:
Originally posted by sticky_shoes
I honestly didn't like any of them...

Ampz...the one on your avatar is wicked though...why not use that one instead or something similar?

Actually thats a good idea. Ill see if we can incorporate it in to the logo maybe

Posted by DJ_Ampz on Nov-25-2006 18:55:

quote:
Originally posted by VERTiG0
Did anyone else notice that #8 says "AMPFIED" instead of amplified?

So I guess I hace to put you on payrol eh as my secretary....biotch lol. See how many speling mistakes are in their

Ampz

PS IF YOU LIKE ONE AND THINK OF A CHANGE, POST THE IDEA.

Posted by activate on Nov-25-2006 19:00:

number 8 is terrible... looks so plain and generic... it screams boring. maybe if the colours were changed it would look better.. needs more contrast.

either way... looks like a grade 9 art student made it.

Posted by Playa24_7 on Nov-25-2006 19:33:

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
ps I picked 4 and 8...I prefer 8 though

top ones are for the house label, the bottom are for the trance, so you have to pick the best for each label, not just one logo overall

Posted by DarkAngel on Nov-25-2006 19:35:

Voted for 8.

Posted by geroin on Nov-25-2006 19:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Cribby
1 and 8. The lesser detail, the more appealing..imo.

exactly
1,8 but ill add 6 to that because it looks original

Posted by smuncky on Nov-25-2006 19:40:

quote:
Originally posted by activate
number 8 is terrible... looks so plain and generic... it screams boring. maybe if the colours were changed it would look better.. needs more contrast.

either way... looks like a grade 9 art student made it.

exactly...took the words right out of my mouth

Posted by limin_li on Nov-25-2006 22:19:

number 8 mon ami.....

Posted by AdReNaLiNa on Nov-25-2006 22:54:

I really like 4... for the second one, I would go with 7 or 8

Posted by phlog on Nov-25-2006 23:41:

#1 is hawt! i like the minimalist feel to it

maybe too much focus on the girl though, could be missleading

#6 is also solid imo

Pages (2): [1] 2 »