My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- My taste in music is better than your taste in music.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by Dean Millson on Apr-27-2007 06:15:

My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

It is.

Because i say it is.

And the fact that you say it isn't, is even more reason for me to say that it actually is.

OK?

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-27-2007 06:17:

ahhahaahaha.

ahhh dean making funnies!

but seriously, i dont think music is just down to what one is into. there are rules to music and as such SOME (and i mean only some) music can be considered better than other songs in the same genre.

for instance, a singer that sings in tune is better than one that cant

Posted by Darkarbiter on Apr-27-2007 06:22:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
ahhahaahaha.

ahhh dean making funnies!

but seriously, i dont think music is just down to what one is into. there are rules to music and as such SOME (and i mean only some) music can be considered better than other songs in the same genre.

for instance, a singer that sings in tune is better than one that cant

Well if it is done with proper samples and is in time with the song and is done to be unique and works well then maybe it is better

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-27-2007 06:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Darkarbiter
Well if it is done with proper samples and is in time with the song and is done to be unique and works well then maybe it is better

eh? are you seriously arguing someone that cant sing in tune is better than one that can? lol.

Posted by Light The Fuse on Apr-27-2007 06:25:

is this how it works - like i dunno im just gunna put this out there..

techno percussion is uaually a lot more detailed than trance percussion
tecnho basslines are usually a lot more solid
trance melodies are usually quite simple and lack subtlety...whereas tech melodies are usually (if there) subtle and complex....

does this mean techno is better?
and if so and i know this - why do i still enjoy a GOOD piece of trance (usually prog/psy) over a GOOD piece of techno?

why?

Posted by Dean Millson on Apr-27-2007 06:25:

Oh for fucks sake pkc, why choose this thread to be serious for the first time this year?

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-27-2007 06:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
Oh for fucks sake pkc, why choose this thread to be serious for the first time this year?

hahahaha. must be getting tired.

ok then, trance is the only genre of edm that doesn't suck donkeys dicks. if i wanted to listen to repetitive nonsense, id go hang out in the industrial zone and listen to cars getting made.

happy now dean?

thats it for me kids, hope everyone has a good weekend!

except you lilith. youre a dirty SA cvnt.

Posted by Lilith on Apr-27-2007 06:32:

Least I'm not the product of inbreeding you grotty little Tasmanian peasant.

I have crap taste in music, it's a consensus of many.

Posted by deceptikon on Apr-27-2007 06:57:

Uplifting trance pwns all, end of thread, thanks.

Posted by Deeman on Apr-27-2007 07:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
I have crap taste in music, it's a consensus of many.

But if I also have crap taste in music, who's crap is crappier?

I reckon mine is crappier because i've been listening to crap for longer than you therefore it only stands to reason my crap is WAY more crappier than your crap!! My music is the crapperest

P.S I know everything!!

Posted by James Brooke on Apr-27-2007 07:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Light The Fuse
why do i still enjoy a GOOD piece of trance (usually prog/psy) over a GOOD piece of techno?

why?

because your ears prefer to hear trance...

genre wars can never be won, you just have to accept that different people like different music, and then move on

Posted by Dean Millson on Apr-27-2007 07:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Deeman
But if I also have crap taste in music, who's crap is crapper?

I reckon mine is crapper because i've been listening to crap for longer than you therefore it only stands to reason my crap is WAY more crapper than you crap!! My music is the crapperest

P.S I know everything!!

I like where you're going with that actually

It's probably how it usually goes over at emoaddict.com

Posted by Deeman on Apr-27-2007 07:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
I like where you're going with that actually

It's probably how it usually goes over at emoaddict.com

emoaddict.com

GOLD!

Posted by Darkarbiter on Apr-27-2007 07:41:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
eh? are you seriously arguing someone that cant sing in tune is better than one that can? lol.

Look up the meaning of the word maybe.

Posted by MiSSyM on Apr-27-2007 08:19:

quote:
Originally posted by James Brooke
genre wars can never be won, you just have to accept that different people like different music, and then move on

exactly!

Posted by narcism on Apr-27-2007 08:27:

faithless own u all
/end thread

Posted by Philby on Apr-27-2007 10:18:

Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
It is.

Because i say it is.

And the fact that you say it isn't, is even more reason for me to say that it actually is.

OK?

except when your taste in music is fucking stupid electro minimal bullshit whatever the fuck you want to call it crap that sounds like someone had too much of their illicit substance of choice and thought it would be a great idea to add a weak kick to some looped samples of the music from fucking frogger or pacman or some other 80's midi noise. then your taste in music is not better than anybody else's by default.

Posted by Dean Millson on Apr-27-2007 23:58:

Re: Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
except when your taste in music is fucking stupid electro minimal bullshit whatever the fuck you want to call it crap that sounds like someone had too much of their illicit substance of choice and thought it would be a great idea to add a weak kick to some looped samples of the music from fucking frogger or pacman or some other 80's midi noise. then your taste in music is not better than anybody else's by default.

Do you ever feel like you've missed the point Philby?

Posted by Teflon_Teapot on Apr-28-2007 00:38:

phil really is on the angry pills at the moment and it is hilarious

Posted by Paulie on Apr-28-2007 01:03:

Re: Re: Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
Do you ever feel like you've missed the point Philby?

LOL i think you missed the point... Maybe philby hit the spot!!!

Posted by Wasted_Space on Apr-28-2007 01:19:

No! Shampoo is better!

Posted by Aesthetic on Apr-28-2007 03:33:

Re: Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

fucken river raid, and river raid 2!

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
except when your taste in music is fucking stupid electro minimal bullshit whatever the fuck you want to call it crap that sounds like someone had too much of their illicit substance of choice and thought it would be a great idea to add a weak kick to some looped samples of the music from fucking frogger or pacman or some other 80's midi noise. then your taste in music is not better than anybody else's by default.

Posted by Dean Millson on Apr-28-2007 03:59:

Re: Re: Re: Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

quote:
Originally posted by Paulie
LOL i think you missed the point... Maybe philby hit the spot!!!

Haha. No, i think the fact that you've popped your head in here illustrates i didn't at all

Posted by Deeman on Apr-28-2007 04:37:

Re: Re: Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

quote:
Originally posted by Aesthetic
fucken river raid, and river raid 2!

Pitfall and Berzerk

Posted by Philby on Apr-28-2007 05:32:

Re: Re: Re: My taste in music is better than your taste in music.

quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
Do you ever feel like you've missed the point Philby?

I never miss the point.

extra wink for you

Pages (2): [1] 2 »