TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- What’s the difference between prostitution and someone that participates in a porno?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by hooknife on Jan-05-2008 04:37:

What’s the difference between prostitution and someone that participates in a porno?

Why is one legal and one is not?

In the United States I can't really come up with a good answer other than one is being filmed and one is not.


Posted by LoveHate on Jan-05-2008 04:39:

PROSTITUTION IS ADVERTISING YOURSELF IN PUBLIC? I THINK THAT MIGHT BE THE DIFFERENCE.


NOT SURE THOUGH.


Posted by Lira on Jan-05-2008 04:39:

One is being paid for pleasure, and the other is providing virgins educational material. I think we can all agree that the latter is a good person, and the former is most certainly committing a crime


Posted by hooknife on Jan-05-2008 04:40:

quote:
Originally posted by LoveHate
PROSTITUTION IS ADVERTISING YOURSELF IN PUBLIC? I THINK THAT MIGHT BE THE DIFFERENCE.


Is that a crime?


Posted by RandomGirl on Jan-05-2008 04:55:

That's a good question.

In my first year philosophy class, we had a heated debate about it.

I think it was decided that if one is legal, the other should be legal too, as both are pretty much the same thing.


Posted by jonze on Jan-05-2008 04:56:

one has a pimp and the other doesn't


Posted by JD8180 on Jan-05-2008 04:56:

it's hard to tax.


Posted by Frenchie on Jan-05-2008 05:17:

quote:
Originally posted by jonze
one has a pimp and the other doesn't


Pimp = boss
A porn star has a boss, there for he is her/his pimp.


Posted by chimera66 on Jan-05-2008 05:27:

prostitution is legal in parts of the united states. there is an entire show about a brothel in nevada on hbo (i think or some other cable channel)


Posted by Spike on Jan-05-2008 05:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
Pimp = manager
A porn star has a manager, there for he is her/his pimp.


Posted by RandomGirl on Jan-05-2008 06:06:

As long as you call yourself an "escort" here in Canada, it is legal.

Although... they do say you aren't supposed to engage in sexual activity, but they do say that if you choose to have sex with a client on your own time, then it's all cool.

LOL!


Posted by Frenchie on Jan-05-2008 06:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Spike
right, sorry lol


Posted by Zewad on Jan-05-2008 06:32:

One is performing, the other is physical interaction with the paying customer.


Posted by RandomGirl on Jan-05-2008 06:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Zewad
One is performing, the other is physical interaction with the paying customer.


Umm, they are BOTH performing.


Posted by Simon on Jan-05-2008 07:05:

I think it's down to who's charging.


Posted by Arbiter on Jan-05-2008 07:28:

Re: What’s the difference between prostitution and someone that participates in a porno?

quote:
Originally posted by hooknife
Why is one legal and one is not?

In the United States I can't really come up with a good answer other than one is being filmed and one is not.


The courts consider most pornography to fall under the first amendment, and since the "speech" is the act of sex between the two actors, it cannot be rendered illegal by prostitution laws.

Even if that weren't the case, it seems to me to be faulty logic to conclude that what is being paid for, when pornographic actors and actresses are paid, is the act of sex itself. Rather, the payment is in exchange for the right to film the act as a means to generate revenue -- that is, the sex is in this case a "means to an end" rather than the end itself (as is the case in prostitution.)


Posted by BTG on Jan-05-2008 07:37:

i think its there to protect the hookers themselves.

porn studio is a pretty controled enviornment, and all actors/actresses are tested regularly.

with street secks, anything goes, rates are anywhere and who knows who's spreading what. plus you ight have alot more dead hookers.

then again the agrument could be 'well if it was legal it'd be controlled and what not'

i can't answer that :/


Posted by mezzir on Jan-05-2008 08:16:

Re: Re: What’s the difference between prostitution and someone that participates in a

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
The courts consider most pornography to fall under the first amendment, and since the "speech" is the act of sex between the two actors, it cannot be rendered illegal by prostitution laws.

Even if that weren't the case, it seems to me to be faulty logic to conclude that what is being paid for, when pornographic actors and actresses are paid, is the act of sex itself. Rather, the payment is in exchange for the right to film the act as a means to generate revenue -- that is, the sex is in this case a "means to an end" rather than the end itself (as is the case in prostitution.)

yeah, thats what i was gonna say, but worded far better


Posted by idoru on Jan-05-2008 09:59:

Re: Re: Re: What’s the difference between prostitution and someone that participates

quote:
Originally posted by mezzir
yeah, thats what i was gonna say, but worded far better


Likewise.


Posted by Ian on Jan-05-2008 11:55:

I was gonna say about 500 dollars an hour


Posted by Boomer187 on Jan-05-2008 15:43:

quote:
Originally posted by BTG
i think its there to protect the hookers themselves.

porn studio is a pretty controled enviornment, and all actors/actresses are tested regularly.

with street secks, anything goes, rates are anywhere and who knows who's spreading what. plus you ight have alot more dead hookers.

then again the agrument could be 'well if it was legal it'd be controlled and what not'

i can't answer that :/



yea, if it was legal then it would be like in nevada, very controlled and safe.


Posted by The Master on Jan-05-2008 16:18:

they both work for a final client. however one client can get infected by STD, the other cannot.


Posted by Direct on Jan-05-2008 16:37:

This thread makes me horny


Posted by Nicolas Oliver on Jan-05-2008 20:35:

Prostitution isn't illegal in Canada; everything related to it, however, is.


Posted by Krypton on Jan-05-2008 20:54:

Both should be legal as both are victimless crimes; where no person's rights (life, liberty, or property) are infringed upon.

But for some reason in "the land of the free", the government criminalizes behavior that which is victimless. All parties are willing participants! Granted, both should heavily regulated, but in a purely legal sense, they should be decriminalized.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.