TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- This is the "freedom" our soldiers are fighting for?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by daves on Jan-31-2008 13:12:

This is the "freedom" our soldiers are fighting for?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...hts-775972.html


Sentenced to death: Afghan who dared to read about women's rights

By Kim Sengupta
Thursday, 31 January 2008


A young man, a student of journalism, is sentenced to death by an Islamic court for downloading a report from the internet. The sentence is then upheld by the country's rulers. This is Afghanistan � not in Taliban times but six years after "liberation" and under the democratic rule of the West's ally Hamid Karzai.


The fate of Sayed Pervez Kambaksh has led to domestic and international protests, and deepening concern about erosion of civil liberties in Afghanistan. He was accused of blasphemy after he downloaded a report from a Farsi website which stated that Muslim fundamentalists who claimed the Koran justified the oppression of women had misrepresented the views of the prophet Mohamed.

Mr Kambaksh, 23, distributed the tract to fellow students and teachers at Balkh University with the aim, he said, of provoking a debate on the matter. But a complaint was made against him and he was arrested, tried by religious judges without � say his friends and family � being allowed legal representation and sentenced to death.

The Independent is launching a campaign today to secure justice for Mr Kambaksh. The UN, human rights groups, journalists' organisations and Western diplomats have urged Mr Karzai's government to intervene and free him. But the Afghan Senate passed a motion yesterday confirming the death sentence.

The MP who proposed the ruling condemning Mr Kambaksh was Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, a key ally of Mr Karzai. The Senate also attacked the international community for putting pressure on the Afghan government and urged Mr Karzai not to be influenced by outside un-Islamic views.

The case of Mr Kambaksh, who also worked a s reporter for the Jahan-i-Naw (New World) newspaper, is seen in Afghanistan as yet another chapter in the escalation in the confrontation between Afghanistan and the West.

It comes in the wake of Mr Karzai accusing the British of actually worsening the situation in Helmand province by their actions and his subsequent blocking of the appointment of Lord Ashdown as the UN envoy and expelling a British and an Irish diplomat.

Demonstrations, organised by clerics, against the alleged foreign interference have been held in the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif, where Mr Kambaksh was arrested. Aminuddin Muzafari, the first secretary of the houses of parliament, said: "People should realise that as we are representatives of an Islamic country therefore we can never tolerate insults to reverences of Islamic religion."

At a gathering in Takhar province, Maulavi Ghulam Rabbani Rahmani, the heads of the Ulema council, said: "We want the government and the courts to execute the court verdict on Kambaksh as soon as possible." In Parwan province, another senior cleric, Maulavi Muhammad Asif, said: "This decision is for disrespecting the holy Koran and the government should enforce the decision before it came under more pressure from foreigners."

UK officials say they are particularly concerned about such draconian action being taken against a journalist. The Foreign Office and Department for International Development has donated large sums to the training of media workers in the country. The Government funds the Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) in the Helmand capital, Lashkar Gar.

Mr Kambaksh's brother, Sayed Yaqub Ibrahimi, is also a journalist and has written articles for IWPR in which he accused senior public figures, including an MP, of atrocities, including murders. He said: "Of course we are all very worried about my brother. What has happened to him is very unjust. He has not committed blasphemy and he was not even allowed to have a legal defence. and what took place was a secret trial."

Qayoum Baabak, the editor of Jahan-i-Naw, said a senior prosecutor in Mazar-i-Sharif, Hafiz Khaliqyar, had warned journalists that they would be punished if they protested against the death sentence passed on Mr Kambaksh.

Jean MacKenzie, country director for IWPR, said: "We feel very strongly that this is designed to put pressure on Pervez's brother, Yaqub, who has done some of the hardest-hitting pieces outlining abuses by some very powerful commanders."

Rahimullah Samander, the president of the Afghan Independent Journalists' Association, said: "This is unfair, this is illegal. He just printed a copy of something and looked at it and read it. How can we believe in this 'democracy' if we can't even read, we can't even study? We are asking Mr Karzai to quash the death sentence before it is too late."

The circumstances surrounding the conviction of Mr Kambaksh are also being viewed as a further attempt to claw back the rights gained by women since the overthrow of the Taliban. The most prominent female MP, Malalai Joya, has been suspended after criticising her male colleagues.

Under the Afghan constitution, say legal experts, Mr Kambaksh has the right to appeal to the country's supreme court. Some senior clerics maintain, however, that since he has been convicted under religious laws, the supreme court should not bring secular interpretations to the case.

Mr Karzai has the right to intervene and pardon Mr Kambaksh. However, even if he is freed, it would be hard for the student to escape retribution in a country where fundamentalists and warlords are increasingly in the ascendancy.

How you can save Pervez

Sayed Pervez Kambaksh's imminent execution is an affront to civilised values. It is not, however, a foregone conclusion. If enough international pressure is brought to bear on President Karzai's government, his sentence may yet be overturned. Add your weight to the campaign by urging the Foreign Office to demand that his life be spared. Sign our e-petition at www.independent.co.uk/petition


----------------------------------------------

"meet the new boss, same as the old boss."


Posted by TheVrk on Jan-31-2008 13:20:

Wow
This comes after yesterday i saw reports on both CNN and BBC that Afghanistan is on the brink of becoming
YET AGAIN a "failed state".


Posted by zokissima on Jan-31-2008 13:23:

*sigh*

I may be wrong, but reading what direction that country is going in, it seems that one fundamentalist state is just being replaced by another. I can see Islam being used as a form of fighting foreign influence and washout of the Afghani culture, but at the same time I can never agree with anything pertaining to killing in the name of religion.


Posted by TheVrk on Jan-31-2008 13:30:

quote:
Originally posted by zokissima
I can never agree with anything pertaining to killing in the name of religion.

No way, me either...
The prophet Mohammed and Islam itself were not intended to be used in this disgusting way


Posted by thesauce23 on Jan-31-2008 13:32:

Re: This is the "freedom" our soldiers are fighting for?

"Civilization is crumbling"


Posted by daves on Jan-31-2008 13:41:

you almost have to ask yourself after reading about something like this -- is this what we should look forward to with Iraq as well?

for all the hype and rhetoric about getting rid of evil rulers and freeing peoples who have suffered a lack of freedoms and rights... are we allowing the old guard to be replaced with more of the old guard?


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-31-2008 13:58:

IMO we shouldn't be sticking our noses where they don't belong.


Posted by Gypsy on Jan-31-2008 14:05:

wow....reading this is one of those things that makes you take a deep breath and sigh at how unfair and incomprehensible a situation can be. imagine how much trouble most of us would have been in long ago for encountering information the government didn't want us to know.

it's funny. reading something like that and then coming across an article about our oh-so-enlightened american counterparts:

(via digg)
http://www.sixhoursaweek.com/2008/0...-news.html#more


Posted by zokissima on Jan-31-2008 14:21:

quote:
Originally posted by daves
for all the hype and rhetoric about getting rid of evil rulers and freeing peoples who have suffered a lack of freedoms and rights... are we allowing the old guard to be replaced with more of the old guard?

Yeah but that makes the assumption that the primary reason for blatantly invading a foreign country is to apparently "get rid of evil rulers". I mean, you can't honestly buy into that so simply can you?

ChemEnhanced, I hear ya..


Posted by Yohan on Jan-31-2008 14:57:

It's no different than some of the whacked up loonie stuff you read about fundamentalist Christians or some nutty cults in Western worlds.
Or other stupid govt laws we hear about in the news

Nobody ever said Afghanistan is going to get fixed over night


Posted by exstasie on Jan-31-2008 15:09:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
IMO we shouldn't be sticking our noses where they don't belong.



Exactly. Let them deal with their own problems.


If they can't fix, tough luck on them. That's their own fault.


Posted by eRRaTiK on Jan-31-2008 15:10:

quote:
Originally posted by daves
you almost have to ask yourself after reading about something like this -- is this what we should look forward to with Iraq as well?

for all the hype and rhetoric about getting rid of evil rulers and freeing peoples who have suffered a lack of freedoms and rights... are we allowing the old guard to be replaced with more of the old guard?


We all know by now that the US weren't/aren't there (in Afghanistan or any other country for that matter) for humanitarian reasons so they should stop pretending that they were/are. We should be asking who or what was being liberated?

Had the allied forces intervened and empowered the people to take control of their own government and fight for democracy/freedom then maybe it would have been a different scenario. It doesn't appear that way.

Either way change needs to come from within.


Posted by zokissima on Jan-31-2008 15:11:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
Exactly. Let them deal with their own problems.

If they can't fix, tough luck on them. That's their own fault.

If that's the case, why the hell do we have troops stationed there in the first place?


Posted by exstasie on Jan-31-2008 15:12:

quote:
Originally posted by zokissima
If that's the case, why the hell do we have troops stationed there in the first place?


Beats me. Pressure from the US? UN? Boost the economy?



We all know how the US can get out of their recession. Just invade Syria or something and declare war on them...


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-31-2008 15:15:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
Exactly. Let them deal with their own problems.


If they can't fix, tough luck on them. That's their own fault.


While I somewhat agree, you must keep in mind that the ramifications of their not being able to fix their own problems can affect us and/or our allies. What you've stated is tantamount to saying... "let the poor fend for themselves," which is all well and good until they start fending for themselves by robbing your house.


Posted by exstasie on Jan-31-2008 15:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
While I somewhat agree, you must keep in mind that the ramifications of their not being able to fix their own problems can affect us and/or our allies. What you've stated is tantamount to saying... "let the poor fend for themselves," which is all well and good until they start fending for themselves by robbing your house.


Yes..thats true so then you build a defence system to keep them out.

I know everyone wants to create the peaceful global world where we all live in harmony but realistically speaking, that will never happen with such conflicting views of life.


Posted by eRRaTiK on Jan-31-2008 15:19:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
I know everyone wants to create the peaceful global world where we all live in harmony but realistically speaking, that will never happen when the nation with the strongest military has ulterior motives


fixed, IMO.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-31-2008 15:20:

quote:
Originally posted by zokissima
If that's the case, why the hell do we have troops stationed there in the first place?


We are members of NATO. NATO has a mutual defence pact, which holds that if one member of NATO is attacked all others are to come to their defence. The US was attacked by a group that was supported, fostered, and sheltered by the Afgaistan government of the day. Since the US is also a member of NATO we were obliged to come to their defence. The decision to join the mission to oust the Taliban was the correct one. We continue to have troops in the theater because withdrawing now will most certainly result in the Taliban again holding power, which is likely to result in another attack down the road, requiring another invasion.

You cannot go into a country, create a vacuum of power, then leave and expect it not to bite you in the ass later.


Posted by eRRaTiK on Jan-31-2008 15:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
We continue to have troops in the theater because withdrawing now will most certainly result in the Taliban again holding power, which is likely to result in another attack down the road, requiring another invasion.


so the question remains, how long and what is being done to allow Afghanistan to stand on its own two feet?


Posted by capo tutti di on Jan-31-2008 15:23:

quote:
Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
IMO we shouldn't be sticking our noses where they don't belong.



+1 on that...it's useless and a waste of life and time, not the people of Afghanistan, but the politics and state of mind of the governments, opposition or otherwise.


Which one of our soldiers have died a hero, honestly? It's all been a terrible instance of ambush, "friendly fire" or miscommunication.

Really outside of actually being in the middle east as a soldier what threat does Afghanistan pose to us on our native soil?

IMO just leave them let them sort it out, if that means rebel forces well then i guess that's what happens...if that were to happen the rebels would likely become bolder and try to push their borders and territories and neighboring countries would likely come in and be as ruthless as the Afghans and regulate.

Sounds medieval? perhaps but this is the way these people are living now, Europe and Asia sorted themselves out this way centuries ago, without any help of forces half a world away..

In Layman's Terms.....

I GEEVE


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-31-2008 15:25:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
Yes..thats true so then you build a defence system to keep them out.


Unfortunately, the lifestyle we demand is diametrically opposed to the measures that would have to be put in place to create the defence system required to safeguard us from this method of attack. Since we are unwilling to change our lifestyles we are forced to find another method of defence. In this case it appears that the best defence is a strong offence.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-31-2008 15:34:

quote:
Originally posted by eRRaTiK
so the question remains, how long and what is being done to allow Afghanistan to stand on its own two feet?


How long is a question I don't think anyone is sure of the answer to. What is being done... much; building infrastructure, training and equiping a military and police force, trying to build the institutions of democracy. Will it all work? I don't know, likely not, but we do have a duty of care to ourselves and the citizens of Afganistan to give it our level best effort.


Posted by capo tutti di on Jan-31-2008 15:48:

.


Posted by Yohan on Jan-31-2008 16:46:

Gah... So many posts to answer to, but I'll quickly hit on a few for now.

quote:
Originally posted by capo tutti di
+1 on that...it's useless and a waste of life and time, not the people of Afghanistan, but the politics and state of mind of the governments, opposition or otherwise.


Which one of our soldiers have died a hero, honestly? It's all been a terrible instance of ambush, "friendly fire" or miscommunication.

CF is composed of volunteers. So people sign up, knowing what they are getting into.

These soldiers died as 'heroes' by doing their duty. Doesn't matter how they died.

There is no 'heroic' way to die in war.
quote:

Really outside of actually being in the middle east as a soldier what threat does Afghanistan pose to us on our native soil?

You do know that Canadian way of life is pretty much everything that Osama and his band of loonies is completely against? Considering Canada is part of NATO, have free democracy, freedom of speech, religion, whatnot, I don't think fundamentalist Muslims don't like us much.

Face the facts, folks. Not everyone loves Canadians.

quote:

IMO just leave them let them sort it out, if that means rebel forces well then i guess that's what happens...if that were to happen the rebels would likely become bolder and try to push their borders and territories and neighboring countries would likely come in and be as ruthless as the Afghans and regulate.

Sounds medieval? perhaps but this is the way these people are living now, Europe and Asia sorted themselves out this way centuries ago, without any help of forces half a world away..

21st century politics and public pressure don't let wars happen easily.


Posted by capo tutti di on Jan-31-2008 16:59:

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Gah... So many posts to answer to, but I'll quickly hit on a few for now.


CF is composed of volunteers. So people sign up, knowing what they are getting into.

These soldiers died as 'heroes' by doing their duty. Doesn't matter how they died.

There is no 'heroic' way to die in war.

You do know that Canadian way of life is pretty much everything that Osama and his band of loonies is completely against? Considering Canada is part of NATO, have free democracy, freedom of speech, religion, whatnot, I don't think fundamentalist Muslims don't like us much.

Face the facts, folks. Not everyone loves Canadians.


21st century politics and public pressure don't let wars happen easily.



Bravo!! Nice Rebuttal

Still I feel no direct threat from the country of Afghanistan, and i'm not including Muslim fundamentalist's because they can be born and bred anywhere...the country its self is not loved by many if any...and from a military standpoint?? I guess theres not much to say about that


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.