TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- A true noob question
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
A true noob question
Okay, I'm a classical pianist by training.
I want to begin producing dance music, especially Trance.
I asked a question about what a Trance track consists of, and I got some very thorough, thoughtful answers.
But I have a vocabulary problem.
WTF is a "breakdown"??
lol
Re: A true noob question
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance Okay, I'm a classical pianist by training. I want to begin producing dance music, especially Trance. I asked a question about what a Trance track consists of, and I got some very thorough, thoughtful answers. But I have a vocabulary problem. WTF is a "breakdown"?? |
Even worse, he even said the breakdowns were highlighted...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Subtle There are really NO rules here. It all depens on what kind of trance track you are going to make, here are three Trance tracks, with main part breakdowns colored yellow, you`ll notice the timing and length of the break is different on all of them. Be creative, do what feels natural for you. |
| quote: |
| Why didn't you just ask it in the thread you already started? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance Because the other thread was about the structure of a Trance piece. This thread is about the definition of a word. It was off-topic and not appropriate to that thread. If you will revisit my response to the example posted, you'll see. Just because you say "this is a breakdown" and play me one, it doesn't mean that I know what one is. Try this: What does the fkn word mean? What is a breakdown? I have heard them, but what is it? How do you make it? I mean, really, guys, c'mon. Is this REALLY rocket science? |
In the context of mainstream anthem trance, a "breakdown" is where most of the percussive sounds, especially the kick, are absent for around one to three minutes while the melodic sounds build some kind of tension. Most of the time in "anthem" trance, the "tension" will be created simply by raising the cutoff frequency of the filters on the main melody and pad sounds, introducing lots of high frequencies into the track. When the filter cutoff is at its highest, the breakdown is ended by bringing all of the percussion back in at full force.
If you don't know what a cutoff frequency is, just Google "lowpass filter audio" or something similar and start reading up.
Hey Ray:
I appreciate that the written language isn't exactly your strong suit.
If you don't understand the question I'm asking then maybe you should just shut the fuck up.
If you'll read back a little (again, not your strong suit apparently) you'll see that I've been listening to this music for years!
I don't learn by just listening. I don't believe you do either.
Since you're so fuckin smart, you must be rich with all your crazy success in the music biz, no?
MrJiveBoJingles:
Thanks very much.
I know my questions are really noob-ish. What can I say, I'm a true newbie.
Thanks for your patience and for your great answers.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance Hey Ray: I appreciate that the written language isn't exactly your strong suit. If you don't understand the question I'm asking then maybe you should just shut the fuck up. If you'll read back a little (again, not your strong suit apparently) you'll see that I've been listening to this music for years! I don't learn by just listening. I don't believe you do either. Since you're so fuckin smart, you must be rich with all your crazy success in the music biz, no? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance I don't learn by just listening. I don't believe you do either. |
| quote: |
| Listen - Analyze - Recreate - Then create your own. |

Yep, Ray, you just got me pegged spot on, don't you.
I bet you were the kind of guy who flunked out of math because that stupid teacher just didn't know what the hell she was talkin' about, weren't ya'.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance That's not *JUST listening*. ![]() I get what you're saying, and I agree 100%. The analysis bit is only possible when you understand what you're hearing, wouldn't you agree? Seems to me that if you have, at least, a basic understanding of what the contituent parts are of a song, then you'll have an easier time creating one. If you just listen and imitate, I can see where it would take years and years and years, and maybe you develop an artistic voice, maybe you don't. Thanks, everyone. |
Well said!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance Yep, Ray, you just got me pegged spot on, don't you. I bet you were the kind of guy who flunked out of math because that stupid teacher just didn't know what the hell she was talkin' about, weren't ya'. |
| quote: |
| If you knew me at all you'd be aware of how ridiculous the criticisms regarding my financial situation and math skills are. |
| quote: |
| I still believe dropping a track in a sequencer to visually analyze what you are hearing is helpful. Take a couple passes at a track you know well - one you've heard a hundred times - and listen to every minor detail, then take another pass and watch what you're listening to. Use a similar view to what is posted above and you'll see some of structural changes as the song progresses and hear what that means simultaneously. |
You should be able to find all the tracks you want at Beatport.com. You can get them online, download them in mp3 or wav format, and drop them as a new track in FL. What you are seeing in the pic above is that... it's a few tracks that have been dropped into a sequencer in their entirety. When you zoom out to see the full track you'll see the peaks, breakdowns, buildups, and it's easy to keep looping a particular section to hear what's going on.
If you do decide to remake a track, or even start building a structure around another song, just keep the track in your song (muted) and you can use it to reference easily.
Hope that helps.
Very cool!
Thanks, Ray!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance Very cool! Thanks, Ray! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Khayat Much better Take it easy guys its just music |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dragontrance Very cool! Thanks, Ray! |
What a thread.
Alright, I have a guess... I'm thinking the big disconnect here is he has not seen music in the visual format presented by a .WAV editor, the time/amplitude look that we're so used to seeing.
dragontrance, you'll want to get your hands on a a .wav file editor. .wav file format is the uncompressed audio file format that holds highest common sonic fidelity. When you use samples in a DAW or a sampler, typically it is playing back .wav files. The pictures shown above are what .wav files look like when you load them into a .wav editor, but zoomed WAY out. When you zoom in, it appears as a complex logarithmic waveform. The wider & rounder the wave, usually the more bass frequencies you'll hear if you played it. Brief, jagged waveforms typically represent high frequency components. Things like high hats and vocals and lead synthesizers.
Running horizontally in the middle of a panel is a straight line which represents the X axis. The X axis represents time.
Running vertically is the Y axis, which represents amplitude. Amplitude runs upwards and downwards, from the X axis.
Roughly, the thinner the blue waveform is along the x axis, the less things are going on in the music, especially low frequencies. It's (sort of) quieter. So in the yellow highlighted areas, thats why it's smaller than the other parts - no drums, other musical pieces drop out. Less total amplitude in the song. In dance music, this is synonymous with the breakdown - It's components are being taken out, pieces are falling off, fading out.
Someone hook this kid up with SoundForge or CoolEdit or whatever you folks are using these days.
He can just download Audacity for free...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles He can just download Audacity for free... |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.