TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Ableton vs. frooty loops
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Ableton vs. frooty loops
okay i've messed with frooty loops. I'm seriously considering purchasing Ableton. How different are the two?
<<<
and ableton pro's
Isn't it "fruity", or was that just an attempt at humor?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Stef De Roux Isn't it "fruity", or was that just an attempt at humor? |
And FL stands for what? 
this isn't a question you should be asking, there are demos available for both products which you can try and decide upon. if that doesn't make you decide then asking on forums really won't either. it's whatever you're comfortable with more.
/dickhead
i know this guy... whatever the sequencer du jour (sp?) is, he buys... he has registered copies of:
FLStudio
Ableton Live
Nuendo
Cubase (yes cubase and nuendo, what a retard)
Reason
Pro Tools
just guess how proficient he is with all of them
david
| quote: |
| Originally posted by mysticalninja And FL stands for what? |
bashing on another person's daw is very much the same as the old pc vs mac battle thingie...
retarded...
in either case, all that matters is what you can do with the tools you are using.
david
Yeah, just try the demos and find out what your comfortable with, personally im a fan of both, although i mainly use ableton nowadays, but if i fancy something different then i always enjoy going back to FL Studio.
Try the demos find out what YOU like about them.
fl studio is great for sequencing percussion imo. i like fl studio better, but it's what i'm accustomed to. i see ableton as more of a live dj mashup/edit tool than a production tool.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by davidbuhau i know this guy... whatever the sequencer du jour (sp?) is, he buys... he has registered copies of: FLStudio Ableton Live Nuendo Cubase (yes cubase and nuendo, what a retard) Reason Pro Tools just guess how proficient he is with all of them david |
Id go with Cubase over both ableton and FL studio because it is much better handling audio, much better mixer, and sequencing. If you wanna do the live mixing thingy with Ableton then go with that. If you're a student you can get a good discount.
was a 7 year fl studio user that just turned to ableton about a year and a half ago... have not looked back since 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by -=chato4ever=- ...FL studio because it is much better handling audio... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ray_Chappell Can you elaborate? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vortex_SA Read the whole sentence mate |
for production stuff, this is all personal preference stuff, but for live stuff ableton takes the cake...
once you learn the shortcuts, live becomes pretty fast at sequencing, also because of the ability to create in both the arrangement/session view (similar to the mixer view in crapbase), i'd say that live is actually more powerful in terms of sequencing and getting ideas recorded quickly.
FL Studio 8 is the latest edition of Fruity Loops, and it is by far the most streamlined and easy to use software studio I have laid my eyes on (and I've seen Reason 3, Cubase 3, MOTU Digital Performer 4, and Logic).
It may not be regarded as the most professional software studio out there, but ImageLine has been updating it relatively frequently and it has gained tremendous popularity because of its fantastic interface and its plug-in capabilities.
Cubase 4 (the new one) has a slightly upper hand on FL Studio 8 because it produced an overall slightly better sound, but to a large extent, the sound quality also depends on the skills and experience of the artist.
Ableton Live is more of a... live "spinning" application, similar to Virtual DJ 5, just WAY MORE advanced (I can't even compare the two). If you don't like using hardware turntables for DJing, Ableton Live is definitely the software to get. It can actually be used for production as well, but in my opinion, it gives way to the other more powerful software studios.
*Trance. Amplify your possibilities.*
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ray_Chappell What does that tell me? How does a better mixer and better "sequencing" (not sure what that means either) explain Cubase's superior handling of audio? |

(as does fruity don't get me wrong...)
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Starphaze Ableton Live is more of a... live "spinning" application, similar to Virtual DJ 5, just WAY MORE advanced (I can't even compare the two). If you don't like using hardware turntables for DJing, Ableton Live is definitely the software to get. It can actually be used for production as well, but in my opinion, it gives way to the other more powerful software studios. *Trance. Amplify your possibilities.* |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Vortex_SA I don't know ask him not me ![]() |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lucidity Ps- IMO Cubase SUX - not to offend anybody, |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Starphaze Ableton Live is more of a... live "spinning" application, similar to Virtual DJ 5, just WAY MORE advanced (I can't even compare the two). If you don't like using hardware turntables for DJing, Ableton Live is definitely the software to get. It can actually be used for production as well, but in my opinion, it gives way to the other more powerful software studios. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.