TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Aril Brikha accuses Shlomi Aber of plagiarism.
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »
Aril Brikha accuses Shlomi Aber of plagiarism.
| quote: | ||||||
| Aril Brikha has accused Israeli techno producer Shlomi Aber of plagiarism. The famed Detroit devotee was reportedly e-mailed by a fan, pointing out the similarity between Aber's recent b-side 'Efrat' and his own 'Groove La Chord'. After comparing the two, Brikha took the matter to the court of public opinion and posted a long message to his blog on MySpace. After elucidating how close the songs were, including a unique off-beat chord that appears in both, Brikha then got a bit nasty:
Ouch. This is the internet, so it was only a matter of time before Aber showed up to the party in the comments, defending himself thusly:
While we're still processing exactly what that means Brikha apparently ran it through Google Translator and was not impressed, responding:
As of press time, the threat of legal action has been hinted at, but RA could not confirm that any suits had been filed. |
Re: Aril Brikha accuses Shlomi Aber of plagiarism.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT Ouch. This is the internet, so it was only a matter of time before Aber showed up to the party in the comments, defending himself thusly: While we're still processing exactly what that means Brikha apparently ran it through Google Translator and was not impressed, responding: As of press time, the threat of legal action has been hinted at, but RA could not confirm that any suits had been filed. Groove La Chord Sample Efrat Sample First of all, does this not remind you of basically every argument on the internet that has ever taken place? And Second, I'm not sure how I feel about this - they are indeed quite close, but I'm not sure I buy the plagiarism tact, that is, unless Brikha wants to accuse FDV of basically stealing his sound as well. I don't know, maybe a few more listens to the two and I'll feel different, but what do you all think? |
Nothing new, listen to "Looking in God Eye's" (first track of Shlomi's album). It's an obvious sample of Trentemoller's Moan.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PETRAN Does second sample lead to a "headphones.gif"? |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by d-miurge Nothing new, listen to "Looking in God Eye's" (first track of Shlomi's album). It's an obvious sample of Trentemoller's Moan. |
Regardless of whether or not it is plagiarism, is he that devoid of ideas? Never liked his music much anyway.
Whats upsetting to me is less the actual copying itself than the fact that people are so out of creative juice that they recycle stuff to such a point.
I guess, but what happens when someone comes up with an example of similarly close tunes that Brikha supposedly "plagiarized"? Will you all of a sudden not care much for his music either?
To be honest, I can't remember the last time I heard a track I thought was truly "original" in the world of dance music. That doesn't mean I haven't heard loads of good music over the years, but originality in general seems to be absent from much of EDM.
liked 2 songs...moved on.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT I guess, but what happens when someone comes up with an example of similarly close tunes that Brikha supposedly "plagiarized"? Will you all of a sudden not care much for his music either? To be honest, I can't remember the last time I heard a track I thought was truly "original" in the world of dance music. That doesn't mean I haven't heard loads of good music over the years, but originality in general seems to be absent from much of EDM. |
LOL, I can see it already - this thread is about to become a "Shlomi Aber was always shit anyway" thread rather than the topic actually posed.
I haven't been a particularly huge fan either, but do think this whole little situation raises the more important point of whether or not there is, and to what degree, originality exists in the world of EDM.
Groove la chord is such a nice track.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis Sure, but the guy basically admitted "I use presets, so does everyone else" and I think we should be striving not to. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT LOL, I can see it already - this thread is about to become a "Shlomi Aber was always shit anyway" thread rather than the topic actually posed. I haven't been a particularly huge fan either, but do think this whole little situation raises the more important point of whether or not there is, and to what degree, originality exists in the world of EDM. |
well he certainly is no Aril Brikha
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT Is it OK for you then when people do it but don't admit that they do? I'd wager it happens more often than not. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT Yeah, I don't know much about Aber beyond having a handful of his tunes - but this comparison did remind me of countless other comparisons from the "tracks that sound like other tracks" thread, which made me wonder whether or not this was legitimately plagiarism, or just what is, and always will be the case in electronic music. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by elFreak well he certainly is no Aril Brikha |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis I'm sure it does, and I probably do play some those tracks. But I just try to find music in general from people I think are trying interesting things. The thing is to, maybe certain tracks reuse elements, but when you're talking about a main melody or bassline, something that is really the nest of the track, it makes a big difference imo. This relates to a funny story by a buddy of mine telling me about asking Troy Pierce how he made some part of one of his track, and Pierce basically saying "I can't tell you, it's a secret". My friend then went home that weekend, opened up his production software, found the preset, and basically remade the track, and then played it in front of Troy at house party. |
I guess if you suck as much as Shlomi Aber, people aren't gonna have as much sympathy for you recycling something thats been done before.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis I guess if you suck as much as Shlomi Aber, people aren't gonna have as much sympathy for you recycling something thats been done before. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis I guess if you suck as much as Shlomi Aber, people aren't gonna have as much sympathy for you recycling something thats been done before. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by RJT To be honest, I can't remember the last time I heard a track I thought was truly "original" in the world of dance music. That doesn't mean I haven't heard loads of good music over the years, but originality in general seems to be absent from much of EDM. |
lol.
really not that similar imo. and there are far worse examples.
I also would like to point out there is very little originality in most music not just edm.
I also think this kind of "he said, she said" bickering is only really going to serve to make both parties look bad, but perhaps worse for Brikha than Aber.
There's a reason people respect those who take the high road, and unfortunately if it does in fact come down to most people saying "Well, that's great - but it's really no different, or worse, than countless other examples", then what was the point in opening your mouth in the first place?
It isn't as if he's going to win an international intellectual property battle and be paid boatloads of money - hell, I don't think there's any way Brikha could manage to stop Efrat from being distributed.
I don't know - I love Aril Brikha, and just wish in general he'd taken the high road rather than putting this out there for people like us to sit and dissect.
No one was ever going to say "Hey, you know that Shlomi Aber - 'Efrat' track? Yeah, that's a WAY better version of a crappy old Aril Brikha tune." 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles True. IMO most pop music (and I include almost all dance music under the broad heading of "pop") is less about originality than about using whatever "works," which means looking for the quickest and simplest route to get people dancing or feeling the intended emotions (e.g. in "uplifting" trance). And if that means re-using a certain rhythm from yesterday's hit, a bassline, part or whole of a melody, or even just lifting out an entire chunk from someone else's track and using it in your own, then so be it. This music is made for having fun, as part of the array of ephemeral pleasures experienced in a night out -- not for being exhaustively analyzed on a formal level, assessed with regard to relations to predecessors, or set up alongside venerated composers in the history books. So it makes sense that a lot of its producers would have few worries about whether they're being all that original -- that's just not their goal in many cases, or at least not their main one. |
I think that in most cases when dance music producers think they're doing something very original, they're either not particularly well-informed (not knowing much about the history of dance music or music generally) or they're splitting hairs (carving out a domain of "originality" by doing something just mildly different).
Anyway, I think there's something to be said for the notion that originality shouldn't be the main yard stick by which to judge music-makers.
A few people think that an overemphasis on originality is what led the classical tradition to produce what most people think of as unlistenable crap in the form of modernist atonal music:
http://www.classicalarchives.com/ar...edwards036.html
http://www.classicalarchives.com/ar...edwards037.html
http://www.classicalarchives.com/ar...edwards040.html
Interesting reads, if you have the time and an interest in music history.
On the other hand, I too get frustrated at the number of idiots out there who are outright plagiarizing other people's work.
Speaking of plagiarism, check your facebook inbox Rob! 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.