TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Will there be world peace if everyone gets to have sex?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Rigon on Jan-11-2009 21:57:

Will there be world peace if everyone gets to have sex?

With whoever we wanted and as many times as we wanted.

Or would we just get god damn tired of fucking eachother, and start dreaming of the times where everything was about war again...


Posted by Rose on Jan-11-2009 22:36:

STD's will spread like wildfires.


Posted by DJ_Eternal on Jan-11-2009 22:42:

The world will become over-populated, food will run short, people will eat other people, rather than eat-out other people, just to survive. A very rosy future indeed.

The future's bright, the future's Orange.


Posted by nrjizer on Jan-11-2009 23:17:

They already tried this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Society


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jan-11-2009 23:47:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Eternal
The world will become over-populated, food will run short, people will eat other people, rather than eat-out other people, just to survive. A very rosy future indeed.

The future's bright, the future's Orange.


The future's green.

Soylent green!


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-13-2009 16:14:

Re: Will there be world peace if everyone gets to have sex?

quote:
Originally posted by Rigon
With whoever we wanted and as many times as we wanted.

Or would we just get god damn tired of fucking eachother, and start dreaming of the times where everything was about war again...


I would bank on the latter.

The same passion which incites violence is merely an extension of sexual potential. To say that war, on the whole, is caused by sexual tension between organisms is a bit of an over-simplification, but it's not necessarily untrue. But war is more an extension of society than it is an extension of violence - sort a paradox, I know.

Sex however is a carnal instinct amplified by society, much like violence; but its passion lies in its competition, it's taboo as a public faculty; it is something that everybody wants, but not everybody can have at all times - this dynamic may very well lead people to violence, but it is the very same work that defines the reward, in a sense. Sex would probably be pretty boring if you never had to earn it.

In Huxley's Brave New World, sex was a social component encouraged by authority as a means to in fact dispassion people - a stark dystopian contrast to Orwell's 1984, where sexual contact was thoroughly disapproved by authorities. I thought this was a far more interesting concept, as characters in the book were known to have numerous and multiple partners, over-sexed to the point where it was merely a social function rather than a leisurely pursuit one had to compete with others for - in short, people were bled of their passion and as such, could no longer enjoy the things that we find enhanced by said spirit.

It is the taboo and the relative criminality that defines our virility for perpetuating our discontinual existence - not as often, the act, itself.


Posted by boris_the_bear on Jan-13-2009 16:38:

quote:
Originally posted by nrjizer
They already tried this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Society


quote:
Even though the community reached a maximum population of about 300, it had a complex bureaucracy of 27 standing committees and 48 administrative sections.


idiots


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Jan-13-2009 16:39:

World Peace is something we shouldn't even stride for....it would be the destruction of the human race. If anything....we need more one night stands with emotionally unstable women....this could cause global chaos which would lead to massive killings across the world and saving the human race.


Posted by elFreak on Jan-13-2009 16:48:

what good is sex if you can't hate.


Posted by Vivid Boy on Jan-13-2009 16:51:

when i have sex i mark territory so if i ever saw anyone sniffin up the wrong tree baby ill fuckin kill u. so no world peac in the end


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-13-2009 17:22:

Oh Vivid, where don't you urinate?

*campy chuckle*


Posted by Psy-T on Jan-13-2009 17:30:

Re: Re: Will there be world peace if everyone gets to have sex?

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
In Huxley's Brave New World, sex was a social component encouraged by authority as a means to in fact dispassion people - a stark dystopian contrast to Orwell's 1984


same in Yevgeny Zamyatin's We, if i remember correctly.


Posted by elFreak on Jan-13-2009 18:07:

double plus good.


Posted by Ania_xox on Jan-13-2009 18:19:

Sex adds joy to life.

But first, you have to have a life that consists of more than a dream of finally having sex.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-13-2009 18:25:

KarateKid

Wise words, ania_xox, wise words.


Posted by elFreak on Jan-13-2009 18:37:

i can't wait until a girl is stupid enough to let me finger her bush...man i'm so gonna make the guys i play warcraft with smell my e fingers.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jan-13-2009 18:56:

Love would be meaningless if we couldn't contrast it with hate.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-13-2009 19:59:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Love would be meaningless if we couldn't contrast it with hate.


I don't know... love's pretty good even if you only contrast it with indifference. Besides, world peace does not mean an absence of hatred, just an absence of starting wars over it (or anything). Pacifists can hate... I'm sure those hippies I called pussies, punched, and then laughed at hated me... they were just too big of hippie pussies to do anything about it.


Posted by Lira on Jan-13-2009 20:02:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Love would be meaningless if we couldn't contrast it with hate.

I disagree. If you really think meaning arises from differences (how structuralist of you!), you ought to contrast love with indiference, not hate.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-13-2009 20:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I disagree. If you really think meaning arises from differences (how structuralist of you!), you ought to contrast love with indiference, not hate.


kinda late to the party on that one, aren't you?


*basks in the glory of being slightly quicker then one of the smartest persons on the boards*


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-13-2009 20:10:

Love and hate are really nebulous concepts - there is only reproductive functions and the culture we have assigned to facilitate them and then there is the aggressive defense of territory, ideals and the same reproductive faculties we would so readily assign "love" to.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-13-2009 20:11:

Hey, I think you guys would do better to contrast love with indifference, not hatred. Just sayin'.


Posted by elFreak on Jan-13-2009 20:12:

you can only love someone you are fucking?

ok there.


Posted by Lira on Jan-13-2009 20:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
kinda late to the party on that one, aren't you?


*basks in the glory of being slightly quicker then one of the smartest persons on the boards*



*shakes fist*

Bleh... I was just 3 minutes late! Regardless of that, your post is certainly a lot more elaborate then mine


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-13-2009 20:16:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
you can only love someone you are fucking?

ok there.


Who are you talking to?

USE YOUR WORDS. FUCK.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.