TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- New Toronto billboard bylaw will bring down hundreds and tax whats left!
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
New Toronto billboard bylaw will bring down hundreds and tax whats left!
| quote: |
| A proposed sign tax that would add millions to city coffers could also mean hundreds of billboards across Toronto would be pulled down. "Alarming" was the word used by Rosanne Caron, president of the Out of Home Marketing Association of Canada, which represents nine sign firms, five of them affected by the new measures. A new bylaw being considered would establish uniform rules across the city for legal, permanent signs and a new billboard tax that would raise $10.4 million. "The new tax has the potential to put some companies out of business ... and reduce opportunities for public service advertising," Caron said. But Rami Tabello of Illegalsigns.ca, a watchdog group, says it will also clean up the city's skyline by eliminating illegally placed signs. |
1) yet another city tax grab
2) id rather see billboards than plain brick walls or walls full of graffitti
3) i cant believe there is actually a group formed against this. Do people in this city really have nothing better to do?
4) can this city become any more anti business?
1) probably or someone's goodie goodie idea to 'clean up'.
2) I'd actually rather see brick walls and graffiti.
3) no, they probably don't
4) I'm sure it could, but it's fucking over homeowners pretty good already with municipal land transfer tax, higher water bills, and the province's HST is going to hurt us even more.
Hmmmm...I'd like to see the full article and more information, that link doesn't work...Could you provide another, Jay?
that was the full article.
If youd rather see brick walls and graffiti i cannot fathom why. A lot of ads are colourful and add to an otherwise bleak city. Its not like we are rome or paris or anywhere with significant character. Billboards, murals and signs should be encouraged along with better archetecture and design.
The city is F ing everyone over but especially business which is why its fleeing to city in droves.
More bylaws = more cost = less competativeness = lost business = fewer jobs. Rinse... repeat
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 that was the full article. If youd rather see brick walls and graffiti i cannot fathom why. A lot of ads are colourful and add to an otherwise bleak city. Its not like we are rome or paris or anywhere with significant character. Billboards, murals and signs should be encouraged along with better archetecture and design. The city is F ing everyone over but especially business which is why its fleeing to city in droves. More bylaws = more cost = less competativeness = lost business = fewer jobs. Rinse... repeat |
This new bylaw will ban most billboards and all video billboards except at yonge and dundas. The ones already in place will be taxed $24000 per year which basically means they will be taxed out of existence.
Just when you think toronto cant get any more pathetic.....
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 This new bylaw will ban most billboards and all video billboards except at yonge and dundas. The ones already in place will be taxed $24000 per year which basically means they will be taxed out of existence. Just when you think toronto cant get any more pathetic..... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MikeyN 24K ??? Are you kidding me? That's fucking ridiculous! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 apparently its the first and only tax of this kind in the world.... i guess u cant say toronto isnt innovative! Whats next? taxing seniors to use parks or taxing sidewalks? Oh wait... never mind! |
As someone who works in the media industry I think this is a good idea; it has been a long time coming for outdoor media.
Outdoor ads have gone crazy in this city, many of them are unlicensed, too large based on the licence they have and generally not that good of quality (nor maintained to keep them looking good).
The billboard conglomerates (Pattison, Viacom/CBS, Lamar) are typically pretty good with their sites, but the problem is the rogue installations that actually clutter up the city and devalue the whole industry.
Check out this site for some good analysis on the issues: http://www.IllegalSigns.ca
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rabbitjoker As someone who works in the media industry I think this is a good idea; it has been a long time coming for outdoor media. Outdoor ads have gone crazy in this city, many of them are unlicensed, too large based on the licence they have and generally not that good of quality (nor maintained to keep them looking good). The billboard conglomerates (Pattison, Viacom/CBS, Lamar) are typically pretty good with their sites, but the problem is the rogue installations that actually clutter up the city and devalue the whole industry. Check out this site for some good analysis on the issues: http://www.IllegalSigns.ca |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by -g- indeed, many of the existing billboards flaunt existing bylaws as it is, and to be honest, i really don't want to see yet another car ad or yet another big mac ad. i'll take my skyline, architecture, and local artistry over corporate slogans any day. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rabbitjoker As someone who works in the media industry I think this is a good idea; it has been a long time coming for outdoor media. Outdoor ads have gone crazy in this city, many of them are unlicensed, too large based on the licence they have and generally not that good of quality (nor maintained to keep them looking good). The billboard conglomerates (Pattison, Viacom/CBS, Lamar) are typically pretty good with their sites, but the problem is the rogue installations that actually clutter up the city and devalue the whole industry. Check out this site for some good analysis on the issues: http://www.IllegalSigns.ca |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by -g- indeed, many of the existing billboards flaunt existing bylaws as it is, and to be honest, i really don't want to see yet another car ad or yet another big mac ad. i'll take my skyline, architecture, and local artistry over corporate slogans any day. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LightsOut +1 completely agreed, and i think $24000/yr is a fair tax for advertising realty at yonge and dundas... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 Seeing a big mac ad... is it really that big of a deal? Really? I mean some of the ads out there are boring and ugly but a lot of them actually ad colour to the landscape. And "unregulated" ads actually encourage creativity in some ways because those painted murals that are actually advertisements can be pretty cool. I dont understand how people can keep supporting taxes and control over every little facet of life. |
edit there...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by -g- i support the law and a reasonable enjoyment of the space in which i live. if for you that constitutes being ok with flagrant violation of city laws in the name of commerce, and you enjoy corporate splash art over original artistic expression or the beauty of the buildings that abound in our city, i can't help you. |
| quote: |
| the fact is, billboards are often erected in what would otherwise be free and public space. i enjoy unique architecture, art, and hell, yes, even an unmolested skyline. to impose on those things SHOULD cost corporations big money. that's what governance is all about after all - managing public assets and overseeing the welfare of its citizens through representation in commercial life an otherwise. |
| quote: |
| there is nothing unique or interesting about billboard advertisements - if i wanted those, i'd watch tv all day or rip adds out of magazines and plaster my own walls with them. these things add nothing of any value to my life and while i don't like them, i accept them in return for funding government programs through remuneration. |
| quote: |
| its what people call a fair trade. and its something this organization you originally quoted to start this thread actually agreed to prior to its pandering press release. typical pr and i'm surprised anyone would expect to hear anything different or feel somehow aggrieved on their behalf. |
wait till they introduce the "Play Music" tax/noise pollution fine...if you want to play music you have to pay for it.....that will go over well.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ChemEnhanced wait till they introduce the "Play Music" tax/noice pollution fine...if you want to play music you have to pay for it.....that will go over well. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 based on what? have you looked at the numbers and the income statement for running a billboard? If anything its a rip off. Property taxes on 2000 square feet average about $5000. How big is a billboard? 200 square feet? For $24000? Nothing but a cash grab. I hope when they introduce a new tax that YOU have to pay you will have the same nonchalant reaction |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LightsOut of course it a cash grab, and the city needs money right now. The reason i don't mind this type of bylaw is because it goes after these large corporations, who can afford to pay $24000 a year for prime advertising space, and not the average toronto resident. |
| quote: |
| If a new tax is implemented for Toronto residents, I may or may not support it, the city needs adequate funding to prosper and the current model does not seem to be working, so I'm fully open to them exploring new alternatives, which may very well be through taxes. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ChemEnhanced wait till they introduce the "Play Music" tax/noise pollution fine...if you want to play music you have to pay for it.....that will go over well. |
there is so much unsubstantiated throw-away opinion in this thread i think its best to just walk away and realize that the change is good, and it is coming, whether the sky-is-falling naysayers like it or not.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.