TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- FAO: Ron Paul Supporters
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

FAO: Ron Paul Supporters

Where is your messiah now you fucking FREAKS.

quote:

The congressman from Texas and Republican candidate unveiled a budget plan yesterday to reduce the deficit that would eliminate five federal departments: Energy, Commerce, Interior, Education, and Housing and Urban Development. In one fell swoop, such a step would erase, among other programs, the Energy Department's $5-billion Office of Science, the $4.5-billion National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the $750-million National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the $1.1-billion U.S. Geological Survey.

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencei...-in.html?ref=hp

who here supports Ron Paul?

I guess it should have been FAO: prolikewhoa

I take comfort in the fact that this whack job will never, ever be elected president.

Also, nice banner ad for Ron Paul donations at the top of this thread.

Lol, I saw that ad, too.

Sounds good.

I just got two of these.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker I just bought a pair of these today.

Ron Paul supporters?

As an outsider it would be interesting seeing Ron Paul elected president. It would be like watching the last days of Rome fast forwarded to fit into a single generation...as an outsider.


If i was actually to live under the lunatic i would be scared to death of him being elected. About the only thing the dems and republicans can agree on is that the guy is fucking insane and should in no way come close to being anything more than a congressman.


As for his supporters, shame we ran the17sss off, though he would probably be disappointed that rp still didnt cut enough government programmes.

It is not like those departments do anything right anyways. He should go even further. No more administration at all. The US should become the wild west again. Anything goes.

Afghanistan West.

People are tired of Bureaucracy, what do you expect

quote:

Originally posted by LiquidX People are tired of Bureaucracy, what do you expect

That they rationally look at it instead of saying "WELL THERE ARE PROBLEMS SO GET RID OF IT"

Nope. Americans (and a lot of people in the world) are too stupid to look at complex issues and work out all the parts and would rather just take the black or the white answer to the question.

Fucking retards. This is why people do not deserve a voice most of the time. They are too stupid for their own good.

I can't help but laugh at how butthurt all the clueless leftist twats on TA are about everything conservative.

quote:

Originally posted by Meat187 I can't help but laugh at how butthurt all the clueless leftist twats on TA are about everything conservative.

Huh?

eliminating the noaa? does he just want to kneecap all natural disaster preparedness?

He is the only person who seems to be in favor of getting rid of wasteful spending; which is what all of those departments are, a complete waste of money and resources. Good for him; glad someone has the balls to tell the truth.

quote:

Originally posted by DOOMBOT He is the only person who seems to be in favor of getting rid of wasteful spending;

Only?

quote:

Originally posted by DOOMBOT He is the only person who seems to be in favor of getting rid of wasteful spending; which is what all of those departments are, a complete waste of money and resources. Good for him; glad someone has the balls to tell the truth.

i too think science is vastly overrated.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker Only?

Did I miss another presidential candidate that is against wasteful spending by the public sector?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN i too think science is vastly overrated.

ok

quote:

Originally posted by DOOMBOT Did I miss another presidential candidate that is against wasteful spending by the public sector?

How about you start counting all the ones who actually* made wasteful spending part or whole of a campaign promise, first, and then get back to me so we can discuss your options for not having to use so many false-choice arguments.









*Important: Must actually be a part of a campaign platform and not a strawman inference based on either an interpretation or a belief that said platform would promote wasteful spending as a result of its implementation.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker How about you start counting all the ones who actually* made wasteful spending part or whole of a campaign promise, first, and then get back to me so we can discuss your options for not having to use so many false-choice arguments. *Important: Must actually be a part of a campaign platform and not a strawman inference based on either an interpretation or a belief that said platform would promote wasteful spending as a result of its implementation.

Sorry, I don't believe I saw a single name in your response. Which candidate, other then Ron Paul, shares ways in which wasteful government spending would be reduced or completely eliminated again?

quote:

Originally posted by DOOMBOT Sorry, I don't believe I saw a single name in your response. Which candidate, other then Ron Paul, shares ways in which wasteful government spending would be reduced or completely eliminated again?

And I'm sorry, but I don't believe you've made a single rational argument and have yet to abandon your consistent use of logical fallacy.








It appears we are at an impasse.

quote:

Originally posted by DOOMBOT Sorry, I don't believe I saw a single name in your response. Which candidate, other then Ron Paul, shares ways in which wasteful government spending would be reduced or completely eliminated again?

Sorry, I don't believe I saw all your chromosomes... Were you born retarded?

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.