TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- iTunes compressed AAC sounds like a$$...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-08-2012 23:57:

Thumbs down iTunes compressed AAC sounds like a$$...

Hello everyone!

I recently signed up here to tranceaddict.com because I am a lover of electronic music. I am curious to see who else agrees with me that listening to music in uncompressed audio formats such as WAV and AIFF REALLY makes a difference when it comes to sound quality, regardless of the song you are listening to. I've been using iTunes for almost 5 years, and it's only been since recently that I've discovered how much money I've wasted (well, not entirely "wasted") on the crappy AAC music the iTunes store has to offer. Beatport and Discogs are far more efficient music stores. I am just a bit peeved, because some of the music I want isn't available in uncompressed formats. I'm assuming that because iTunes is so mainstream, most people don't care about sound quality, seeing as iTunes can fool you into thinking their music doesn't suck with their HQ store previews (God help those who get their music with the YouTube converter).

I'm sure everyone already knows this, but it's a real bummer when you finally figure out that you've been sorta ripped off for a long time.


Posted by movingincircles on Jan-09-2012 00:06:

Re: iTunes compressed AAC sounds like a$$...

quote:
Originally posted by kirbydoo
Hello everyone!

I recently signed up here to tranceaddict.com because I am a lover of electronic music. I am curious to see who else agrees with me that listening to music in uncompressed audio formats such as WAV and AIFF REALLY makes a difference when it comes to sound quality, regardless of the song you are listening to. I've been using iTunes for almost 5 years, and it's only been since recently that I've discovered how much money I've wasted (well, not entirely "wasted") on the crappy AAC music the iTunes store has to offer. Beatport and Discogs are far more efficient music stores. I am just a bit peeved, because some of the music I want isn't available in uncompressed formats. I'm assuming that because iTunes is so mainstream, most people don't care about sound quality, seeing as iTunes can fool you into thinking their music doesn't suck with their HQ store previews (God help those who get their music with the YouTube converter).

I'm sure everyone already knows this, but it's a real bummer when you finally figure out that you've been sorta ripped off for a long time.


I have WAV + AAC on several albums, I can't hear the difference. I listen to them with http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_...iophileQ40.html and http://www.logitech.com/en-us/ue/ue...ces/TripleFi-10 (whether they're good or not, I don't know).


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-09-2012 00:35:

Re: Re: iTunes compressed AAC sounds like a$$...

quote:
Originally posted by movingincircles
I have WAV + AAC on several albums, I can't hear the difference. I listen to them with http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_...iophileQ40.html and http://www.logitech.com/en-us/ue/ue...ces/TripleFi-10 (whether they're good or not, I don't know).


Hmm... I suppose everyone's ears are different. I use Bose headphones, despite the current trend with Beats by Dr. Dre, which IMO, are awful.


Posted by meriter on Jan-09-2012 01:06:

shit man I bought 2 albums off the iTunes store back in 2005, and those were copy protected .m4a files that you needed to log in to listen to. Can't even copy them to another drive. Total waste of time and money.


Posted by movingincircles on Jan-09-2012 10:12:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
shit man I bought 2 albums off the iTunes store back in 2005, and those were copy protected .m4a files that you needed to log in to listen to. Can't even copy them to another drive. Total waste of time and money.


2005? an app called "jhymn" strips the protection off of "older" iTunes music.


Posted by movingincircles on Jan-09-2012 10:12:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
shit man I bought 2 albums off the iTunes store back in 2005, and those were copy protected .m4a files that you needed to log in to listen to. Can't even copy them to another drive. Total waste of time and money.


2005? an app called "jhymn" strips the protection off of "older" iTunes music.


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-10-2012 00:02:

Meriter, I'm sure that sucked for you. I hate DRM with a passion.

Also, to Eurofix, I'm sure it does. I remember when I was younger, my household used to play CDs, and I always wondered why it sounded better than when I'd use my iHome (which I retired long ago).

It's kind of obvious why that is, now.


Posted by Adam420 on Jan-10-2012 00:07:

What kind of music do you listen to?


Posted by Salegon on Jan-10-2012 02:00:

I tunes is totally shit. Apple products are mostly overrated commercial hype.


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-10-2012 03:08:

Adam420, I'm picky. I listen to all different kinds of music, but I'm mainly into electro house, indie dance/nu disco, and trance, of course. I think that electronic music is the most advanced form of music.

Salegon, I agree with you. I just use iTunes so I have a place to store my music on my computer. I'm sorta moving on from it now.


Posted by butlerana on Jan-10-2012 03:45:

Apple products are mostly overrated commercial hype.


Posted by Adam420 on Jan-10-2012 05:20:

quote:
Originally posted by kirbydoo
I think that electronic music is the most advanced form of music.


It really depends how you look at it


Posted by enydo on Jan-10-2012 05:21:

quote:
Originally posted by kirbydoo
I think that electronic music is the most advanced form of music.


CERTAINLY


Posted by Chimney on Jan-10-2012 18:17:

lolitunes. AAC is shit. Real men listen to FLAC.


Posted by Woony on Jan-10-2012 19:31:

I don't like AAC but as far as I'm concerned, the 256 AAC they sell is the same quality as 320 mp3s?


Posted by meriter on Jan-10-2012 19:33:

proprietary media formats are a crime against humanity


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-11-2012 01:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Chimney
lolitunes. AAC is shit. Real men listen to FLAC.


My point exactly.


Posted by Lews on Jan-12-2012 00:36:

Got to be trolling.

Or 12.


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-12-2012 02:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Lews
Got to be trolling.

Or 12.


Are you referring to the person who claimed that "real men listen to FLAC"? I would hope so, seeing as I am just making a point in this forum.


Posted by meriter on Jan-12-2012 02:58:

this fucking thread is awful


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-12-2012 03:25:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
this fucking thread is awful


This made me laugh.


Posted by meriter on Jan-12-2012 03:26:

im automatically subscribing to threads now so everytime someone posts something I get an email and god this one has just been a depressing few days. Nothing interesting happened.


Posted by LAdazeNYnights on Jan-12-2012 05:39:

You live in Boston?
Are you asian?
How old are you?


Personally, I think 56kbps is the way to go. I rip all my music off of youtube in the 56kbps format.


Posted by kirbydoo on Jan-12-2012 14:06:

Judging on the nature of some of the threads on this website, I was just waiting for someone to come in and say something irrelevant like "Are you Asian?".

I suppose this thread is done. Thanks for your opinions people!


Posted by Chimney on Jan-12-2012 16:46:

quote:
Originally posted by kirbydoo
Are you referring to the person who claimed that "real men listen to FLAC"? I would hope so, seeing as I am just making a point in this forum.


New and cocky, eh?


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.