TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?
Pages (162): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »

| quote: |
| Originally posted by {b.s.e.} heh, yet you failed to mention it even once while bickering over semantics. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by {b.s.e.} It's an interesting factor added to the equation, granted. It doesn't account for the blatant demolition drop of WTC7. The tankers exploded, but they cannot attribute the collapse to merely fuel. Watch the video from the link I provided. That bitch burned, but her guts were busted open before she collapsed. It is as simple as that. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by {b.s.e.} it's a shame i had to be the one to answer you and I'm sure you won't be phased. Seig heil, bud. you'll never understand. I'm o.k. with that. You know? It's pretty unnerving to think that people are actually this dumb and mislead. At least you know Goehring is getting a laugh. |
This thread is still going? If i piled all the worthless crap that culrout has copied and pasted from the intarweb, i could fertilize saskatchewan.
seriously just give it up, no one has offered any NEW AND COMPELLING evidence and the truthers have yet to produce a credible anti thesis for the FEMA report.
So until the ASCE journal publishes one of Jones' half brained theories, i say case closed.
| quote: |
| [b]Originally posted by colonelcrisp |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut Yes 190 60.70% No 123 39.30% Talk is cheap, the numbers speak for themselves. |
Also remember, this is tranceaddict. A decent percentage (about 60% i would say) of people are probably on drugs, and you know how paranoid those can make you. You believe any nonsense when you are on drugs, especially this kind of nonsense.
hahahha. i honestly cant believe that he keeps trotting out the TA poll as if it actually means something. it really does boggle my mind. of course he never studied quantitative research methods like some of us 
finally, the truth movement is dying. many of their sites are begging for 'survival' money, their joke of a 'journal' has stopped accepting new material, there is no second investigation, not a single 'government agent' has been charged with anything related to those false flags, they can't get anybody to their daft rallies, and nobody that actually matters is listening to them.
the creator of the architects & engineers truther site (richard gage) was forced to remove the 'american institute of architects' (i think thats its name) symbol and branding from his website. haha, he names his site after architects and not a single respected organisation wants to be associated with him
steven jones got an opinionated letter 'published' in an online vanity journal, for which he paid at least $600US for
which wasn't even peer reviewed, and even then it said absolutely nothing of merit or scientific validity.
for every idiotic celebrity they claim to have, there are entire professions that show them utter disrespect.
of course there will be people wasting their time with it like poor old cretinrot here, but i think you'll find many truthers have given up on the whole 'movement' ha and are focusing on more important things.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? Yes 190 60.70% No 123 39.30% Talk is cheap, the numbers speak for themselves. In fact you and PKC sound more and more pathetic as you continue to undermine the subject with personal attacks. If you actually had a serious argument going on then maybe what you feel to be the truth about 9/11 would just maybe stand a chance. Sorry for shitting on you but you guys completely deserve it. Well I am not really sorry but fuk it. Picture removed: That pic was completely uncalled for. If you want to keep playing, focus on arguments, not on nasty mockery. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton LOL, I wouldn't use a poll on a trance music website to support your argument...Just a little advice... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton LOL, I wouldn't use a poll on a trance music website to support your argument...Just a little advice... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Moongoose Also remember, this is tranceaddict. A decent percentage (about 60% i would say) of people are probably on drugs, and you know how paranoid those can make you. You believe any nonsense when you are on drugs, especially this kind of nonsense. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SuspicionVandit There is still an embarrassing percentage of people in the civilized world that have an incorrect view of the planetary orbits (the sun revolving around the Earth) which I've always assumed is learned alongside multiplication and division in grade school. It's a bit offensive, yes. Now, as for the general public being educated in structural engineering, well, that's asking a bit much to rely on a public forum poll. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut Guess what they still lost and are still bitchy whiny losers. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN so, what exactly has the truth movement "won" in your time championing the cause? since we're losers you must be the winners, so what has been achieved champ? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut Well show me a poll that shows otherwise, every last one I have seen has not sided with the official story what so ever. |
| quote: |
| "Federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them". * 59% "not likely" * 20% "somewhat likely" * 16% "very likely" "The collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings". * 77% "unlikely" * 10% "somewhat likely" * 6% "very likely" "The Pentagon was struck by a military cruise missile in 2001 rather than by an airliner captured by terrorists". * 80% "not likely" * 6% "somewhat likely" * 6% "very likely" How about that some people in the federal government had specific warnings of the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, but chose to ignore those warnings. Is this very likely, somewhat likely or unlikely? * 32% "Very Likely" * 30% "Somewhat Likely * 30% "Unlikely" * 8% "Don't Know/Other" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut You see this post like practically all of the others you have made sums you up quite nicely. There is nothing to win, especially in a discussion forum which mainly is focused primarily on music. You decided to engage in a topic posted and began trashing people specifically not a "truth movement", including whether or not they were present on this forum. You have not backed up anything aside from posting what most who have read up on 9/11 already know. Muttering insults into cyberspace does not make you an expert on the matter either. If you feel it does get your head checked immediately, insults, rumors and mis-information posted from shady websites are not facts. If anything has been achieved it is that ignorance has been shown here to it's full potential and it continues to be the downfall of the human race. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN in other words, not a damned thing. 7 years of "researching" and the movement has got nothing to show for it. how humiliating |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN in other words, not a damned thing. 7 years of "researching" and the movement has got nothing to show for it. how humiliating |
Nothing accomplished?
NTSB: No Records Pertaining To Process Of Positive Identification Of 9/11 Aircraft Wreckage
Within a July 18, 2008 Freedom of Information Act response from the National Transportation Safety Board, the NTSB indicates that it possesses no records indicating how wreckage recovered from the 4 aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 was positively identified as belonging to the 4 planes reportedly hijacked that day or even if such wreckage was positively identified at all.
Within a similar March 18, 2008 FOIA response from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the FBI states the following:
"The identity of the three hijacked aircraft has never been in question by the FBI, NTSB or FAA"
http://www.infowars.com/?p=886&cp=1
However, NTSB factual reports pertaining to the Flight Data Recorders allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA) and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA), do not cite a "Flight Data Recorder Group", that would normally consist of Federal Aviation Administration and airline officials, in possession of records pertaining to a given aircraft and unique serial numbers pertaining to each FDR. The absence of published FDR part and serial numbers within each NTSB FDR report suggests that the NTSB were not provided access to such records that would allow them to confirm the identities of the FDRs studied by them.
Many FDRs possess unique memory configurations that are identified by serial numbers contained within a given aircraft's records. Such serial numbers are required to facilitate FDR data readouts. Presumably, if the recovered AA 77 and UA 93 FDR's did not possess the memory configurations indicated within FAA and airline aircraft records, a mismatch could become apparent to NTSB investigators.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16089
The FDRs in question were apparently recovered by NTSB personnel.
Carol Carmody, Vice-Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, referring to the NTSB:
"I ... assured FBI Director Mueller that we would assist in any way we could ... he called and said, "Could you send us some people to help find the black boxes and help identify aircraft parts."
http://www.ntsb.gov/speeches/carmody/cc020227.htm
Marion Blakey, Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, referring to the NTSB:
"Over 60 Safety Board employees worked around the clock in Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, and at our headquarters in Washington, D. C., assisting with aircraft parts identification"
http://www.ntsb.gov/Speeches/blakey/mcb020625.htm
The text of the July 11, 2008 NTSB FOIA request:
"I respectfully request copies of records revealing the process by which wreckage recovered from the aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified as belonging to: American Airlines flight 11 (N334AA), United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA), American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA) and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA).
The afore mentioned aircraft are identified within numerous public NTSB records. Positive wreckage identification was presumably obtained through the use of unique serial number identifying information contained by the said aircraft's wreckage. Within U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 14, Part 45, it is indicated that all U.S. commercial civil aircraft are required to contain numerous components bearing unique serial number data "secured in such a manner that it will not likely be ... lost or destroyed in an accident"."
Nothing accomplished?
National Security Whistleblower J. Michael Springmann
This week Visibility 9-11 welcomes former diplomat from the State Department's Foreign Service J. Michael Springmann. Mr. Springmann served postings in Germany, India, Saudi Arabia, and the Bureau of Intelligence and Research in Washington D.C. He is a published author of several articles on national security themes, and is an attorney in private practice in Washington D.C.
Michael has attended several 9/11 Conferences over the years, most notably, the 9/11 Omission hearings on 9/9/2004 chaired by former Representative and current Green Party candidate for President, Cynthia McKinney, as well as the recent conference in Keene, NH.
Included in this important interview is a discussion regarding a new article by Mr. Springmann titled, THE MISTAKE DEPARTMENT: One Example of Why American Foreign Policy is a Disaster that discusses the American Consulate General at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and it's relationship to 15 of the 19 alleged September 11th hijackers. In it, he says that "the Jeddah Consulate was not a State Department post but an intelligence services operation", "the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) routinely demanded (and got) visas for sleazy characters with no ties to either their home country or Saudi Arabia," and "these vile people were terrorists recruited by U.S. intelligence officers along with Osama bin Laden, then a CIA asset."
wow. i take it all back. you've managed to file some FOI requests
what an outstanding accomplishment.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut You and colonel sound like 8 year olds, downplaying and making personal attacks on people on the internet (very original). It has been like what a billion pages now in this thread and with every letter you two type you are discrediting your cause and making yourselves look like a-holes. You remind me of when I played road hockey as child and the kids we gave a beating to would bitch and whine all the way home with every excuse in the world. Guess what they still lost and are still bitchy whiny losers. |
And you are the most retarded engineer (supposedly) I have ever encountered. It has been at least 50 pages and you still cannot back up one dam thing you have polluted this forum with.
Bravo. You and PKC should get married.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by culorut And you are the most retarded engineer (supposedly) I have ever encountered. It has been at least 50 pages and you still cannot back up one dam thing you have polluted this forum with. Bravo. You and PKC should get married. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.