TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Religious debate on Jews/Passion of the Christ
Pages (24): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade I've been following this debate for a while and it's just confirming what I've suspected for a long time. Without wishing to seem disrespectful to the theists on this board, it's becoming increasingly clear to me that the cause of the "rationalists" and the "atheists" here is futile for one very simple reason: religious statements - across the board - are not statements of truth. No atheist (and we are all born atheists remember) ever enters any system of theological belief because, upon careful weighing of the evidence, he believes it to espouse irrefutable empirical, metaphysical or ontological fact. Nor are religious statements - as the theists would have us believe - statements of belief or faith. No-one submits themselves unquestioningly to an ideology because they have a "hunch" it might be true - no right thinking individual anyway. Given this it is futile to argue with a theist. Their ideology is not bound up in truth, nor with faith or belief - the subjective, bastard sisters of truth. If it were, the deconversion process - where an individual realises via objective, dispassionate scepticism - would be much more common and much less traumatic. But it is here, in the trauma of deconversion, that we uncover the true nature of religious statements - they are statements of hope, nothing more, nothing less. "I know that heaven exists" is not a statement of truth. "I believe that heaven exists" is not a statement of truth, nor is it a statement of well-founded or intractable belief. "I have faith in the validity of the Bible, in which God declares that heaven exists" is not a statement of truth, a statement of well-founded or intractable belief, nor a statement of dispassionate credulity. All these statements convey the same message with differing degrees of self-delusion, namely: "I hope that heaven exists". Therefore, theists do not find it difficult to rid themselves of theological beliefs because they are scared to compromise any facets of their tightly interwoven systems of truth, belief and faith (we shed held truisms, beliefs and faiths on a daily basis as we acquire new knowledge - however seemingly significant - into the world around us) but because they are scared to abandon the most primitive, yet perhaps the most important of all our psychological, systemtic processes: that is, the systemic process of hope. It's difficult to abandon the hope that we may have been created rather than evolved, that we may be able to live forever, that there may an omnibenevolent being forever watching over and guiding us, or that our life has some pre-ordained purpose - hence the trauma of the deconversion process and the unwillingness to truly delve into religious belief on a sincere epistemic, ontological or metaphysical level. Regardless of what intractable fact you sling at the theist, the religious beliefs will remain in tact simply because your not targeting the arguments at the right psychological schemata - the key to deconverting theists (not that I advocate proselytism of any sort - be it theistic or atheistic) lies not in undermining the empirical or logical evidence supporting the existence of a God, but rather in removing the dependancy on hope - the "emotional crutch" or "opiate" of the theist if you like - vested in this deity. Similarly I believe in religious Darwinism. The religions that most strongly cling to this formula are those most likely to survive. Any religion that encourages free-thought or open-scepticism, or any religion that bases its ideologies on issues of fact or epistemology - for instance - is likely to fail, simply because it renders itself open to falsification. The second doubt is cast on this sort of religion religion, its adherents abandon it, for they have no emotional stake in the preservation of its ideological intergrity. The religion most likely to survive, therefore, is the one its adherents are least likely to reject. Now as religions based on fact (and belief and - to a degree - faith) are easy to for its adherents to shed (just as more mudane "facts" and "beliefs" are shed in day-to-day life as we become privy to more knowledge) they cannot survive long. On the other hand, those religions capable of fostering hope and then creating an emotional dependancy on the preservation of this hope, are highly likely to survive (especially if this fostering of hope is coupled with the rejection of the validty of empirical knowledge - a la Islamo-Christian Avoerism - and a culture of credulity and anti-skepticism). In this context, a religion can only survive if it makes sure it establishes an emotional dependance within its adherent based on the baseless "hopes" of the latter. Christianity goes one step beyond this "Darwinism", however. In addition to latching onto generic, latent human hopes (hope of transcending death, hope of a greater purpose etc.) it creates its own need for "hope" by poking yet more holes in the human ego, creating an even greater need for hope and - from this - an inescapable emotional dependancy on its own theology, that cannot be satisfied by any other. I posted this on another forum: Christianity contains within itself a perfect circular mechanism - it makes man sick so that it may offer him the cure. If you are able to fully convince a man that he is debauched, weak and that he is a sinner against the rest of mankind from the point of his conception, then he is more likely to be susceptable to your promise of "salvation". However, once one accepts this salvation and the rest of the message Christianity prescribes, one simply retreats further into self-depreciation - man becomes yet more convinced of his evil nature and of his weakness and as he does so he becomes even more dependent on the salvation offered through Christ. From this point there is no going back: one cannot be so convinced of one's own debauched worthlessness and then expect to function without some hope for redemption. People find it difficult to stray from the flock because after accepting the disease (Christianity's pesimism concerning man-kind) the only cure comes in the form of a 2000 year old man wearing a robe and sandals. Thus the only way to help a Christian from his "cage", as Neitzsche put it, is not to convince him that God doesn't exist or that Jesus never rose from the dead (or any other argument of a metaphysical, empirical or logical nature), but merely to convince him that man-kind is not sick, it is not debauched, and that every one of us is a unique, free-thinking moral agent with the power to help and work for both himself and the rest of man-kind. Once a Christian is "rescued" from his self-depreciation - freed from his disease - all of a sudden the "cure" laid out in Christian theology no longer quite seems so appealing. He may never free himself from theism, but he will be free of his emotional dependence on theism and, as an atheist, I believe that that is the first step towards true redemption. After all, what good is the cure if you no longer have the disease? |
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome.
- Isaac Asimov
| quote: |
| Originally posted by arctic I don't see a difference myself, but read into it what you will. Actually, I'm not entirely sure if you're joking or if you're being serious here. Stop confusing me. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Heinz alyssa....DEBATE OR STFU!!!!!!!!!! PM me if u dont understand... If God did not exist, then our world as we know it, would tumble into chaos. what prevents this galaxy of milky way to collide into another, or our planet to be not pulled into the sun. the sun is bigger than all planets in the solar system combined, but yet we have an orbit, the same every year. |
| quote: |
I could go on and on about darkness and light. take science out of this, because science proves nothing but the material physical world. it cant prove thought, existance, or logic. it measures the measurable. its proves what can be proved. if something has mathematical properties to it, it is scienctific. if no then it is not scientific. the bible is not a scientific book, therefore you cannot look at it as though you are a scientist. You people will never understand christianity or god, jesus, the bible, church. your eyes are closed. u are in darkness, and hate the light. do u know where your life is going?? in the dark, can you see where you are going?? no...you cannot. you dont know your future. but, in the light, can u not see where u walk?? in darkness, u know nothing but what u can touch. but you CANNOT SEE!! but few of you will understand what i have said.... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by TranceGiant idiot |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 Again,freewill. It's what you choose. The only way to heaven is to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior into your heart. I do know some religious folk believe that good deeds get you into heaven..but, there's a verse in the Bible that says there's only one way,and that way is accepting Jesus into your heart. People can be very good,and do very good deeds,but that doesn't mean that they're permitted into heaven. I hope you get what I'm saying. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider I'm surprised more people aren't jumping on this silliness. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider I'm surprised more people aren't jumping on this silliness. Nessa, is it moral and/or just for a God to exclude those who have been good their entire lives yet merely fail to accept Jesus Christ while admitting a prolific sinner to heaven simply because he confesses his sins prior to death? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Cyrus King I was just about to... Nellie... your posts are making you look more pathetic every time. I cant beleive how adament you are at spewing out all this nonsense. THERE IS NOOOOOOOOOOOOO HEAVEN WITH GREAT GREEN FIELDS AND CANDY WITH PEOPLE AND KIDS PLAYING WITH LIONS!!!!!!!! There is no evidence this exists... only faith created it. Stop speaking as if its the truth. Unfortunately, none of us will know if it exists or not after we die because the neurons in our brains stop working!!!!!!! WE ROT... eaten by bacteria...that is your "heaven" |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by arctic I don't see a difference myself, but read into it what you will. Actually, I'm not entirely sure if you're joking or if you're being serious here. Stop confusing me. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 Again,God sent Jesus to die on the cross for us, so that none of us would have to go to hell. So, if people don't choose to accept him, that's their own fault. Not his. He won't interfere with freewill. You have to remeber that. I've heard of many people making it right just before they pass on.Like my grandmother just did last month. That does happen a lot,because you are staring death right in the face. But, it isn't silliness. |
Nessa answer me this:
Two missionaries are out in Africa, the first missionary only helps those who belief in his faith ... even if they are wicked at the expense of those who are innocent and deserving of help such as children. The second missionary helps those who are deserving of help the most - the sickest, those in abject poverty, those who are simply trying to lead good lives. He is concerned with their health and helps them without question and then, only after they have benefited from his aid, teaches them about the Lord.
Who is the better samaritan?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MisterOpus1 I don't think this answered his question, so let me rephrase it as an example: Why does God allow rapists and serial murderers to enter into Heaven if they willfully (and truly) feel repentance, but yet will not allow a dutiful Buddhist who's done nothing but contribute his life to the well-being of mankind? IOW, if this is true, why would we all need to live a civil life when all we need to do is willfully and truly give our lives to Jesus at the very last moment of death, but prior to that we can rape, pillage, murder, and chop up anyone we see fit (kinda like some folks in the Old Testament, Judges 19:22-30?) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider Nessa answer me this: Two missionaries are out in Africa, the first missionary only helps those who belief in his faith ... even if they are wicked at the expense of those who are innocent and deserving of help such as children. The second missionary helps those who are deserving of help the most - the sickest, those in abject poverty, those who are simply trying to lead good lives. He is concerned with their health and helps them without question and then, only after they have benefited from his aid, teaches them about the Lord. Who is the better samaritan? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 Good deeds,Don't get you into heaven. do you understand that? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 Again,God sent Jesus to die on the cross for us, so that none of us would have to go to hell. So, if people don't choose to accept him, that's their own fault. Not his. He won't interfere with freewill. You have to remeber that. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 I did answer his question.Maybe he just didn't like my answer. God allows all those who have asked Jesus Christ into their heart,and repented of their sins. Good deeds,Don't get you into heaven. do you understand that? |
9/10 Criminals prefer christianity 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tathi 9/10 Criminals prefer christianity |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MisterOpus1 Yes. Thank you. So I guess I can go ahead and murder, rape, and cut up into pieces innocent people as long as I accept Jesus some time before I die. Cool. I guess I DO actually like this Christian God afterall. I mean, if he allows men to do it to innocent concubines like they did in Judges 19:22-30, why can't I? Yea Christianity! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by WhoaNellie1487 Good deeds,Don't get you into heaven. do you understand that? |
. I would rather rot an enternity in hell with the people who do good rather than stand the stench of hypocrisy in a "utopian" heaven surrounded by murderers, pedophiles, and rapists who sell out their beliefs to escape damnation. It's nothing but an overglorified system of bribery. Rather pathetic actually that people think like this since a morally just and "good" God is antagonistic to this behaviour.
| quote: |
| LOL yes. I would love to hear what jesus would say about this. What a compassionate God the "christian" God is . I would rather rot an enternity in hell with the people who do good rather than stand the stench of hypocrisy in a "utopian" heaven surrounded by murderers, pedophiles, and rapists who sell out their beliefs to escape damnation. It's nothing but an overglorified system of bribery. Rather pathetic actually that people think like this since a morally just and "good" God is antagonistic to this behaviour. |
I want all of you to think long and hard about this passage. long AND hard.
Romans 2:5
But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God's wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed.
one day, if still you have not accepted the reality of god, one day u will. he will be revealed to you, right in front of you. as u wanted. u will SEE him, TALK to him, FEEL him, HEAR him. that will be your proof. u want science, u want evidence, u want this and that. YOU WILL GET SOMETHING EVEN BETTER THAN THAT!! u will see him right there in front of you, in your face, asking u what. what to what? u will find out.
i give u evidence. from the bible. and thats the only evidence i need. ask me any question and i bet u, i will have a response directly from the bible. so dont get mad, because i have ONE SOURCE thats the most crediable source living man has in its precious possession.
----------------------
My challenge for you is to ask me any logical, intelligent question, anything pertaining to the subject. and i will answer you from the bible. not from myself, or from any human being. and i want you to know. the bible isnt a "book" it is the Word of God. when i quote the bible, that is the literal speaking of god. the bible is god "speaking to you" believe it or not.
| quote: |
| one day, if still you have not accepted the reality of god, one day u will. he will be revealed to you, right in front of you. as u wanted. u will SEE him, TALK to him, FEEL him, HEAR him. that will be your proof. u want science, u want evidence, u want this and that. YOU WILL GET SOMETHING EVEN BETTER THAN THAT!! u will see him right there in front of you, in your face, asking u what. what to what? u will find out. |
| quote: |
| Originally Posted by God You are an indoctrinated fool |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider LOL yes. I would love to hear what jesus would say about this. What a compassionate God the "christian" God is . I would rather rot an enternity in hell with the people who do good rather than stand the stench of hypocrisy in a "utopian" heaven surrounded by murderers, pedophiles, and rapists who sell out their beliefs to escape damnation. It's nothing but an overglorified system of bribery. Rather pathetic actually that people think like this since a morally just and "good" God is antagonistic to this behaviour. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tathi i'm talking to god face to face now, in fact i'll let him write a couple of words to you |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.