TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Those pesky Iranians at it again.
Pages (12): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 »


Posted by jonSun on Apr-09-2007 03:41:

Freed Iranian diplomat says US tortured him


An Iranian diplomat freed two months after being kidnapped in Iraq has said he was tortured by United States forces while in captivity, Iran's Fars News Agency has reported.

Iran has blamed the US military for his abduction, while US officials deny any role.

His comments follow the release of 15 British troops from Iran, where they say they were ill-treated.

"Jalal Sharafi, in an interview with Fars, explained how he had been kidnapped and tortured severely by American forces with the help of agents working for Iraq's communications organisation, which works under the supervision of the CIA," Fars News Agency said.

"He showed reporters the marks left by torture on his body that are now being treated by doctors."


http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitem...04/s1892118.htm


Posted by hardcore trancer on Apr-09-2007 04:35:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
Freed Iranian diplomat says US tortured him


An Iranian diplomat freed two months after being kidnapped in Iraq has said he was tortured by United States forces while in captivity, Iran's Fars News Agency has reported.

Iran has blamed the US military for his abduction, while US officials deny any role.

His comments follow the release of 15 British troops from Iran, where they say they were ill-treated.

"Jalal Sharafi, in an interview with Fars, explained how he had been kidnapped and tortured severely by American forces with the help of agents working for Iraq's communications organisation, which works under the supervision of the CIA," Fars News Agency said.

"He showed reporters the marks left by torture on his body that are now being treated by doctors."


http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitem...04/s1892118.htm



see "The west" doesnt give a fuck about what has happend to him and they see no problems with him being totured since he is from a terrorist nation.


Posted by Marc Summers on Apr-09-2007 05:32:

free the middle east

free them!


Posted by NeoPhono on Apr-09-2007 13:12:

A couple "things" with the Iranian torture story.

1. He was abducted from Baghdad, not a member of the group of northern Iranian officials taken by American personnel that made the news a few weeks back. He was abducted by Iraqi police, not Americans. There's no denying he was in "Iraqi waters."

2. I find the timing extremely odd that days after he was released, and a day after the British soldiers were released, he decides to come forward with his story. It claims that he is currently hospitalized for the injuries he received, but instead of seeing those grievous injuries, we are told that he "showed them to reporters."

3. Why is he so adamant about it being the CIA? Did people really approach him saying "we're with the CIA, prepare to be tortured?" He said that he was interrogated in Arabic and English, but does that (if it happened) preclude any other possible group.


Who the hell knows, it could have happened, although it seems awfully sloppy by the CIA if it did. It's just a bit peculiar that a day after allegations of bad conditions by the British soldiers on the part of Iran, a mysterious Iranian figure, who no one seems to know, comes forward and professes that he too was tortured, although no injuries are shown or great specifics given, and is adamant it was the US CIA.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Apr-09-2007 17:22:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
ya they went through hell alright .


Yea, because only you know the true story...

I suppose in your mind, this whole thing was contrived by their (UK) government to 'make the Iranians look evil' huh?


Posted by M.Johan on Apr-09-2007 18:22:

quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono
A couple "things" with the Iranian torture story.

1. He was abducted from Baghdad, not a member of the group of northern Iranian officials taken by American personnel that made the news a few weeks back. He was abducted by Iraqi police, not Americans. There's no denying he was in "Iraqi waters."

2. I find the timing extremely odd that days after he was released, and a day after the British soldiers were released, he decides to come forward with his story. It claims that he is currently hospitalized for the injuries he received, but instead of seeing those grievous injuries, we are told that he "showed them to reporters."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2052596,00.html
Not the only one


5 've kiddnapped by US




quote:
3. Why is he so adamant about it being the CIA? Did people really approach him saying "we're with the CIA, prepare to be tortured?" He said that he was interrogated in Arabic and English, but does that (if it happened) preclude any other possible group.


Who the hell knows, it could have happened, although it seems awfully sloppy by the CIA if it did. It's just a bit peculiar that a day after allegations of bad conditions by the British soldiers on the part of Iran, a mysterious Iranian figure, who no one seems to know, comes forward and professes that he too was tortured, although no injuries are shown or great specifics given, and is adamant it was the US CIA.


**************
Some ex

http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2264645.ece



http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006...459_page2.shtml

OR

tranceaddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > New Accounts of Torture by U.S. Troops...


Posted by pmoisse on Apr-09-2007 19:07:

There was more video released today showing the marines laughing and playing ping pong, eating together and talking, and generally looking pretty chill and relaxed given the circumstances.

I know that things can be staged and all that shit, but they didn't look too stressed in this new video and they certainly weren't going about things in a way that would suggest they were being told to play ping pong at gunpoint.

It's also pretty disgusting and disrespectful that these troops are being allowed to whore their story to the highest bidder while they're still in service. This makes me think that the MoD wants to use these stories in the propaganda war with Iran since so far, their story of terror and poor treatment isn't really coming across too well given the contradicting video evidence.


Posted by M.Johan on Apr-09-2007 19:45:

quote:
Originally posted by pmoisse
There was more video released today showing the marines laughing and playing ping pong, eating together and talking, and generally looking pretty chill and relaxed given the circumstances.

I know that things can be staged and all that shit, but they didn't look too stressed in this new video and they certainly weren't going about things in a way that would suggest they were being told to play ping pong at gunpoint.

It's also pretty disgusting and disrespectful that these troops are being allowed to whore their story to the highest bidder while they're still in service. This makes me think that the MoD wants to use these stories in the propaganda war with Iran since so far, their story of terror and poor treatment isn't really coming across too well given the contradicting video evidence.

+1

http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/v...07_2300,00.html
beside this there're many images show these things

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...5/wiran1205.xml


Posted by hardcore trancer on Apr-10-2007 01:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Yea, because only you know the true story...


If Iran actually wanted to teach em a good leason they would have hanged every single one of them infront of millions but they didnt instead they got the best fuckin treatment they could possibly get as a prisoners.


Posted by CHRles on Apr-10-2007 02:17:

Ah yes, Tranceaddict's infamous terrorist lovers always looking for an angle to bash the West, and now bash the former hostages. Even if Iran went to their homes and slaughtered their families you'd still be seeing them come here and defend Iran's actions


Posted by NeoPhono on Apr-10-2007 03:05:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
If Iran actually wanted to teach em a good leason they would have hanged every single one of them infront of millions but they didnt instead they got the best fuckin treatment they could possibly get as a prisoners.



Can you clarify that statement? It reads as "they should have killed them, but they didn't and thus were treated well."


Posted by hardcore trancer on Apr-10-2007 03:36:

quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono
Can you clarify that statement? It reads as "they should have killed them, but they didn't and thus were treated well."



Iam just saying they simply "could have" killed these soldiers if they wanted to but instead they got treated very well.


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Apr-10-2007 04:21:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
If Iran actually wanted to teach em a good leason they would have hanged every single one of them infront of millions but they didnt instead they got the best fuckin treatment they could possibly get as a prisoners.

I think you're missing any semblance of logic that Iran even tries to feign lately.

For being such a Iranian sympathizer, them following your path of logic would lead to annihilation. Not too profitable in the long term for the nation, right?

I can pretty much assure that prisoners won't be taken so close to borders again. If I were the US and Britain, I'd say to let your ship get sunk next time you're within a few miles, at least your location isn't disputed if a ship goes down. Then there's full-out worldwide condemnation for them breaching UN territory borders.


Posted by Magnetonium on Apr-10-2007 04:29:

quote:
Originally posted by CHRles
Magnetonium loves to distorts history and the facts at hand. I love how he always leaves out Russia as that country has a lot of blame to go around.
The U.S never supported the Taliban or Al Qaeda. ...


The section in bold is all I needed to see. You are absolutely wrong. Dead wrong. There are even videos of Taliban shaking hands with American government officials in USA, in Texas talking to oil executives, plus all the Senate oversights on American support and funding of both Al Qaeda and Taliban ... boy, you are such a bloody fool. You are the one who supports the terrorists by allowing United States government to give rise to these groups. Just like what they are doing in Pakistan helping the guerillas attack Iran.

What your puny little brain doesnt understand is that these terrorists were created and supported by USA initially for which my fellow Canadians are now dying in Afghanistan. We would have never had to go there if Americans waited a few years as Soviets were faltering at home with economy and political upheaval. Soviet Union didnt collapse because Americans funded the resistance within. And all the problems today around Middle East can be directly linked to US and British red flag operations, backed and supported terrorism including supporting and helping Saddam terrorize Iran and his own people using chemical weapons in 1980s that USA allowed them to use and they also put a veto in UN when the world tried to stop Saddam. I know what democracy is, but I dont feel comfortable watching and seeing how Americans are creating and helping the rise of these terrorists again.

If only USA let things sort out on their own, like happened in Lybia. Lybians were once against USA. Eventually after they got things sorted out on their own, and today Lybia is friend of US. If USA used red flag operations, and funded and started another terrorist group for resistance, today Lybia would be a terrorist state or very radical and most likely backlashed and became anti-American.

EDIT: The uprising and conflicts, resistance, problems in Iraq and Afghanistan shows that democracy cannot be spread by force and succeed. It is failing. The failed campaign shows the great power and capabilities of American military machine. Only in Baghdad for most part American military can provide security and stability in Iraq, with hard work and lots of troops. Outside of main cities its no-mans land, lawlessness, crime and hostage taking has become rampant. Democracy is failing.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Apr-10-2007 05:59:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Iam just saying they simply "could have" killed these soldiers if they wanted to but instead they got treated very well.


Very well???

Not according to the soldiers themselves now that they're back...

Iran's propaganda does work on some people I guess...


Posted by hardcore trancer on Apr-10-2007 06:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Very well???

Not according to the soldiers themselves now that they're back...

Iran's propaganda does work on some people I guess...




well wtf did you expect them to say? that we got treated like kings there?knowing full well that their own government hates that regime.
How do you know that the British government didnt force them to say those things?is that so hard to believe?is it so hard to beleive they want the world to always look at Iran as some fuckedup terrorist nation?


Posted by venomX on Apr-10-2007 07:20:

quote:
Originally posted by CHRles
Ah yes, Tranceaddict's infamous terrorist lovers always looking for an angle to bash the West, and now bash the former hostages. Even if Iran went to their homes and slaughtered their families you'd still be seeing them come here and defend Iran's actions


So personal stories (which are subject to many types of bias) are more accurate than video account. Someone already said that it could well be staged, but they look awfully relaxed to be being filmed at gun point. Seriously, a bit of critical thinking would be appreciated. Many things could be happening here and plenty more evidence is sure to come out on both sides. What if they truly were treated well? What then? Will you just deny it (as you're doing with the video evidence) and confirm your biases with some other information? You're as bad as any of the other fanatics on here, rooting blindly for the home team.


Posted by LazFX on Apr-10-2007 09:53:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Iam just saying they simply "could have" killed these soldiers if they wanted to but instead they got treated very well.


and if they did, I bet you would of been very happy.....you would of went through a whole bottle of Jergins tossing off to the soldiers hanging huh?? You Terrorist Supporters on this board MAKE ME want to Throw Up!!

Do yo honestly think your life would be so much better under thier rule??

fucking kids.... think you know everything just cause you open a book and take a few classes at the Uni
I would pay for your trip to Iran so you could go and visit these Muslim Clerics and try to convince them that your love for Trance Music and the Westernized Lifestyle you live in can co-exist with their strict dogma... ha ha yeah right!!


you are retarded and an Idiot, a complete waste of life and you give Canada's Arab/Persian population a bad name.
Why do you support a regime that is not progressive??


Posted by M.Johan on Apr-10-2007 10:26:

AGAIN

They are treated very well



watch video
http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/v...07_2300,00.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...5/wiran1205.xml

TWO main obvious dangerous points must be mentiond:

1.About the blindfolding ,it's a wellknown action before their
talks http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...d=1766&ito=1490

As u see the iranian protests had held these image

before the sailores were released from Iran.






quote:
Sailors' statement in full

Last Updated: 1:23am BST 06/04/2007


Here is the full statement made by the 15 service personnel held in Iran following their return to the UK:

"It goes without saying that we are extremely happy to be back in the UK and reunited with our loved ones.

"Touching down at Heathrow this morning was for all of us a dream come true and the welcome home that we have enjoyed today was one that none of us will ever forget.

"The past two weeks have been very difficult but by staying together as a team we kept our spirits up, drawing great comfort from the knowledge that our loved ones would be waiting for us on our return to the UK.

"It is only now that we have learned of the enormous public support we have all enjoyed in the UK and we wish to thank everyone for their thoughts, kind words and prayers. It means so much to us all.

"We all longed to be back with our loved ones and now that we are home we are all very much looking forward to spending some time with them."

"While we are extremely grateful for all the support we have had from the media, we would also ask that we have some space and privacy at this time."

The statement was followed by four quotes from some of the service personnel.

Lieutenant Felix Carman said: "On arrival at Royal Marines Barracks Chivenor, we were completely overwhelmed by the wave of good will we received.

"The support from the media, the Ministry of Defence and especially our families was incredible and we are just delighted to be back in the UK."

Operator Mechanic Arthur Batchelor said: "I am delighted to be back home and reunited with my sister and godmother.

"We started this thing together as a team and I am glad to have been reunited with our families as a team. I am looking forward to spending time with my family."

Operator Mechanic Nathan Summers said: "It is only now that we are home that we have found out just how much support we have had and we still have.

"It is a great relief to be back with friends and family."

Marine Adam Sperry said: "I am ecstatic to be back and can't wait to get home. I feel like I have a lot of people to see before I get back to my unit after leave.

"It is great to see all the positive support that we have had."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...tatement105.xml

2.They said'The past two weeks have been very difficult "but by staying together as a team we kept our spirits up", drawing great comfort from the knowledge that our loved ones would be waiting for us on our return to the UK'.


So wat's about"From there we were rushed into a room and then stuffed into a cell and didn't see another human being for six days." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...d=1766&ito=1490

These states indicate stories and events that can not be collected in time for one unit its so clear a great variation and contradiction
not a consensus saying.


Posted by pmoisse on Apr-10-2007 11:10:

quote:
Originally posted by venomX
So personal stories (which are subject to many types of bias) are more accurate than video account. Someone already said that it could well be staged, but they look awfully relaxed to be being filmed at gun point. Seriously, a bit of critical thinking would be appreciated. Many things could be happening here and plenty more evidence is sure to come out on both sides. What if they truly were treated well? What then? Will you just deny it (as you're doing with the video evidence) and confirm your biases with some other information? You're as bad as any of the other fanatics on here, rooting blindly for the home team.


Thank you.

I don't honestly believe either side 100%. Why do I need to be on one side or the other? Can't I formulate my own opinion based on the various pieces of information available?

Or is that kind of critical thinking not allowed in civilized western culture?

I think that (especially here in PDD on T/A) the apparent necessity to pick sides on any discussion seriously limits the scope of the discussion at hand. People get pissed off when they don't have any more to add and resort to personal attacks. It's not fucking useful in the least.

But hey, it seems to be the way things work, not just here, but between FoxNews, CNN and everything in between, including politics.


Posted by jonSun on Apr-10-2007 12:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r

Not according to the soldiers themselves now that they're back...




Well if i was selling my story to the highest bidder i would add some cheese & bacon to my story as well. honestly I dont blame them if they were to stretch the truth a lil bit for a couple hundred thousand more. I would prolly do the same thing if i were them.


Posted by CHRles on Apr-10-2007 13:57:

Clueless, just clueless.
If they were to be treated well you wouldnt have seen the Iranian state TV constantly parade them around. You wouldnt be hearing Iranian officials constantly changing their stories, and even threatening to put them on trial.
Again, Iran simply gave ammo to terrorist lovers like some of those found right here on this forum so they could try to argue this absurd point. The point is Iran illegally seized them and took them hostage.


Posted by NeoPhono on Apr-10-2007 15:11:

Yeah, probably not what you want to hear, but this thread has become ridiculously pointless, I think it needs to die.

Basically it's a "he said, she said," "would have, could have, might have" type of debate. No side will win the other over in this way and no side will be able to justify its position this way. It boils down to who you're more prone to believe or not believe. Because each side has reasons why they could or could not be telling the truth, there's nothing more to be said.

So, unless something new and ground breaking comes out from either side, believe what you'd like but realize that with this type of discussion the possibility of swaying the other side is nil.


The stances:

British prisoners treated well -
*The Iranians said so
*There are pictures and movies of the soldiers looking happy

British prisoners treated poorly -
*The soldiers said so


Posted by Magnetonium on Apr-10-2007 15:38:

quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono

British prisoners treated poorly -
*The soldiers said so


Well, no shit! When you are lobbied by the British tabloids who offer you hundreds of thousands of British pounds and who are hungry for the shocking stories, you'd know what they want to hear. They dont want to hear how nice, friendly and co-operative Iranians were. That doesnt sell stories in UK. Its embarassing for British military to allow these marines to publicly make money while other soldiers died in Iraq and received no such coverage or money. Read the article in the other Iranian thread of the heavy criticism these marines and the military received from British mmothers who lost their sons and daughters inn Iraq. An insult to them. And British government and military couldn't be happier to let the exagerrated story to be aired by the tabloids, just like the terrible twists and lies with the famous tabloid stories about Princess Diana's butler.


Posted by LazFX on Apr-10-2007 15:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Well, no shit! When you are lobbied by the British tabloids who offer you hundreds of thousands of British pounds and who are hungry for the shocking stories, you'd know what they want to hear. They dont want to hear how nice, friendly and co-operative Iranians were.


Wow, so even after all the lies and deception that the Iranian Gov is known for..... you still think that the horses' mouth is frigging filled with lies??

wow.....


Pages (12): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.