TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?
Pages (162): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »

[Below is a transcript of testimony in the Japanese Parliament that was broadcast live nationwide on NHK television....]

[.. The Member of Parliament talking about 911 is Yukihisa Fujita from the Democratic Party of Japan. After the testimony Mr. Fujita says he got lots of phone calls from other members of Parliament thanking him for having the bravery to bring up 911 in Parliament. He also got one death threat.
Meanwhile, I asked the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to invite him for a press conference. Each of several attempts to send an e-mail to the FCCJ about this resulting in my hotmail account freezing and my computer crashing. Also, it was amazing to watch the shameless verbal acrobatics of American corporate journalists trying to prevent this press conference from taking place. Fortunately, journalists from the rest of the world supported a press conference and we will try to get it to take place as soon as possible.
The secret government's control of Japan is falling apart. A few weeks ago one of Japan's leading commercial TV networks also broadcast a 911 truth program during prime time. One other national network and several local networks have also broadcast such programs.
The people of Japan do not want to finance genocidal mass murderers any more.


http://benjaminfulford.com/Transcri...20of%20911.html

quote:

Originally posted by {b.s.e.} [Below is a transcript of testimony in the Japanese Parliament that was broadcast live nationwide on NHK television....] [.. The Member of Parliament talking about 911 is Yukihisa Fujita from the Democratic Party of Japan. After the testimony Mr. Fujita says he got lots of phone calls from other members of Parliament thanking him for having the bravery to bring up 911 in Parliament. He also got one death threat. Meanwhile, I asked the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to invite him for a press conference. Each of several attempts to send an e-mail to the FCCJ about this resulting in my hotmail account freezing and my computer crashing. Also, it was amazing to watch the shameless verbal acrobatics of American corporate journalists trying to prevent this press conference from taking place. Fortunately, journalists from the rest of the world supported a press conference and we will try to get it to take place as soon as possible. The secret government's control of Japan is falling apart. A few weeks ago one of Japan's leading commercial TV networks also broadcast a 911 truth program during prime time. One other national network and several local networks have also broadcast such programs. The people of Japan do not want to finance genocidal mass murderers any more. http://benjaminfulford.com/Transcri...20of%20911.html

For once, that was actually an interesting post in this thread.

May-June 2004: Zelikow Has Portions of 9/11 Commission Report Rewritten to Be More Favorable to National Security Adviser Rice





9/11 Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow tells the staff team working on the Bush administration�s response to terrorist threats in the summer of 2001 that their drafts must be rewritten to cast National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice in a better light. Rice�s testimony about the administration�s prioritizing of terrorism has been contradicted by former counterterrorism �tsar� Richard Clarke, who said that al-Qaeda was not a high priority for the White House. The commission staffers think that Clarke is telling the truth, because, in the words of author Philip Shenon, Clarke had left a �vast documentary record� about the White House�s inattention to terrorism. Clarke�s account is also corroborated by other National Security Council (NSC) members, the CIA, and the State Department.

Zelikow's Reaction - However, Zelikow, a close associate of Rice (see 1995 and January 3, 2001), tells the staffers their version is �too Clarke-centric� and demands �balance.� Shenon will comment: �He never said so explicitly, but Zelikow made clear to [the staffers] that the commission�s final report should balance out every statement of Clarke�s with a statement from Rice. The team should leave out any judgment on which of them was telling the truth.�

Support from Commission Lawyer - Zelikow is supported to a point in this dispute by Daniel Marcus, the commission�s lawyer. Marcus thinks that the staffers are making Clarke into a �superhero,� and that there were some �limitations and flaws� in his performance. Marcus also sees that the staff�s suspicions of Zelikow and his ties to Rice are no longer hidden, but will later say: �In a sense they overreacted to Philip because they were so worried about him they pushed and pushed and pushed, and sometimes they were wrong.�

Staffer Regrets Not Resigning Earlier - One of the key staffers involved in the dispute, Warren Bass, had previously considered resigning from the commission due to what he perceived as Zelikow�s favoring of Rice. At this point he regrets not resigning earlier, but does not do so now. Bass and his colleagues merely console themselves with the hope that the public will read between the lines and work out that Clarke is telling the truth and Rice is not.

"Tortured Passages" - Shenon will comment: �[T]he results of the team�s work were some of the most tortured passages in the final report, especially in the description of the performance of the NSC in the first months of the Bush presidency. It was written almost as a point, counterpoint�Clarke says this, Rice says the opposite�with no conclusion about what the truth finally was.�


http://www.historycommons.org/conte...0504basszelikow

lol, Love him or hate him: Alex Jones was spot on, July 25th, 2001.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3...dicts-9-11_news

"He's the boogeyman they need, in this phony Orwellian system."

In reference to bin Laden, CIA asset.

quote:

Originally posted by {b.s.e.} lol, Love him or hate him: Alex Jones was spot on, July 25th, 2001. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3...dicts-9-11_news "He's the boogeyman they need, in this phony Orwellian system." In reference to bin Laden, CIA asset.

but only after Bill Cooper called it in June of that year

I made this next video start right before he talks about OBL.

Listen to what he says:



[[ LINK REMOVED ]]

9/11: Attack On The Pentagon



Pilots For 9/11 Truth brings you analysis never seen before regarding the Attack On The Pentagon. Highly technical analysis presented in a way that the layman will appreciate and understand. A 757 reported to have caused the damage at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 is analyzed based on topography, obstacles, flight data, physics, and witness statements. In order to accurately determine and understand the nature of the attack, Pilots For 9/11 Truth constructed a 3D scale model of the Arlington area complete with US Geological Survey Topography, obstacles, structures and vehicles. Based on flight data, physics and witness statements, we take you to Arlington on that fateful day, observing through the eyes of those who were there. We let the viewer determine if it is possible for a 757 to navigate such a region and cause the physical damage reported at the Pentagon. Many common arguments made by those who make excuse for and support the government story are also addressed.

I think it suffices to say that those not willing to think for themselves in this situation, and are waiting for a government approved scientific faction to tell them that 'they did it' are hopeless at this point. It's textbook denial, and utterly useless to antagonise them any further at this point.

I agree but to refute the facts just helps the cause.

quote:

Originally posted by {b.s.e.} I think it suffices to say that those not willing to think for themselves in this situation, and are waiting for a government approved scientific faction to tell them that 'they did it' are hopeless at this point. It's textbook denial, and utterly useless to antagonise them any further at this point.

So we should accept at face value your view of history, or what? Not be free-thinkers?

We're skeptical because we don't believe the facts support your case. DEAL WITH IT. You're entitled to your opinion, but at least respect mine, as I respect yours man..

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton So we should accept at face value your view of history, or what? Not be free-thinkers? We're skeptical because we don't believe the facts support your case. DEAL WITH IT. You're entitled to your opinion, but at least respect mine, as I respect yours man..

I didn't say that whatsoever, merely commenting on the obvious impasse on the topic at large.

You're right, however. Everyone is entitle to make what they can with what is available.

I should have expressed my disenfranchisement of the thread in a more respectful manner.

quote:

Originally posted by {b.s.e.} I didn't say that whatsoever, merely commenting on the obvious impasse on the topic at large. You're right, however. Everyone is entitle to make what they can with what is available. I should have expressed my disenfranchisement of the thread in a more respectful manner.

Nah, it's cool man. Other's in thread seem to go out of there way to chastise anyone who not in lock step with their version of history. Agree or you've been deceived!!! OH NOEZZZ!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton So we should accept at face value your view of history, or what? Not be free-thinkers? We're skeptical because we don't believe the facts support your case. DEAL WITH IT. You're entitled to your opinion, but at least respect mine, as I respect yours man..

I'm rather curious as to what your definition of respect is.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z I'm rather curious as to what your definition of respect is.

I dunno...how about the insinuation that disagreement means the other guy is a troll. If I recall, "troll" is currently, by far, the most commonly used "cop out", out of a debate in the PDD. Really, it goes to a lack of tolerance to criticism. That's just real tough for those in this particular thread who can not handle criticism. Really feel sorry for them...

I'll use trancer-x's excellent reply for you since you trolls don't read.

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X What are these baseless claims that you speak of? Care to elaborate? I think that perhaps you should take a good look at the hypocrisy of your own words. In just about every one of your posts you blindly defend the indefensible so how else do you think that I would perceive you besides being some cowardly shill for a murderously hawkish and corrupt administration. If you really thought that what I've been posting or saying on here is so ludicrous then why would you feel such a need to resort to personal attacks and underhanded insinuations in the attempt to defame me? Why not try to refute the points which have been brought up? BECAUSE YOU CAN'T!! It's classic perception management and it's obvious to others besides myself especially when your feathers become ruffled when I call you out on it. I was actually joking about it with a friend the other day, saying to watch how quick the roaches crawl out of the woodwork to attack me when I post in this 9/11 thread. lmfao If you really thought that I was full of crap and offered no evidence about 9/11 then you would be able to simply leave me alone but no, you're stuck in this thread like white on rice. I saw how you did the same thing to Colurut and now you're doing it to me, something I pretty much expected. You're pathetically grasping at whatever you can to try to discredit the messenger rather than the message itself and it's driving me to keep digging because I know that I must be doing a good job when you guys all start posting regularly in here. Hey, we already got 200 more page views this morning. Let's see if we can get it up to 1000 by tonight I need to take advantage of the fact that I'm still able to talk about these things because pretty soon it will be too late (considering that section Section 899B of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 AKA the Thought-crimes bill equates 9/11 truth with terrorism.)

quote:

Originally posted by culorut I'll use trancer-x's excellent reply for you since you trolls don't read.

Wouldn't expect anything else from the PDD's resident plagiarizers...

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton Wouldn't expect anything else from the PDD's resident plagiarizers...

He set himself up for that one.

Democracy Now! -> "Loose Change versus Popular Mechanics"

Popular Mechanic's has been dealt with numerous times it's not even funny anymore.

Popular Mechanics Debunked - Ben Chertoff

Davin Coburn of Popular Mechanics Can't Answer a Simple Question

Probably the best one.

Davin Coburn Radio Interview

Not popular mechanics but just as eye popping. Keep ignoring the truth trolls, LOL.


Senator Mark Dayton on 9-11 Commission

quote:

Originally posted by culorut Not popular mechanics but just as eye popping. Keep ignoring the truth trolls, LOL. Senator Mark Dayton on 9-11 Commission

Define truth, you uneducated plagiarizing wimp.

Shitsngiggles..


____________


The paradox of appearing 'crazy' to the skeptics is amusing. To those who wish this thread would go away, too bad. To those who mock us, get mad. The truth shall set you free. And lock up/remove a few Satan worshipers.

In this 20 minute Satellite TV interview, Richard Gage, AIA, of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth lays out all the evidence for the controlled demolition of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11.

http://www.ae911truth.org/omnitv_interview.htm

The level of twat in this forum is through the roof. Nitpicking on whether it's Motion or Momentum, barring that, oh feebleminded ones, the Laws of Physics were violated on September 11th.

quote:

The level of twat in this forum is through the roof. Nitpicking on whether it's Motion or Momentum, barring that, oh feebleminded ones, the Laws of Physics were violated on September 11th.

LOL, amen to that. Look at what kind of reply I just got for posting a completely legit video with senator Mark Dayton bashing the fuck out of the 9/11 commission.

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton Define truth, you uneducated plagiarizing wimp.

And then they wonder why they get slapped around and called out as trolls....

quote:

Originally posted by culorut And then they wonder why they get slapped around and called out as trolls....

You're the one whose too much of a pussy to debate, you plagiarizing wimp...

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.