TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- The Official 2006/2007 Toronto Raptors & NBA Thread
Pages (25): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »


Posted by mikester69 on Apr-07-2007 19:42:

I don't think we'll end up playing the wizards since were only one game ahead of Miami and they have a MUCH easier schedule. Also they have the tiebreaker against us. Most likely scenario vs Bulls or Cavs and no home court.


Posted by Sly_Guy on Apr-08-2007 15:13:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
true...but I think Sam's decision ends with the ball being in TJ's hands. i.e. I highly doubt he specifially called for Ford to shoot or even wanted that as the primary option...that's TJ's decision to drive, shoot or pass.

meh...I guess that's all speculation on my part

Calderon had the hotter hand tonight (nevermind shooting 53% vs. TJ's 44% on the season) and putting in Ford *right* at the end struck me as pointless.

oh well...here's hoping they can score home court advantage for the playoffs!


I didn't know exactly who to quote before chiming in with my Sam comments so I just added this one.

First off, the game for miami was one of the poorest coaching choices I'd seen in a long time and I tend to agree that it goes against Sam's case of being rehired next year. The strength of the Raps offense is that the defense does not know where to defend us. Everyone is willing to take and make an open shot meaning they've gotta defend 5 moving spots on the floo rather than a single player driving to the basket. Running an isolation set for a struggling [albeit fairly good] backcourt player when clearly he was being outperformed by his own substitution is 2 bad choices in one. Furthermore, the speed in which the play developed indicated poor coaching as well. 26 second left down 1 with the ball, you should be looking for the first good look. Not the first look in general. Secondly, considering we were on the road at the front end of a back to back, common basketball wisdom is to hold for last shot, because playing overtime on the road in back to backs is not advisable, yet we still rushed the shot up, looking almost for a 2 for one with a 2 second difference in shot and game clock.

All that being said, this season Sam has always gone to either Bosh or Ford in late game iso scenarios, against the strengths of our team. Being able to motivate your troops is one thing, costing them games down the stretch is another.

Beyond that, you could argue that the raps are under poor leadership all the time and not just short clock settings. Back in Janurary on one of the raps broadcasts [don't forget exactly which] I believe it was Jack who said it was strange that no one could figure out how to stop the [then surging] Raptor's offense. Instead of explaining it as the ability to share the ball, as I'd expected, he noted that the raps were running maybe 3 offensive sets only. But because of the fact that they all can shoot you can't cheat on screens, or double team effectively, so the odds are either 1 of 4 people will be open at some point, or you can get an iso for bosh and he can go work on a usually inferior player. That being said, they're more effective because of their personelle rather than creativity of offense. Couple that with our struggles on defense all season long and you get a clearer picture as to why people are calling for Sam not to be rehired.

Of and don't believe any of the Major American press organizations on why the raps are doing well. It should be really apparent to any of you who see some out of market games that because the raps don't get any national coverage down there they know very little about us. The most I've heard them do was call out our stat lines with no insight as to why the we have won the number of games we have.


And Luke Jackson will not be a raptor for long. Unless of course we clear room [via mo pete] by trading defense for offense, which is questionable given our defensive capabilities as a team. Remember Andrea is coming back and he'll be taking most of those minutes Mo Pete / Jackson were playing because I have a feeling Joey Graham and Humphries may keep their time the way they've been crashing the glass recently.

But I've now become a slightly more optimistic fan regardless, but it has a lot more to do with Agent 0 and Caron Butler being out for the season than anything the raps have done recently.

Anyway, they'd better win today, and win big.....I'm kinda in the mood for free pizza.


Posted by MarkT on Apr-08-2007 18:13:

^^^ I think the concensus is that MoPete is gone next year.

Luke Jackson is an adequate replacement, given that he'll be available at half (or less) of what MoPete will expect. I would be surprised to not see him in camp next year.

I think coaches get too much credit (and take too much blame) for what actually goes on during a game. Sure they call plays, sure they decide who's in at whatever time, but it's the players who have to execute.

Sam has, at the very least, helped keep everyone happy...there's no one complaining, no locker room dissent, no cliques, nada. Management deserves some credit there too, for bringing in the right people.

Really though...if people think Sam should go...then who should be brought in? Do you feel that Sam's shortcomings exceed the possible turmoil of brining in ANOTHER new coach? If we give players like Ford the benefit of the doubt (i.e. he's young, learning to be an NBA PG, etc), shouldn't Sam get that same learning curve opportunity? It's indisputable that he's a better head coach than he was when he first took over


Posted by Yohan on Apr-08-2007 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
^^^ I think the concensus is that MoPete is gone next year.

Luke Jackson is an adequate replacement, given that he'll be available at half (or less) of what MoPete will expect. I would be surprised to not see him in camp next year.

I think coaches get too much credit (and take too much blame) for what actually goes on during a game. Sure they call plays, sure they decide who's in at whatever time, but it's the players who have to execute.

Sam has, at the very least, helped keep everyone happy...there's no one complaining, no locker room dissent, no cliques, nada. Management deserves some credit there too, for bringing in the right people.

Really though...if people think Sam should go...then who should be brought in? Do you feel that Sam's shortcomings exceed the possible turmoil of brining in ANOTHER new coach? If we give players like Ford the benefit of the doubt (i.e. he's young, learning to be an NBA PG, etc), shouldn't Sam get that same learning curve opportunity? It's indisputable that he's a better head coach than he was when he first took over

You can have a star studded team, but without a good coach for directions, they'll never be a winning team. (New York anyone?)


Posted by MarkT on Apr-08-2007 18:25:

^^^ very true.

Although then you look at someone like Phil Jackson or Pat Riley...both great coaches, but are they *really* responsible for their team winning/losing a game...or are they responsible for maintaining an atmosphere where their talented players can thrive and co-exist? A bit of both, I suppose...I'm just disappointed at seeing a lack of love for Sam. I think he has a great future as a good coach.

College coaches are 'good coaches'...but none in recent memory have been able to replicate their NCAA success in the NBA. I think it's very much about managing egos and playing time than drawing up plays. There aren't too many 'surprise plays' that no other team has ever seen...but that's me talking out of my ass...I'm not an NBA coach and can't really say for sure

New York is a roller coaster because those egos can't be managed...you have Starbury thinking he's the best PG in the game...and a bunch of players who all think they are 'the man'...management who brings in talent without considering how the players will gel...etc. I don't think there's a coach in the league who can instantly 'fix' the Knicks, lol.


Posted by jon jon on Apr-08-2007 18:26:

a lot of you guys know A LOT about basketball, holy fuck


Posted by Yohan on Apr-08-2007 18:41:

quote:
Originally posted by jon jon
a lot of you guys know A LOT about basketball, holy fuck

We have no lives...
(hence why the word fan is a short form for 'fanatic')


Posted by Sly_Guy on Apr-08-2007 18:54:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
but are they *really* responsible for their team winning/losing a game...or are they responsible for maintaining an atmosphere where their talented players can thrive and co-exist?


This may be the case in the recent past for the NBA, as since Jordan came into his own in the NBA, every team went looking for their marketable 'star'. As a result the most talented players adopted egos almost as a birthright, making the coach not just a guy who diagrams the plays, but one who manages the relations of the players on his roster.

But it wasn't too long ago that you could go out and see a game with scores in the 110's-120's without OT. Players less concerned with their touches makes them more likely to pass the ball up for an open shot. It was a team mentality before, and with the top teams being SA, Phx, Dal, Det, and even if we wanted to put the Raps and Bulls in that category we could, the game is slowly becoming a team game again. With that, the role of the coach is again becoming more important. I've always been a supporter of the coaches role being that of organizing the method in which we play, not to be a psychiatrist for the dysfuntional, spoiled members of their team.

Sure Kobe's incredible, but where are the Lakers? 5 beats 1, everytime.

EDIT
quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
You can have a star studded team, but without a good coach for directions, they'll never be a winning team. (New York anyone?)

This is the first time I think you and I are on the same side of a basketball discussion, haha.


Posted by MarkT on Apr-08-2007 20:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Sly_Guy
This may be the case in the recent past for the NBA, as since Jordan came into his own in the NBA, every team went looking for their marketable 'star'. As a result the most talented players adopted egos almost as a birthright, making the coach not just a guy who diagrams the plays, but one who manages the relations of the players on his roster.

But it wasn't too long ago that you could go out and see a game with scores in the 110's-120's without OT. Players less concerned with their touches makes them more likely to pass the ball up for an open shot. It was a team mentality before, and with the top teams being SA, Phx, Dal, Det, and even if we wanted to put the Raps and Bulls in that category we could, the game is slowly becoming a team game again. With that, the role of the coach is again becoming more important. I've always been a supporter of the coaches role being that of organizing the method in which we play, not to be a psychiatrist for the dysfuntional, spoiled members of their team.

Sure Kobe's incredible, but where are the Lakers? 5 beats 1, everytime.

EDIT

This is the first time I think you and I are on the same side of a basketball discussion, haha.


I agree with all of that too...it is refreshing to see that the top teams are the ones who not only have a star or two...or even a decent starting lineup...but depth and coaches who actually involve all players on the court in their offense and defense.

I can't stand watching Kobe, Arenas and, to a lesser extent until he joining Denver, Iverson. Sure, they're *incredibly* talented players, but b-ball is a team game and watching 4 guys stand around while one guy runs the entire offense is not what I enjoy watching. As long as they play the way they do, I actually wish for their teams to fail (as they are doing).

The refs could ease up on the whistles for superstars too...watching Wade get every fucking foul call imagineable, especially when there not only negligible contact, but no contact at all, is sickening.


Posted by infinity HiGH on Apr-08-2007 21:31:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
I can't stand watching Kobe, Arenas and, to a lesser extent until he joining Denver, Iverson. Sure, they're *incredibly* talented players, but b-ball is a team game and watching 4 guys stand around while one guy runs the entire offense is not what I enjoy watching. As long as they play the way they do, I actually wish for their teams to fail (as they are doing).


I used to always hate Kobe for these reasons, but lately I've actually turned into a Kobe fan just because of how talented he is. You can't put Arenas, or any other player for that matter, in the same sentence as Kobe.

Outside of that though, I agree with everything you said. I like to watch TEAMS play, not just one guy (outside of Kobe).

A little O/T, but anyone else nervous about tonights game?


Posted by MarkT on Apr-09-2007 00:40:

I was nervous until the 2nd half

it looks like the curse of the Bulls is officially over

I'm already excited for next season...after some playoff experience and more time playing together, the Raps will be that much better!


Posted by infinity HiGH on Apr-09-2007 00:40:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
A little O/T, but anyone else nervous about tonights game?


so much for that


Posted by MarkT on Apr-09-2007 00:59:

bonus...Miami just lost in OT to Charlotte


Posted by infinity HiGH on Apr-09-2007 01:04:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
bonus...Miami just lost in OT to Charlotte


Excellent

Btw, I noticed the Net's (7) are only 3 games behind the Wizards (6), with six games remaining. It would be incredible if we ended up playing the Nets.


Posted by Yohan on Apr-09-2007 01:18:

Wow. Whatever Joey Graham's been sniffing, I want some!


Posted by MarkT on Apr-09-2007 02:42:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
Excellent

Btw, I noticed the Net's (7) are only 3 games behind the Wizards (6), with six games remaining. It would be incredible if we ended up playing the Nets.


ha, interesting...

as a Raptors fan, could there possibly be anything more satisfying than seeing the Raps eliminate the Nets in the ACC with Vince getting booed out of town?

awesome


Posted by TRANCEEEE on Apr-09-2007 03:11:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
ha, interesting...

as a Raptors fan, could there possibly be anything more satisfying than seeing the Raps eliminate the Nets in the ACC with Vince getting booed out of town?

awesome


as long as vince doesn't hit a three at the buzzer to win the game like he did last year to shut the ACC up...
That was bad!


Posted by exstasie on Apr-09-2007 03:15:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
I was nervous until the 2nd half

it looks like the curse of the Bulls is officially over

I'm already excited for next season...after some playoff experience and more time playing together, the Raps will be that much better!


i was at the game today! Great game overall, except for some of the officating..Flagrant foul on MoPete? BS!

But other than that...I think the raps can take on anyone in the first round.

quote:
Originally posted by TRANCEEEE
as long as vince doesn't hit a three at the buzzer to win the game like he did last year to shut the ACC up...
That was bad!


Hopefully we get the old Playoff Carter when he played fro the Raps and couldn't hit a game winner buzzer to save his life.


Posted by TRANCEEEE on Apr-09-2007 03:25:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
i was at the game today! Great game overall, except for some of the officating..Flagrant foul on MoPete? BS!


AND that ALSO reminded me of the same game, where mo pete got a technical for jokingly slapping carter
UGH that game just made me soooo angry...and I was there with a hangover...even worse


Posted by exstasie on Apr-09-2007 03:44:

quote:
Originally posted by TRANCEEEE
AND that ALSO reminded me of the same game, where mo pete got a technical for jokingly slapping carter
UGH that game just made me soooo angry...and I was there with a hangover...even worse


OH Shit..I remember that! Even carter was like wtf


CANT WAIT TILL PLAYOFFS!!!


Posted by infinity HiGH on Apr-09-2007 04:53:

hahaha, so once I again I realized something.

Even though the Nets are 3 games behind the number six seed which is Washington, Toronto is 1.5 games out of second seed. Our final five games are going to be pretty tough (Detroit twice) but we do have a chance at going into the playoffs at number 2, which would be just insane considering where the team was this time last year.


Posted by Sly_Guy on Apr-09-2007 16:10:

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
Wow. Whatever Joey Graham's been sniffing, I want some!


you took the words outta my mouth. Why do you think I said 'he's gonna keep his minutes'


Posted by DigDeep on Apr-09-2007 16:16:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
CANT WAIT TILL PLAYOFFS!!!


Neither can I

i'll be in attendence for either game 1, game 2 or BOTH


Posted by Sly_Guy on Apr-09-2007 16:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Button
Neither can I

i'll be in attendence for either game 1, game 2 or BOTH



I'm aiming for game 5. Later in the series, but very likely to happen.


Posted by exstasie on Apr-09-2007 16:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Sly_Guy
I'm aiming for game 5. Later in the series, but very likely to happen.


+1

I think it was against the Knicks a couple years ago in the first round, when we were down 2-0 after the first two games...I was at Game 3 and Game 4! WOW...all I can say is WOW...Hopefully the city of Toronto will have Raptors Fever!


When I was at the game yesterday, so many of us were watching on the TVs around the arena the end of the Islanders game...you could definitely still see that Toronto is definitely a Hockey town, but hopefully the Raptors gained a lot of fans this year...


Pages (25): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.