TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- 2008 Beijing Olympics!
Pages (18): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 »


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 17:12:

quote:
Originally posted by jon jon
lol @ american coverage, if they don't win the gold they spend 10 mins talking about how many other golds they have won in the past for said event


lol. i bitch about this every 30 minutes while watching.

they will cut to a useless sport too when the primetime sport doesn't involve American's.

Or the gymantics was brutal too. They literally went to commercial when the chinese were preforming.


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 17:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Fur
Unless they gave medals to the horses.


it's almost as if you are saying that the jockey doesn't do anything.

which is absolutely not true.


Posted by Orko on Aug-18-2008 17:23:

quote:
Originally posted by StereoPrincess
it's almost as if you are saying that the jockey doesn't do anything.

which is absolutely not true.


We know they control the horse, in the same way a driver controls a car, lets not kid ourselves, they are not doing the jumping. But, in almost every other event, the athlete is doing the work, by running, cycling, rowing, jumping...on and on. We should leave it to sports where the athlete generates the power, not an animal.


Posted by exstasie on Aug-18-2008 17:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Orko
We know they control the horse, in the same way a driver controls a car, lets not kid ourselves, they are not doing the jumping. But, in almost every other event, the athlete is doing the work, by running, cycling, rowing, jumping...on and on. We should leave it to sports where the athlete generates the power, not an animal.


Theoretically, the Horse could win the event without the need of a jockey.

However the Jockey couldn't win anything without the horse...


Posted by Orko on Aug-18-2008 17:29:

Exactly!


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 17:30:

i will let MK school all of you on horse jumping.

but i am pretty sure that the horse would not jump without the jockey.


Posted by MKpacha on Aug-18-2008 17:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Orko
Equestrian events should not be in the olympics.



you are fucking stupid.


Posted by barbina on Aug-18-2008 17:49:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
Theoretically, the Horse could win the event without the need of a jockey.

However the Jockey couldn't win anything without the horse...



They arent jockeys. They are riders. Jockeys are for horse racing.

And as a person who did Dressage/Show Jumping for almost 10 years its fucking hard.Its one of the hardest sports Ive ever taken part in. Its all about control. Its seriously underestimated.. and usually by people who have never tried it.


Posted by exstasie on Aug-18-2008 18:01:

quote:
Originally posted by barbina
They arent jockeys. They are riders. Jockeys are for horse racing.

And as a person who did Dressage/Show Jumping for almost 10 years its fucking hard.Its one of the hardest sports Ive ever taken part in. Its all about control. Its seriously underestimated.. and usually by people who have never tried it.


Sorry, Riders :P lol..i spent too much time on the horse racing, but probably not as much as you are!

Anyway, i'm defending Orko at all. I understand how hard it is to control a horse and all that stuff. I've ridden them a few times and wouldn't even want to try lol

I'm just stating that I can understand where Orko is coming from.

Like I said before...
"Theoretically, the Horse could win the event without the need of a rider.
However the rider couldn't win anything without the horse..."

Except if you're Russian...then Horse Rides you


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Aug-18-2008 18:05:

quote:
Originally posted by MKpacha
We couldn't have asked for a better equestrian team, Ian and Eric are flawless in their abilities, and Jill is such an excellent veteran. All of them have well seasoned horses who were ready for this.

Too bad for Jill's rail down, we still ended up with silver! Great Jump off to watch!


I was surprised to hear on the radio that Ian Miller hadn't won an olympic medal before...I was sure he won one with Big Ben. Its good to see that after 9 Olympics he finally has some medal around his neck.


Posted by MKpacha on Aug-18-2008 18:07:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
Theoretically, the Horse could win the event without the need of a jockey.

However the Jockey couldn't win anything without the horse...




Theoretically, you have no clue where you are coming from. Have you ever competed in show jumping? Have you ever even stood beside a jump of 6 feet+? Do you think a horse just naturally goes around a course every day for fun?

You need the horse to jump, obviously. However, the horse itself would not be able to jump any of these jumps at the height they stand without the physical training from the rider.

Most horses are unable to jump anything over 4 feet without the physical support of enough muscle in their hind end. This is developed through endless hours of endurance training (with a rider on top of the horse... a horse running around in a feild would not allow them to know how to balance or support themselves for muscle training). Like cardio, for a human.

You could not run a marathon with ease, without many months of training how to breath properly and how to hold your body, how to push when you need to, and relax certain areas in your body, you most likely would injure yourself or have great strain in your legs. You would not have the muscle ability or the knowledge to do so.

Riders attend the gym constantly working on their upper and lower bodies. Palates is very popular as it centers ones body and helps to create balance. When I used to ride, I could easily push double to triple my body weight in my legs. (YOU TRY HOLDING A 2000 LBS ANIMAL BETWEEN YOUR LEGS).


The horse is guided through a steady body, soft hands and solid support from the riders legs. You turn your head, the horse will feel it. You have to go pee, the horse will feel it. I will place you on an olympic trained horse and put you in a ring with jumps set at 1 foot (which is small enough for them to step over) gaurenteed you would be thrown from the horse in the first 10 seconds.

In tennis, the ball is hit over the net through the guidance of the players swing, through a raquette which they hold. The ball would have never made it to the other side with out that players guidance.
Just the same, the horse would never make it over the jump without the guidance of the rider. They work as a team.


A biker would never win the race without its bike, just the same, a horse would not go around a course without its rider. We are not talking about greyhound racing here. there is nothing to lour the horse to go as fast as it can around a jump with grace, skill, and stability. That comes from the rider.

I really wish not to argue about this, as I could go on for days, and it is almost pointless as there is no one else that shows at a compettive enough level as I once have to understand where I am coming from.

Horse jumping is 2 parts. The horse and the rider, together, they create a well oiled machine. They win the medal together...

You are naieve to think that riding is not a sport. You try it, at that level, and get back to me.



thanks.


Posted by I_Am_Vince on Aug-18-2008 18:13:

lol I think you just got served Jeff.

I've always wanted to try horse riding


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Aug-18-2008 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Orko
We should leave it to sports where the athlete generates the power, not an animal.


If you want to take out all sports that don't involve athletes generating the power then you would have to take out all the sailing events and shooting events.

I can think of a lot of other events that have no business being in the olympics...to start with...any sport where there are judges giving scores should be eliminated and any sport that allows professional athletes (however they wish to define a professional athlete) should be eliminated (or at least get the professionals out.)


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 18:19:

lol. i knew MK would fill you in.

as i understand, the horse is unable to jump those jumps without the rider since it's not natural for them to do. like she said, the horse just doesn't go around jumping these things. especially with 3 in a row or really high ones. also in a decent amount of time.

it's also an ancient sport of royalty. it stays in the olympics!


Posted by exstasie on Aug-18-2008 18:19:

quote:
Originally posted by MKpacha



When did I say that Riding shouldn't be a sport? Not me. I completely agree that it should be a sport and that it is probably one of the most difficult sports out there.

I am just saying that I can see where people might not see it as a sport since it isn't solely based 100% on the training and conditioning of the athlete.

No need to get all defensive...i'm not the one who said that it isn't a sport lol


Posted by exstasie on Aug-18-2008 18:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Invasionmix
lol I think you just got served Jeff.

I've always wanted to try horse riding


pshh..whatever...

People don't know what Theoretically means lol...

or maybe I should of used hypothetically instead...

Hypothetically, do you need to use a horse in Horse racing? Can you just ride on the back of some ugly chick (who looks like a horse) and get her to jump the rails for you?


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 18:24:

quote:
Originally posted by MKpacha
In tennis, the ball is hit over the net through the guidance of the players swing, through a raquette which they hold. The ball would have never made it to the other side with out that players guidance.
Just the same, the horse would never make it over the jump without the guidance of the rider. They work as a team.


A biker would never win the race without its bike, just the same, a horse would not go around a course without its rider. We are not talking about greyhound racing here. there is nothing to lour the horse to go as fast as it can around a jump with grace, skill, and stability. That comes from the rider.


i think these two points are the key. the horse is considered equipment and so much more than that because it's equipment that also has a mind of it's own so it's much much harder.


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 18:26:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
People don't know what Theoretically means lol...


no no. she said that even theoretically the horse could not do it without the rider. it's a horse, lol.


Posted by MKpacha on Aug-18-2008 18:27:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
pshh..whatever...

People don't know what Theoretically means lol...

or maybe I should of used hypothetically instead...

Hypothetically, do you need to use a horse in Horse racing? Can you just ride on the back of some ugly chick (who looks like a horse) and get her to jump the rails for you?



Realistically, placed in a show ring with 9-20 jumps in a sequenced course, no, the horse would not go around, at all. It would walk back to the gate, and look out at the crowd around it, freak out and run around, eat some plants used in the jump set up (or grass if it's a grass ring), whinny, or stand there with a blank look on its face.


So no, Theoretically, you are incorrect.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Aug-18-2008 18:28:

quote:
Originally posted by MKpacha
Realistically, placed in a show ring with 9-20 jumps in a sequenced course, no, the horse would not go around, at all. It would walk back to the gate, and look out at the crowd around it, freak out and run around, eat some plants used in the jump set up (or grass if it's a grass ring), whinny, or stand there with a blank look on its face.


So no, Theoretically, you are incorrect.


it would probably take a piss and dump too.


Posted by exstasie on Aug-18-2008 18:29:

quote:
Originally posted by StereoPrincess
no no. she said that even theoretically the horse could not do it without the rider. it's a horse, lol.


fine..how about technically? lol

I'm sure we could 'technically' genetically engineer a horse that could jump 10 feet in the air lol....no?


The tallest dude was somehow 8 feet 5 inches....anything is possible!


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 18:30:

or kick someone in the head.


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 18:31:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
fine..how about technically? lol

I'm sure we could 'technically' genetically engineer a horse that could jump 10 feet in the air lol....no?


The tallest dude was somehow 8 feet 5 inches....anything is possible!



again, it would have to be engineered into having the mind of a human to do the jumps in sequence and under a certain time limit. and not be shit scared of the jumps.


Posted by MKpacha on Aug-18-2008 18:32:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
fine..how about technically? lol

I'm sure we could 'technically' genetically engineer a horse that could jump 10 feet in the air lol....no?


The tallest dude was somehow 8 feet 5 inches....anything is possible!





Technically, a horse is not physically capable of such heights... why don't you stop arguing about something you have no clue about.


world record


Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-18-2008 18:38:

i am glad i learned something more about horse riding today.

those jumps are crazy big.


Pages (18): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.