TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- When will the obsession with "analog" stop?
Pages (12): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12]
Can anyone recommend a MIC that will pair up with my Roland JD XA? The retailer told me it came with one, I predicted it would not, and sure enough...
Only want to spend about �100.
I suppose a gooseneck would be convenient but it does not have to be. The synth provide phantom power.
The small JD Xi version comes with it's own MIC, but Roland said that MIC did not work well with the bigger synth.
A mate recommends Audio Technica but their �100 ish MIC says it's aimed at stage users, so I'm not too sure of it.
BTW I've spent a good few hours making some lush plucks in case anyone wants the soundbank for them, but I've not yet used them in any productions. They truly are lovely though, just make me want to sit and play all night long without opening the DAW.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Richard Butler Can anyone recommend a MIC that will pair up with my Roland JD XA? The retailer told me it came with one, I predicted it would not, and sure enough... Only want to spend about �100. I suppose a gooseneck would be convenient but it does not have to be. The synth provide phantom power. The small JD Xi version comes with it's own MIC, but Roland said that MIC did not work well with the bigger synth. A mate recommends Audio Technica but their �100 ish MIC says it's aimed at stage users, so I'm not too sure of it. BTW I've spent a good few hours making some lush plucks in case anyone wants the soundbank for them, but I've not yet used them in any productions. They truly are lovely though, just make me want to sit and play all night long without opening the DAW. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tehlord Just get anything if it's just for vocoding use. A Behringer XM8500 for example. I have one and it's great. About �20 too. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Richard Butler which they tell me is long enough. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tehlord Sn1gger |
I know you adjust bought the Roland but just in case (and if anyone else needs) a really great mic for under a ton is the Audio Technical At2020. I've produced countless hours of radio interviews with them age they're really great little mics and can be used for both vox and strung instruments, even as overheads or rooms.
The Roland gooseneck is ultra quiet for vocoder work, useless. They sent me a discontinued headset mic which is much better.
Here's my analog noodling on it today, I do think this thing has a sound.
Excuse the hand noodling, and fumble fingering
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Richard Butler The Roland gooseneck is ultra quiet for vocoder work, useless. They sent me a discontinued headset mic which is much better. Here's my analog noodling on it today, I do think this thing has a sound. Excuse the hand noodling, and fumble fingering |
Cheers I'm surprised you like it as I just slapped it down all fumbly fingered
QUESTION
Ive redone a track with a nice analogue bass but I cant get Cypher (dcam synth in effect mode as an insert), to remain on. I have the keys to HOLD but of course when I export the track the Cypher forgets it's been keyed. Im at a loss.
Im making this track with only the Roland JD XA. I put it up as I've had good feedback about the demos for this.
It's a bit compressed, I'll ease off on this shortly so as the synths can breath
The drums I programmed in Xfer Nerve.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Richard Butler Im making this track with only the Roland JD XA. I put it up as I've had good feedback about the demos for this. It's a bit compressed, I'll ease off on this shortly so as the synths can breath The drums I programmed in Xfer Nerve. |
So, it's 2017 and the analog obsession is finally gone, right?!
Lol, it's probably worse than ever. The best bit is you've now got kids who truly don't know the difference (on a multitude of levels) trying to lecture about the wonders of analogue, something that was reserved for cantankerous farts on GS.
A teacer back in Audio Engineering school said to me (and bear in mind this was 15 years ago) , that everything goes in cycles. Then, he was seeing things from the 70's and 80's being recycled, so does that now mean we're recycling the recycled stuff 
I still have a box of analog that I sprinkle on all my tracks.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cryophonik So, it's 2017 and the analog obsession is finally gone, right?! |

There's various levels of analog along the signal chain.
Analog synths, analog summing / mixing or even analog processing..
In my opinion, there are definitely some sonic benefits from analog summing - exporting individual ITB tracks and/or groups out to tube/value circuitry that imparts 'imperfections' to them i.e. warmth
This can be interpreted as rounder transients, smoother hi-end and a marginally better stereo representation.
However, analog-modeled plugins can sound extremely close to real analog esp. the UAD stuff.
So, whether the (subjective) sonic benefits of real analog over analog-modeled plugins, justify their price-tag is another issue altogether.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.