TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- America's Debt = "We're Screwed!"
Pages (16): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 »


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Apr-01-2009 00:55:

quote:
Originally posted by liquid solja
Ron Paul was the only one who had a clue or at least was the only one who really cared.


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 02:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Groundhog Boy




quote:
January 31 & February 2, 2000

An excerpt from:
A Republic, If You Can Keep It

------------

Statement of
HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS

------------


Although many claim the 1990s have been great economic years, Federal Reserve board action of the past decade has caused problems yet to manifest themselves. The inevitable correction will come as the new century begins and is likely to be quite serious.

The stage has been set. Rampant monetary growth has led to historic high asset inflation, massive speculation, over-capacity, malinvestment, excessive debt, negative savings rate, and a current account deficit of huge proportions. These conditions dictate a painful adjustment, something that would have never occurred under a gold standard. The special benefits of foreigners taking our inflated dollars for low-priced goods and then loaning them back to us will eventually end. The dollar must fall, interest rates must rise, price inflation will accelerate, the financial asset bubble will burst, and a dangerous downturn in the economy will follow. There are many reasons to believe the economic slowdown will be worldwide since the dollar is the reserve currency of the world. An illusion about our dollar's value has allowed us to prop up Europe and Japan in this past decade during a period of weak growth for them, but when reality sets in, economic conditions will deteriorate. Greater computer speed, which has helped to stimulate the boom of the 1990s, will work in the opposite direction as all the speculative positions unwind, and that includes the tens of trillion of dollars in derivatives. There was a good reason the Federal Reserve rushed in to rescue Long-Term Capital Management with a multi-billion dollar bailout. It was unadulterated fear that the big correction was about to begin. Up until now, feeding the credit bubble with even more credit has worked and is the only tool they have to fight the business cycle, but eventually control will be lost.

A paper money system is dangerous economically and not constitutionally authorized. It's also immoral for government to "counterfeit" money, which dilutes the value of the currency and steals value from those who hold the currency and those who did not necessarily benefit from its early circulation. Not everyone benefits from the largesse of government spending programs or a systematic debasement of the currency. The middle class, those not on welfare and not in the military industrial complex, suffer the most from rising prices and job losses in the correction phase of the business cycle. Congress must someday restore sound money to America. It's mandated in the Constitution; it's economically sound to do so; and it's morally right to guarantee a standard of value for the money. Our oath of office obligates all Members of Congress to pay attention to this and participate in this needed reform.


http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/c...00/cr020200.htm


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 03:01:

quote:

The dollar must fall, interest rates must rise, price inflation will accelerate, the financial asset bubble will burst, and a dangerous downturn in the economy will follow.


except the dollar isn't falling, interest rates aren't rising, and we've got price DEFLATION.

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you don't understand economics, you don't understand how the fed works, you don't understand the causes of the financial crisis.

and you most certainly don't understand how to fix it all.


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 03:13:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
except the dollar isn't falling, interest rates aren't rising, and we've got price DEFLATION.


I sometimes wonder whether or not you even live on the same planet as me, PKC.

Here's a good video that you might want to watch:


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 03:15:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
I sometimes wonder whether or not you even live on the same planet as me, PKC.


i think its fairly obvious nobody lives on the same planet as you.

i cant watch videos at work, sorry. and given the standard of most of the videos you post, i cant say im too worried about it.


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Apr-01-2009 03:20:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
I sometimes wonder whether or not you even live on the same planet as me, PKC.

Here's a good video that you might want to watch:


Have you bothered to look at currency rates?

I just want to bang my head against a wall with the logical disconnects some of you will go through to try to prove your point.

You can be summed up simply as "Ron Paul & Gold Standard, Good!! Fed Reserve, Bad!!"


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 03:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Groundhog Boy
Have you bothered to look at currency rates?

I just want to bang my head against a wall with the logical disconnects some of you will go through to try to prove your point.

You can be summed up simply as "Ron Paul & Gold Standard, Good!! Fed Reserve, Bad!!"


You mean comparing the US dollar to other currencies (as in exchange rates?)

If you haven't noticed, everything is down right now so that's like comparing the air pressure in two flat tires.

I definitely wouldn't call being nearly 100% right about this market disconnected. I would call it having done an overabundance of due diligence, though.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 04:02:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
I definitely wouldn't call being nearly 100% right about this market disconnected. I would call it having done an overabundance of due diligence, though.


quote:

Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalised, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism"

Karl Marx, Das Kapital, 1867


therefore communism is the answer!


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 04:07:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
therefore communism is the answer!


Too bad it's a fake quote that doesn't even appear in Das Kapital. lol

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/9080/


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 04:20:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
Too bad it's a fake quote that doesn't even appear in Das Kapital. lol

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/...iewthread/9080/


argh, dammit


Posted by Capitalizt on Apr-01-2009 04:37:

nice try pk


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 04:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
nice try pk


yeah, a friend sent that to me in an email and i didn't bother to check it disappointing, coz marx is the man!


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 04:40:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
argh, dammit


I still give you an A for effort, though. lol


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Apr-01-2009 04:40:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
You mean comparing the US dollar to other currencies (as in exchange rates?)

If you haven't noticed, everything is down right now so that's like comparing the air pressure in two flat tires.

I definitely wouldn't call being nearly 100% right about this market disconnected. I would call it having done an overabundance of due diligence, though.

I'd rather have the tire that's partially inflated vs. the completely flat one that is most other currencies.

And everyone's right about the market at some point. I mean, I can say that the market will go up, and eventually it will, so I'll be right. It gets especially easy when you've witnessed a huge trend because it'll eventually end. I've watched Peter Schiff and Jim Rogers make comments that were bullish on commodities that have been completely off the mark in the past 6 months. Schiff's also been wrong on currencies, on the value of the dollar, inflation, etc. Do I think inflation will occur? Sure, at some point, but if I'd have bought commodities to guard against it 6 months ago, I'd have been slaughtered.


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 04:43:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yeah, a friend sent that to me in an email and i didn't bother to check it disappointing, coz marx is the man!


We all have our own opinions.

I just think it's funny that his theories have never successfully worked in the real world and yet he still has so many followers or adherents.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 04:44:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
We all have our own opinions.

I just think it's funny that his theories have never successfully worked in the real world and yet he still has so many followers or adherents.


i know of hardly any marxists. Just because his solutions are fanciful doesn't mean his analyses aren't of use. Not to mention his huge influence on sociology.


Posted by Capitalizt on Apr-01-2009 04:49:

Marx should be required for study solely based on the amount of damage he has done to the world.


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 05:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Groundhog Boy
I'd rather have the tire that's partially inflated vs. the completely flat one that is most other currencies.

And everyone's right about the market at some point. I mean, I can say that the market will go up, and eventually it will, so I'll be right. It gets especially easy when you've witnessed a huge trend because it'll eventually end. I've watched Peter Schiff and Jim Rogers make comments that were bullish on commodities that have been completely off the mark in the past 6 months. Schiff's also been wrong on currencies, on the value of the dollar, inflation, etc. Do I think inflation will occur? Sure, at some point, but if I'd have bought commodities to guard against it 6 months ago, I'd have been slaughtered.


You're right, but he vehemently called it and gave numerous reasons why the bubble was going to burst. I thought it was a no brainer at the time but for some reason few people wanted to listen.

Historically speaking, though, gold is one of the few things that's retained it's intrinsic value and that's simply for the fact that it doesn't degrade over time, it can't be copied or counterfeited (or printed up in a press), there's only a finite amount of it, and it can easily be measured for weight and purity.

I'd be willing to bet my left testicle that we're going to see major inflation but I do know that it takes some time. The distributionary effect of inflation is something which Richard Cantillon first propounded upon and today it's aptly called the "Cantillon effects" in memory of him.

As much as you guys like to rag on Ron Paul for following the Austrian School of Economics, he sure does seem to know his history.

From his book:

quote:
"All right, some may say, prices may indeed rise, but so do wages and salaries, and therefore inflation causes no real problems on net. This misconception overlooks one of the most insidious and immoral effects of inflation: its redistribution of wealth from the poor and middle class to the politically well connected. The price increases that take place as a result of inflation do not occur all at once and to the same degree. Those who receive the new money first receive it before the prices have yet risen. They enjoy a windfall. Meanwhile, as they spend the new money, and the next wave of recipients spend it, and so on, prices begin to rise throughout the economy—well before the new money has trickled down to most people. The average person is now paying higher prices while still earning his old income, which has not yet been adjusted to account for the higher money supply. By the time the new money has made its way throughout the economy, average people have all this time been paying higher prices, and only now can begin to break even. The enrichment of the politically well connected—In other words those who get the newly created money first: government contractors, big banks and the like—comes at the direct expense of everyone else. These are known as the distribution effects, or Cantillon effects, of inflation, after economist Richard Cantillon. The average person is silently robbed through this invisible means and usually doesn’t’ understand what exactly is happening to him. And almost no one in the political establishment has an incentive to tell him."

"When the value of Americans’ savings is deliberately eroded through inflation, which is a tax, albeit a hidden one. I call it the inflation tax, a tax that is all the more insidious for being so underhanded: most Americans have no idea what causes it or why their standard of living is going down. Meanwhile, government and its favored constituencies receive their ill-gotten loot. The racket is safe as long as no one figures out what is going on."

- Ron Paul, The Revolution: A Manifesto pp 143-144


The fact that we're printing (or at least adding) trillions upon trillions of dollars to the current pool of money is going to bite us in the asses. It doesn't matter whether we can feel it's effects right now or not, IT IS INFLATION and it is going to come back to us with dire consequences.


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 05:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Marx should be required for study solely based on the amount of damage he has done to the world.


I actually considered reading Hitler's Mein Kampf for that very same reason but quickly thought better of it.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-01-2009 05:59:

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
Historically speaking, though, gold is one of the few things that's retained it's intrinsic value


lol. gold has no intrinsic value. its value is determined by what someone is willing to pay for it. it follows supply-demand rules like any other commodity.

the gold standard has a recessionary bias, was instrumental in the perpetuation of the great depression, and has absolutely NO support by modern economists, outside the austrian school (but they're not real economists anyway so who cares?)

quote:
Originally posted by gallantrybot
I just think it's funny that his theories have never successfully worked in the real world and yet he still has so many followers or adherents.


yet you're still following the gold standard which was tried and failed. why is that?


Posted by Groundhog Boy on Apr-01-2009 06:10:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol. gold has no intrinsic value.

THANK YOU!!!

It's one of the last commodities that I'd want to realistically invest in.

What will fail if gold prices decline? Its only basis is in historical value when people liked pretty, shiny things. At this point in time, I'd be more inclined to invest in storable energy sources, like oil, but it takes up too much space compared with an equivalent value of gold.


Posted by Krypton on Apr-01-2009 06:17:

In a complete apocolyptic collapse of economy/society, gold is useless. Food, water, shelter, and energy is what would be demanded.


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 06:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
In a complete apocolyptic collapse of economy/society, gold is useless. Food, water, shelter, and energy is what would be demanded.


As a store of wealth gold and silver still reigns supreme but yes I do agree, however, that basic necessities are what will matter the most immediately following a collapse.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=su...onomic+collapse

I had some Russian guy send me this video on YouTube a couple of months back which he made after his experience in the early 1990's. It's pretty well done and he even drew charts showing what percentages of all assets (from cash to consumer goods) to keep for different scenarios.

There are plenty of others on there as well:

http://www.youtube.com/results?sear...onomic+collapse


Posted by Capitalizt on Apr-01-2009 07:16:

Man, these debates have worn me out over the past few days.. I'm just going to post one final thing for all my economic aficionados in PDD before I let trancer take over for a while.

I read this book in college back in 2000 and just found it FREE online from scribd. It's a fantastic resource with plenty of "meat and potatoes" to sink your teeth into if you want to learn about the great depression and the decade preceding it. There are no esoteric terms or crazy formulas...just hard historical data and trenchant analysis on the subject. Try to stick with it..It's a surprisingly easy read despite the length.

America's Great Depression, by Murray Rothbard America's Great Depression, by Murray Rothbard Ludwig von Mises Institute Murray N. Rothbard's America's Great Depression is a staple of modern economic literature and crucial for understanding a pivotal event in American and world history. The Mises Institute edition features, along with a new introduction by historian Paul Johnson, top-quality paper and bindings, in line with the standard set by The Scholars Edition of Human Action. Since it first appeared in 1963, it has been the definitive treatment of the causes of the depression. The book remains canonical today because the debate is still very alive.

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Business eBooks depression great depression


Posted by gallantrybot on Apr-01-2009 07:19:

Thanks for posting that!! I'm actually going to download it because I have an old laptop that I've converted into an e-reader


Pages (16): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.