TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Homosexual Matrimony
Pages (16): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 »

quote:

Originally posted by boris_the_bear why not find a normal adequate heterosexual couple for them?

Do you have any idea how many children are in the system waiting to be adopted in the U.S. alone? Not to mention all the children from other countries in addition?

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/...waiting2006.htm

Children in Public Foster Care Waiting to be Adopted 2006 - 126,967

That number is consistent too. An astounding number of children are left to rot in the system. Being with two loving individuals in a home where they will be given attention and a place to feel like they belong, whether it be 2 men, 2 women, or a man and a woman, is WAY WAY better than leaving them in foster care.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On Oh man, you're totally right. Whatever happens, those kids are obviously much better off in foster homes with 12 other children while their [mostly] heterosexual rat-fuck cracker "parents" stay home all day on the government's dime, having their way with them behind closed doors.

As though homosexuals are incapable of being inadequate parents.

I hate this notion that homosexual parents automatically equals a swell childhood.

quote:

Originally posted by R.j. As though homosexuals are incapable of being inadequate parents. I hate this notion that homosexual parents automatically equals a swell childhood.

Apparently up-bringing from heterosexual parents didn't help you appreciate the weak points of a straw-man logical fallacy.

quote:

Originally posted by R.j. As though homosexuals are incapable of being inadequate parents. I hate this notion that homosexual parents automatically equals a swell childhood.

Nobody's claimed that. Foster parents are unproven. There are good ones and bad ones, and their sexual orientation isn't important. However, if a child is in fostercare, their biological parents have already proven to be unsuitable. It really isn't a difficult concept to grasp.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker Apparently up-bringing from heterosexual parents didn't help you appreciate the weak points of a straw-man logical fallacy.

I know exactly what a strawman argument is.

Apparently being against homosexual marriage = a closet case, an idiot.

quote:

Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Nobody's claimed that. Foster parents are unproven. There are good ones and bad ones, and their sexual orientation isn't important. However, if a child is in fostercare, their biological parents have already proven to be unsuitable. It really isn't a difficult concept to grasp.

Yeah. Nobody's claimed that. But it's more than obvious that that's what they're implying.

Not that I have a problem with a child being raised by homosexual parents, as I already stated that in my earlier posts.

quote:

Originally posted by R.j. Yeah. Nobody's claimed that. But it's more than obvious that that's what they're implying. Not that I have a problem with a child being raised by homosexual parents, as I already stated that in my earlier posts.

I agree with SYSTEM-J here... as long as the parents are stable and put the child first, there should be no problems.

quote:

Originally posted by R.j. Yeah. Nobody's claimed that. But it's more than obvious that that's what they're implying.

No they aren't. Read the context of the thing you're quoting. Hal wasn't even rebuking the notion that homosexuals could be bad parents. He was rebuking the notion that a kid being picked on at school for having gay foster parents is worse than leaving them in an orphanage.

quote:

Originally posted by SYSTEM-J No they aren't. Read the context of the thing you're quoting. Hal wasn't even rebuking the notion that homosexuals could be bad parents. He was rebuking the notion that a kid being picked on at school for having gay foster parents is worse than leaving them in an orphanage.

Okay, I'll concede to that.

quote:

Originally posted by ivofivo

meh. typical front cover for a men's magazine. never liked those

quote:

Originally posted by boris_the_bear meh. typical front cover for a men's magazine. never liked those

You see that? Boris is gay!! FAG!


Take note, everyone.

great. i'm calling the orphanage now!

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On Oh man, you're totally right. Whatever happens, those kids are obviously much better off in foster homes with 12 other children while their [mostly] heterosexual rat-fuck cracker "parents" stay home all day on the government's dime, having their way with them behind closed doors.

Its funny up until the day I calculated just how many of these leeches I support each year with my taxes. Yes that's right, we do contribute to society... in some cases more than others

Hey guys, what are your opinions on Metrosexuals being able to adopt?

1)To be gay is a luxury and not a necessity. Luxuries are irrelevant and in most cases unneeded.


2)If you are gay, and flare up when somebody opposes your ways, it would be almost impossible for you to prove your point. Basic psychology.


3)I don't see gay marriage as a legit practice to the society, because it filters many aspects of the society, such as; adoption, religion, and basically the plan of all breathing living organisms. (most).

quote:

Originally posted by ivofivo 1)To be gay is a luxury and not a necessity. Luxuries are irrelevant and in most cases unneeded. 2)If you are gay, and flare up when somebody opposes your ways, it would be almost impossible for you to prove your point. Basic psychology. 3)I don't see gay marriage as a legit practice to the society, because it filters many aspects of the society, such as; adoption, religion, and basically the plan of all breathing living organisms. (most).

Except you assume your premises are based in truth, when they are not, because truth is not absolute. So basically, you're wrong.

quote:

Originally posted by jennypie Except you assume your premises are based in truth, when they are not, because truth is not absolute. So basically, you're wrong.

"because truth is not absolute"- jp

And I guess the support of gays is a white lie.

What the fuck does that even mean?

quote:

Originally posted by jennypie What the fuck does that even mean?

EXACTLY.

WTF?!

FFS there is more to life than just pro-creating!

This is what makes us different from animals!!

All this "homo is unnecessary, unnatural" crap comes from us thinking the only purpose is to keep the human race going.

And even if it is down to that, there is more to be done than just producing children.

quote:

Originally posted by jennypie What the fuck does that even mean?

i think that if two dudes have a love thang for each other and wantt o get married and adopt kids, they should be able to.

quote:

Originally posted by tubularbills i think that if two dudes have a love thang for each other and wantt o get married and adopt kids, they should be able to.

It looks like your gonna have more job security thanks to the pentagon. Congrats!

quote:

Originally posted by jonSun It looks like your gonna have more job security thanks to the pentagon. Congrats!

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.