TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?
Pages (162): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 [150] 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »


Posted by yukii on Apr-30-2009 03:28:

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
LOL, honest last administration? Never use honest in the same sentence with the last administration if you want to be taken seriously.

The problem is you and some others place these war criminals on too high of a peddle stool when you should be dissecting them. Especially given that nothing adds up in their official conspiracy theory regarding 9/11.

I never lied, omitted and covered up anything but they obviously did.


Closed doors and would not testify alone in front of the commissioners? Sure they were telling the truth.


FFS!! I don't get you!!!

UGHGDSLkfjlkdfjff... the frustration.

You believe just because the administration lied about things here and there (I know they lied about *SERIOUS* things) but fucking seriously now that means that they had a nice tea party and decided they wanted to have a conspiracy party on 9/11?!?!

It's like, you believe they can't do one damn thing 'right' just because they did something like lie about WMD. Not to mention I know you wanted to start a thread on how swine flu is ANOTHER conspiracy.

But honestly, if this is your ideology, then I recommend for you to go see a physician because you might have one of those mental illnesses where you think they're out to get you.

FUCK the last administration, war criminals, Cheney, Bush, EVERYONE.
I don't care about them and I'm not defending them but seriously, I put war criminals on a peddle stool? You have to be kidding me..


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 03:33:

Tell me how 9/11 was not serious then. Did you bother to watch what the same people from the USA think about the 9/11 commission report in that last video or are you going to use the same excuse as the trolls and sheep around here?

Let me guess.

Nope.


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 03:34:

quote:
It's like, you believe they can't do one damn thing 'right' just because they did something like lie about WMD. Not to mention I know you wanted to start a thread on how swine flu is ANOTHER conspiracy.


Actually I have to ask WTF are you exactly on about here?


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 03:40:

quote:
But honestly, if this is your ideology, then I recommend for you to go see a physician because you might have one of those mental illnesses where you think they're out to get you.


Nobody is out to get me, I feel very safe exactly where I am. If anything I feel more secure then most of the posters in this thread. I am just pointing out the obvious and I realize I will be ridiculed by the same individuals and new people like you who are not informed making invalid assumptions. If I cared what anyone thought I would have stopped a long time ago.

I am here to debate and posting valid information for my side and all I see is name calling from the minority.


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 03:45:

quote:
And did you just make fun of me for reading books? Seriously? Low blow, man. You know I'm sensitive about my inability to keep up with the latest youtube videos.


Yes I am making fun of you, it's the internet. Live with it or go back to reading more books. Besides they will keep you from hurting your head from things you cannot really handle. Or is that why you read books in the first place?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-30-2009 04:01:

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
without people like us there would be no debate


Denialism: the employment of rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of argument or legitimate debate, when in actuality there is none. These false arguments are used when one has few or no facts to support one's viewpoint against a scientific consensus or against overwhelming evidence to the contrary. They are effective in distracting from actual useful debate using emotionally appealing, but ultimately empty and illogical assertions.

Examples of common topics in which Denialists employ their tactics include: Creationism/Intelligent Design, Global Warming Denialism, Holocaust Denial, HIV/AIDS Denialism, 9/11 conspiracies, tobacco carcinogenecity denialism (the first organized corporate campaign), anti-vaccination/mercury autism denialism and anti-animal testing/animal rights extremist denialism. Denialism spans the ideological spectrum, and is about tactics rather than politics or partisanship.

We believe there are five simple guidelines for identifying denialist arguments. Most denialist arguments will incorporate more than one of the following tactics: Conspiracy, Selectivity, False Experts, Impossible Expectations/Moving Goalposts, and Argument from Metaphor/violations of informal logic.

you keep going cretinrot!!


Posted by yukii on Apr-30-2009 04:08:

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Nobody is out to get me, I feel very safe exactly where I am. If anything I feel more secure then most of the posters in this thread. I am just pointing out the obvious and I realize I will be ridiculed by the same individuals and new people like you who are not informed making invalid assumptions. If I cared what anyone thought I would have stopped a long time ago.

I am here to debate and posting valid information for my side and all I see is name calling from the minority.


I'm also pointing out the obvious.. I'm not trying to ridicule you sorry if you get that impression, but I just don't see how you can believe in these kind of absurdities.. and now I'm 'new, not well informed, making invalid assumptions'?

Sorry, but in my eyes- you are the one that is not well informed making invalid assumptions buddy.


Posted by Krypton on Apr-30-2009 04:10:

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
who are not informed making invalid assumptions. If I cared what anyone thought I would have stopped a long time ago.


Yea, uh huh, then you wouldn't have said this...

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
No it's what an overwhelming amount of people around the world believe they should be tried for.

Just another battle in where you are in the minority and cannot think outside the box for a moment.


To which would equate to...

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Argumentum Ad Populum

An argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people"), in logic, is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges that "If many believe so, it is so."


So in actuality, you do care what other people think, and use your perception of public opinion to fallaciously argue an invalid point. It is you who is "not informed making invalid assumptions." Way to go champ...


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Apr-30-2009 07:24:

loose change forums:

Total Members: 1,115

yep, taking the world by storm the truth movement is!


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Apr-30-2009 12:13:

World Population 6,776,729,820
12:09 GMT (EST+5) Apr 30, 2009

1115/6776729820 = .0000001645

or .00001645% of the world population.

That certainly sounds like a mass movement to me. We're definitely in the minority on the "government didn't commit 9/11" spectrum. I think we should just take it for granted that culorut has evidence of that too.


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:10:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
loose change forums:

Total Members: 1,115

yep, taking the world by storm the truth movement is!




Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (culorut vs PKC)


Yes 210 59.15%
No 145 40.85%


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:15:

Sorry you guys are a little late to post fraudulent numbers in this thread. As of 2006 these were the results from Zogby and this was just in America alone, outside of the USA even more people do not believe the bullshit official story.

Less than half of Americans satisfied with 9/11 investigations

According to a new Zogby poll, less than half of Americans are convinced that that the events of September 11 have been thoroughly investigated, RAW STORY has learned.

http://www.911truth.org/page.php?page=zogby_2006

In the telephone survey of 1200 individuals, just 47% agreed that "the 9/11 attacks were thoroughly investigated and that any speculation about US government involvement is nonsense." Almost as many, 45%, indicated they were more likely to agree "that so many unanswered questions about 9/11 remain that Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success."

The poll is the first survey that has attempted to gauge the level of Americans' doubts about 9/11 and was carried out for the "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future" conference to be held in Chicago in June.

Not surprisingly, Republicans as a group were the most supportive of existing investigations, with 70% expressing their satisfaction -- about the same percentage that has expressed approval of Bush's performance in recent polls. Sixty-four percent of those earning over $75,000 were also skeptical of doubts about 9/11. The groups most likely to want the attacks re-investigated were Hispanics at 67% and African-Americans at 64%.

Other groups also skewed one way or another, but with the majority position generally not above 58%. Overall, the breakdown on the question closely followed the usual political divisions in the country: Republicans vs. Democrats and independents, whites vs. minorities, the wealthier and better-educated vs. the poorer and less educated, people over fifty vs. those under fifty, men vs. women.

This rough balance in opinions is itself a striking finding. It suggests that doubts about the officials accounts of 9/11, far from representing an extreme fringe position, have become a standard component of anti-establishment attitudes.

When asked specificially if they thought there had been a government coverup of evidence that contradicts the official story, the results were again not far from an even split, with 48% rejecting the idea of a deliberate coverup and 42% supporting it. Belief in a coverup was the majority position among Democrats, 18-29 year olds, and a few other groups.

In an attempt to focus more specifically on the attitudes of those who were best informed about the events of 9/11, the poll asked its responders if they were aware of WTC Building 7, whose collapse on September 11 for no obvious reason was not investigated by the 9/11 Commission. Only 52% answered that they were aware of the collapse of Building 7, but out of that subgroup, 73% believed it should have been investigated.

On a related topic, those polled were asked if they felt the Bush Administration had exploited the September 11th attacks to justify the invasion of Iraq or if Bush had been right to go into Iraq because Saddam Hussein supported terrorism. Here the country was divided exactly, 44% to 44%, with the answers following party lines more closely than those to the 9/11 questions. Among Republicans, 72% felt the invasion was appropriate, while among Democrats 69% felt it was not.

A final question asked about the media's performance regarding 9/11, including coverage of victims' families, unanswered questions, theories that challenged the official account, and how the attacks were investigated. A majority of 55% rated the media as only fair or poor, while only 33% rated it as good.

Surprisingly, the groups most likely to rate the media positively tended to be those that were also most skeptical about official accounts of 9/11, including African-Americans, progressives, and those with lower incomes. The media were rated poorly by roughly 60% of Republicans, conservatives, and the more affluent and better educated. Libertarians and extreme conservatives, at 74% and 67% respectively, were the most negative of all.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/L...sfied_0523.html


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
World Population 6,776,729,820
12:09 GMT (EST+5) Apr 30, 2009

1115/6776729820 = .0000001645

or .00001645% of the world population.

That certainly sounds like a mass movement to me. We're definitely in the minority on the "government didn't commit 9/11" spectrum. I think we should just take it for granted that culorut has evidence of that too.


Now I know why you still have to be in school. Higher educated?


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:23:

quote:
Originally posted by yukii
I'm also pointing out the obvious.. I'm not trying to ridicule you sorry if you get that impression, but I just don't see how you can believe in these kind of absurdities.. and now I'm 'new, not well informed, making invalid assumptions'?


I am pointing out the obvious, have you bothered to look at the video which aired on C-span of what your own people think of the bullshit 9/11 commission report yet? Guess not, keep making assumptions.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Apr-30-2009 15:26:

Fight the good fight, culorut. I'm certain you're breaking them. The truth army shall march on the white house and hold all of those responsible for this disgusting debacle. Freedom shall reign once more, et cetera.


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Yea, uh huh, then you wouldn't have said this...



To which would equate to...



So in actuality, you do care what other people think, and use your perception of public opinion to fallaciously argue an invalid point. It is you who is "not informed making invalid assumptions." Way to go champ...


You still have not answered why you think there should be another 9/11 commission. Stop being a coward and answer the question, it is so blatantly obvious it was setup from both sides and Cheney/Bush getting the last laugh again.


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Fight the good fight, culorut. I'm certain you're breaking them. The truth army shall march on the white house and hold all of those responsible for this disgusting debacle. Freedom shall reign once more, et cetera.


And I will light up a big fat cigar up if that day ever comes. For now I will stick to my guns keeping the sheeple and trolls entertained for things they will never understand.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Apr-30-2009 15:32:

Hey, culorut. You have access to so much truth... but what do you plan to do with it all though?


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:37:

I have a feeling somebody lit up a big fat cigar already.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Apr-30-2009 15:46:

You've got that right!

But really, you know the truth of what happened - don't you think it's just as bad to sit by idly and let them keep getting away with it though? I mean, if we want change - real change for a change - it's in the hands of the people; people just like you and I. Do you see what I'm saying?


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 15:48:

quote:
Hey, culorut. You have access to so much truth... but what do you plan to do with it all though?


But to answer the question I really could do a few things. Keep it to myself, express my opinion and debate it like in here or just be somewhere in the middle.

Do I judge you and others based on what you post in this forum? Nope.

I have no problem though biting back to the usual suspects who not only attack me but many others in this same forum, so I guess they will just to live with it, that's the internet for you and life in general.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Apr-30-2009 15:50:

It's tough, isn't it? People don't want to listen to the truth when it's so ugly and staring them right in the face. You said it though - that's life.

There are other methods for getting them to listen though...


Posted by culorut on Apr-30-2009 16:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
You've got that right!

But really, you know the truth of what happened - don't you think it's just as bad to sit by idly and let them keep getting away with it though? I mean, if we want change - real change for a change - it's in the hands of the people; people just like you and I. Do you see what I'm saying?


I am not exactly sitting by idly, talking about it in a civil manner with those who do the same is good enough. I do not expect to change or save the world but it would be a boring fukin place if everyone thought like KFC and Kryptoshit at least in this forum.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Apr-30-2009 16:07:

So then you admit that you're just in it for entertainment?

Civil talk is all well and good, but it does not bring justice to those responsible for these horrendous dealings.

You're not the freedom fighter I thought that you were. You don't really want anything to change at all.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Apr-30-2009 16:41:

sorry, I've not been paying attention to this thread... are there still idiots thinking this was an inside job?


Pages (162): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 [150] 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.