Chicago panoramas and other shots (LOTS)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Chicago panoramas and other shots (LOTS)
Pages (21): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 »

Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-01-2009 05:31:

quote:
Originally posted by psymon.d
Awesome spider shot Sushi. I'm a fan of those micro-images...saw a bumblebee one a while ago, was quality..

I love his little moustache thing. You can't see it in the shot, but he's got another 4+ eyes on the back of his head.

I'm too scared to get that close to bees though. I'm bigtime allergic

Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-01-2009 05:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
dual DIGIC IV's. nuff said. that shit is gonna be HANDLING the noise.

Going back to this post: Is that what creates/lessens noise? The processors? Or is it the sensor itself? Or a combo of both?

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 05:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
Going back to this post: Is that what creates/lessens noise? The processors? Or is it the sensor itself? Or a combo of both?

It should be a combination of both.

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 07:28:

^^yeah -

quote:
You can also specify which point selection mode (and which point or zone), you want the camera to jump to, depending on the orientation of the camera.

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 07:38:

God damn. And the price is so fucking affordable compared to the 5d.

Posted by Joss Weatherby on Sep-01-2009 07:42:

LOL I almost want to get that as my EF-S body, but I don't shoot nearly enough to justify getting a new body right now...

Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-01-2009 07:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
LOL I almost want to get that as my EF-S body, but I don't shoot nearly enough to justify getting a new body right now...

I don't think I've seen a shot from you since the beginning of your summer. You slack bastard!

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 07:50:

Gizmodo is saying its $1899.

http://gizmodo.com/5349829/canon-7d...-video-for-1900

which one is it?

Posted by Joss Weatherby on Sep-01-2009 07:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
I don't think I've seen a shot from you since the beginning of your summer. You slack bastard!

I have taken a number of photos over the summer. The main thing stopping me from posting them is that its slow as fuck getting them on to my computer. I use Lightroom 2 to transfer and it takes a good hour or so for it to get all the photos on because of the way it does it.

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 08:01:

supposedly the 1899 is with a 28-135 lens. 1699 body only.

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 08:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
I have taken a number of photos over the summer. The main thing stopping me from posting them is that its slow as fuck getting them on to my computer. I use Lightroom 2 to transfer and it takes a good hour or so for it to get all the photos on because of the way it does it.

So don't transfer them this shitty way? Memory card reader ftw

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 08:10:

hey dude just saw your so cal - you doing ok? any evacuation near you?

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 08:35:

Yeah I am pretty far from the fires. They are near Mt. Wilson in LA and I am in Orange County. Which is 45mins south of Downtown LA. http://tinyurl.com/lzckso

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 08:52:

quote:
Originally posted by gehzumteufel
Yeah I am pretty far from the fires. They are near Mt. Wilson in LA and I am in Orange County. Which is 45mins south of Downtown LA. http://tinyurl.com/lzckso

well thats fortunate to hear -

Posted by Sushipunk on Sep-01-2009 09:00:

Posted by Joss Weatherby on Sep-01-2009 14:14:

Yea. I need to experiment. I have a memory card reader, but I was never happy with it, its sort of shoddy.

Citric told me to use one years ago, but I have always been stubborn!

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 15:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Yea. I need to experiment. I have a memory card reader, but I was never happy with it, its sort of shoddy.

Citric told me to use one years ago, but I have always been stubborn!

So get another one. Stop fucking around!

Posted by jdat on Sep-01-2009 15:14:

I'd like a D700

Posted by Joss Weatherby on Sep-01-2009 15:25:

quote:
Originally posted by gehzumteufel
So get another one. Stop fucking around!

So is it you that tells Rose to yell at me for being lazy or vica versa, or is this some conspiracy where you both try and motivate me!

Damn motivators.

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 15:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
So is it you that tells Rose to yell at me for being lazy or vica versa, or is this some conspiracy where you both try and motivate me!

Damn motivators.

lol neither.

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 17:55:

7D review and sample images..

http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_...d=7-10042-10239

Posted by gehzumteufel on Sep-01-2009 18:08:

http://www.amazon.com/Wolverine-Pic...s/dp/B00197MZ1U

Posted by Joss Weatherby on Sep-01-2009 18:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
7D review and sample images..

http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_...d=7-10042-10239

damn.

Posted by Rasidel Slika on Sep-01-2009 18:27:

so uhh... on the Galbraith site I was surprised by the ISO 1600 picture of the dog running - so much noise! but I told myself my eyes were probably playing tricks on me - the image does not look like something created by a brand new next-gen DSLR, in 2009. It looks like something I'd get out of my 5D1.

Posted by Joss Weatherby on Sep-01-2009 18:29:

It is noisy, but at least it is very monochromatic, not a lot of hot pixels, like those annoying purple fucks you see in lower end dSLR cams...

I actually kind of like the noise in that photo from an aesthetic point of view, but yea, even my 5Dmk1 is less noisy at 1600, that looks like a 3200ISO shot.

Pages (21): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 »