TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Site Suggestions
-- Report members sigs that exceed the guidelines in here
Pages (70): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 »

sorted

389

46190

55896
25878

47423

113kb

36212

quote:

Originally posted by nchs09 i thoguht that was the thread number

nchs09 (23996)

Over the limit by 601 bytes.

Unacceptable.

Ok, similar one.

19335



50.541 + 8.07 KB.

One more.

68452



68.05 KB

w00t, one more.

51.079 KB

19858

See..this is the reason why TA is slow. So many over sized siggs.

quote:

8609 50.446 KB

quote:

47248 91.51 KB

Ok, enough for the day.

Ok...today seems to be that day

Clovis86 (33721)



Blatant violation of the siggy size rule at 77.61 KB.

still unedited

54788

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M w00t, one more. 51.079 KB 19858

Firefox says 49.88kb

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M w00t, one more. 51.079 KB 19858

51.079 Bytes on my browser.

49.88 here. Plus the guys nice. leave him alone bitches!

posting the actual sig is kinda lame imo too.... None look as bad as silly little flashing ones

and 49524

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery Firefox says 49.88kb

Not really. Firefox seems to round it off to a lower value when it shows the size in KB.
But, if you check the bytes in the brackets it shows the correct value (51079 bytes). No such problems in IE though. It shows the true size right away.

quote:

Originally posted by Ian 49.88 here. Plus the guys nice. leave him alone bitches! posting the actual sig is kinda lame imo too....

Nice guy or not. Overlimit is overlimit. Don't bitch about it.

Most of the sigs are just over the limit. And Firefox acts kinda funny when showing the size. So, I posted the sigs as well.

quote:

None look as bad as silly little flashing ones

But it is within limits.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M Nice guy or not. Overlimit is overlimit. Don't bitch about it. Most of the sigs are just over the limit. And Firefox acts kinda funny when showing the size. So, I posted the sigs as well. But it is within limits.

i'll take one a tiny bit 'over' (even tho firefox tells me it's ok) over one which gives me a headache

Don't be selfish Ask someone who posts from Nigeria using a dialup connection and he'll prefer it the other way round

66292

88.34 KB

46726

Firefox says 50.42 KB (51625 bytes)

12741

57.34 KB

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M 46726 Firefox says 50.42 KB (51625 bytes)

like... does it really bother you that much? This thread should really be used for those rediiculase sized sigs dont you think?

I think rules are rules. If only ridiculously big sigs need to be reported,

then the sig rules might as well be editied to accomodate larger sigs. But they are not.

Besides, it's fun to report sigs on the fringe ! Its upto the mods and Swamper to decide whether to keep them or not.

The more such sigs are reported, the faster your page will load. Ok, this doesn't make a difference in North America or Europe.

But it certainly makes a difference in other parts of the world where people are not blessed with high speed internet connection.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.