TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Banging Coworkers?
Pages (20): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 »


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 16:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Your foreskin is why they invented clothespins.


what i do is i steal those little pointy caps that go in reusable piknic ketchup bottles. The ring fits wonderfully around the top, and all i have to do is shove the pointy end in the tip to limit leakage.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-27-2011 16:57:

*schplunck*


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 17:04:

you nailed it.

(which incidentally don't try, not only does it hurt, but the discharge can wiggle out through the sides.)


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jan-27-2011 17:15:

quote:
Originally posted by ziptnf
Actually, she supports horrible genital mutilation and should be stoned to death in front of all the insecure, pissed off, nou-ish anteater cheesedicks.



All I know is that I don't need any lube to have a good wank. The economy/efficiency factor right there makes being uncut just that much better.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-27-2011 17:21:

Well nou, most people here have moved beyond simply having a wank to having actual intercourse - with a live human female. Foreskin is pretty much irrelevant at that stage of the game.


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jan-27-2011 17:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
Well nou, most people here have moved beyond simply having a wank to having actual intercourse - with a live human female. Foreskin is pretty much irrelevant at that stage of the game.



I know that was just a joke at my expense and know that you know that masturbation doesn't stop when in a relationship, OR when easy sex is available.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 17:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
Well nou, most people here have moved beyond simply having a wank to having actual intercourse - with a live human female. Foreskin is pretty much irrelevant at that stage of the game.


actually this is not quite true. During intercourse my foreskin will also move up and down over my head at times.

also:it is win for titty fuckin.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-27-2011 17:29:

Jesus fucking christ, shut the fuck up Jay. Let me have my burns, fuck.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 17:30:

i'm just a foreskin activist.


Posted by netroM on Jan-27-2011 17:47:

quote:
Originally posted by wienerschnitzel
I mentioned my son was circumcised and defended the right as parents to make that decision, that is all.

I know.

quote:

and i don't think you can really compare female genital mutilation considering one is most often done in a dirty hut with a rusty blade, sometimes up to the age of 12-14 and removing any nerves that would make sex pleasurable and the other is removing the foreskin, not loping off the head of the penis.

So if female genital mutilation was done in a clean and sterile environment, akin to the one of circumcisions, you would then defend that as well? Since it's the parents' decision?


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jan-27-2011 17:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
Jesus fucking christ, shut the fuck up Jay. Let me have my burns, fuck.


You are just mad because you don't have foreskin OR A FAT COCK.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-27-2011 17:51:

No, I'm really not bad about either of those things.


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jan-27-2011 17:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
No, I'm really not bad about either of those things.


You know you wish you could sprout a giant dick on command.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-27-2011 17:53:

So do you I'm sure.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 17:57:


Posted by jenga on Jan-27-2011 18:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
lots of new vocabulary here. cool pedantic.. i like that



Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jan-27-2011 18:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Miss Pie
So do you I'm sure.



I can. I just look at your sitting on the toilet pic and whamo.


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 18:03:

everything she wants extended remix.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-27-2011 18:04:

quote:
Originally posted by netroM
So if female genital mutilation was done in a clean and sterile environment, akin to the one of circumcisions, you would then defend that as well? Since it's the parents' decision?


Female genital mutilation reduces, if not eliminates, the woman's capacity to enjoy sex. The intellect of your argument is therefore reduced, if not eliminated, entirely.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-27-2011 18:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
You are just mad because you don't have foreskin OR A FAT COCK.


No worries Jenny, you can borrow my foreskin and fat cock whenever you like.
























note: by fat I mean "entirely average and unimpressive"


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 18:09:

i'll lend you mine, but you should probably wear hazmat approved gloves.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-27-2011 18:10:

quote:
Originally posted by netroM
I know.


So if female genital mutilation was done in a clean and sterile environment, akin to the one of circumcisions, you would then defend that as well? Since it's the parents' decision?


I think it's pretty disingenuious to try and put the two forms of circumcision on the same level. Female circumcision generally results in a near total absence of sensation; whereas, most men who have been circumcised report an entirely acceptable level of sensation. Is it less then the sensation felt by uncircumsised men... probably; however, if it's still sufficient as to be pleasurable and these men know nothing else then it's really inconsequential.


Posted by Joss Weatherby on Jan-27-2011 18:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
I think it's pretty disingenuious to try and put the two forms of circumcision on the same level. Female circumcision generally results in a near total absence of sensation; whereas, most men who have been circumcised report an entirely acceptable level of sensation. Is it less then the sensation felt by uncircumsised men... probably; however, if it's still sufficient as to be pleasurable and these men know nothing else then it's really inconsequential.



Thats the same argument I used for why it doesn't matter if all of humanity were to disappear. We'd all be dead, so it wouldn't matter, you wouldn't know the difference and you wouldn't have anyone else knowing the difference!


Posted by Zyklon_Jay on Jan-27-2011 18:19:

hillshire farms


Posted by Moral Hazard on Jan-27-2011 18:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Thats the same argument I used for why it doesn't matter if all of humanity were to disappear. We'd all be dead, so it wouldn't matter, you wouldn't know the difference and you wouldn't have anyone else knowing the difference!


not really the same, as a sudden absence of humanity would have broader effects then just to the now non-existant humans. A better argument would be if cars had never been made with stereos... we'd still be able to drive as necessary but the experience would be somewhat lessend by the absence of auditory entertainment; however, we would be entirely unaware that the experience could be marginally better.


Pages (20): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.