TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- McProgressive
Pages (23): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 »
This is amusing.
So, I have a question. Do the four to the floor mixes of Luke Chable count as McProg? Does Tilt - The World Doesn't Know classify? Benz and MD? If so, I love McProg and will continue to play it regardless of how much hating you people can do.
Hey Ory, about your earlier post. How you want a counter arguement about someshit. It's an opinion, you can not argue an opinion and expect to counter it. I'm sure your are a nice guy out in the real world but a lot of your arguements don't jusify what you stand for, in some cases you contradict yourself.
This thread has gone down the shitter, we are arguing about a completely different issue, i hope you people can realise this and end the pathetic thread.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Camwin Hey Ory, about your earlier post. How you want a counter arguement about someshit. It's an opinion, you can not argue an opinion and expect to counter it. I'm sure your are a nice guy out in the real world but a lot of your arguements don't jusify what you stand for, in some cases you contradict yourself. This thread has gone down the shitter, we are arguing about a completely different issue, i hope you people can realise this and end the pathetic thread. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ory I was talking about the fact that McProg producers go by a formula to create their music. I mean, it's so obvious that their tracks sound so very similar, to me anyway. It doesn't seem like it, to you. EDIT: A counter argument to that would be; "McProg isn't formulaic and unoriginal because..." |
Exactly. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ory EDIT: A counter argument to that would be; "McProg isn't formulaic and unoriginal because..." |
I think that this idea that there is an objective measure of quality music is false and that people say this to justify the common opinions of the groups that they find themselves in. They then come up with the "objective" measures based on what factors they beleive their favorite sound excels in.
This applies no matter the size, age, experiences, knowledge, or expertise of the group.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ory I was talking about the fact that McProg producers go by a formula to create their music. I mean, it's so obvious that their tracks sound so very similar, to me anyway. It doesn't seem like it, to you. EDIT: A counter argument to that would be; "McProg isn't formulaic and unoriginal because..." |
a shame some of you bitches!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Omega_Blue Let's face it. most genres of trance are pretty damn predictable. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by memusa That's why progressive house is different: it has no real pattern, it's just a state of abstract expression (at least true progressive is). |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ory I'd expect someone who was truly mature to either a) Respond to my question. b) Ignore it, and not fuel the fire. Until you can do that, I won't listen to you. |
.
Jesus H Christ - Give it up.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Light The Fuse Jesus H Christ - Give it up. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian^ does that come with a markus schulz coldharbour remix ? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_Foyle lol :P |
shame theres no so much good humour between others
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian^ can't blame me for trying to bring humour into the thread eh shame theres no so much good humour between others |
Atleast this thread has brung some good humour and inspiration. I know for myself that i am going to pay more attention to 'real' prog. Branch out of the trance genre and finally get to know others. Like Mike said, I'll stand and agree to disagree, this thread needs to go to rest, it's ended up going nowhere. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_Foyle if nothing else, this thread has inspired me to try hard to be unique as fuck in my next production. ill give you some "real progressive" |
| quote: |
| Orginally posted by Camwin Atleast this thread has brung some good humour and inspiration. I know for myself that i am going to pay more attention to 'real' prog. Branch out of the trance genre and finally get to know others. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian^ does that come with a markus schulz coldharbour remix ? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian^ does that come with a markus schulz coldharbour remix ? |
so is there any real prog out there that isn't so dark and bassy yet doesn't qualify as McProg?
I think a more melodic form of unformulaic music would be damn near perfect.
I disagree with the statement "Trance by nature is predictable." I think that the only rule of trance that is set in stone is that there must be hypnotic repititions. The rest of the stuff just happens among the biggest trance musicians, not because of the nature of trance but because of the nature of crowds, hype, and marketing.
It isnt fair to belittle all of trance for the things that not all trance is doing.
I guess you could say trance is predictable due to its repititions, because all repititions are predictable, but then I just wouldnt bother arguing anymore because real prog also revolves around repitition, so liking prog for its repititions and hating trance for being predicable would just mean that people prefer different kinds of repeating sounds and that is a matter of opinion.
If music that isnt repetitive is your measure of "objective quality" then I'll just go away to enjoy my predictable sounds without you.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian^ does that come with a markus schulz coldharbour remix ? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zombie0915 so is there any real prog out there that isn't so dark and bassy yet doesn't qualify as McProg? |
Airdrawndagger anyone? Ohmna? Xpander EP?
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.