TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- The most Gay Trance Trax
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »


Posted by SuperFarStucker on May-27-2003 03:44:

Confused

oh... wow...


Posted by refuge on May-27-2003 03:54:

the most recent 'sash' track with that fag boy george. the title is call run. if you see the video, you'll know exactly what i'm talking about. this track should be nominated as gayest track of the year.
peaC3
-reZ


Posted by DaveSZ on May-27-2003 04:12:

Behold, my arse.

I don't like to use this word to describe things that "suck," and actually it's a bit annoying. I will however this one time.






Soul on Soul, and Yet another day are some gayness to the max!!!!!!!!!1


[


OH, and the sig; Fucking hilarious. You crazy frenchies.


Posted by zarathustra on May-27-2003 04:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Christopher B
Jaimy and Kenny D - Caught Me Running (Tiesto Summerbreeze Mix)



VERY GAY


Posted by DaveSZ on May-27-2003 05:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Christopher B


Jaimy and Kenny D - Caught Me Running (Tiesto Summerbreeze Mix)




Ahhhhhhh. I really like the melody on that one, but yeah I can sae how the vocals might be considered "ghey."


Posted by Cobalt on May-27-2003 05:21:



...


Okay, fine. Soul on Soul takes the cake. The pink cake with lightly whipped raspberry frosting and adorable little caramel-glazed flower marshmellow candies. Now onto the centerpiece...


(Seriously though, some of you people are such immature homophobes if you think all gay people are like this.)

And Yet Another Day isn't "gay." It just sucks.


Posted by DJ Dingel on May-27-2003 05:49:

I'm so confused as to how some people are using the word gay and whether I should be offended or not.


Posted by trancedfarmer on May-27-2003 06:31:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Dingel
I'm so confused as to how some people are using the word gay and whether I should be offended or not.


yeah... im confused as to what this thread is about... are they coming out on TA or are they just mocking homosexuality!?! whatever...


Posted by Photo_bot_2k1 on May-27-2003 06:38:

Soul on soul is massively gay

I think you have to be wearing hotpants and thinking about penis JUST to listen to it at all


Posted by Steven Hays on May-27-2003 07:05:

okay, just have to say this:

Taking offense to these gay posts is fucking retarded. People, grow up and grow some balls, i get called so many names everyday, and vice versa, but I don't say, "oh my god, i'm so offended by that, i have no sac". Grow up people.

On the other note. Yet Another Day is not gay! Caught me Running is, definately, and soul on soul...LOL definately.

Sorry, if I offended anyone!

Steve


Posted by Trancemaster2k on May-27-2003 07:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Psychonoise
This sigs are a joke?


of course
beautiful sigs, isn't it?


Posted by Shito on May-27-2003 12:10:

No, these sigs are no jokes.
These are punishments!


Posted by chris_norris on May-27-2003 12:37:

what the fuck is going on in this thread? i havent got a clue what it's supposed to be about???


Posted by DJ Dingel on May-27-2003 16:38:

quote:
Originally posted by E\/AN AL|\/|AE
okay, just have to say this:

Taking offense to these gay posts is fucking retarded. People, grow up and grow some balls, i get called so many names everyday, and vice versa, but I don't say, "oh my god, i'm so offended by that, i have no sac". Grow up people.


Well, your "I have no sac" comment reveals your heterosexist/patriarchal inclinations to begin with, but I won't comment on that further.

There's a difference between being personally insulted (i.e. I'm perfectly willing to take a number of hits when I do something stupid and deserve to be mocked) and having your identity attacked. Calling stuff "gay" doesn't target an individual who has earned an insult (like calling someone a "fucking moron" when they are one), it instead attacks an entire segment of the population (and for that matter, one which is often treated like shit by many people).

So that explains my wariness of using the word gay as an insult.


Posted by SlinkySkev on May-27-2003 18:23:

BIG GAY.

Theres a track on John 00 Flemings "For your Ears Only" Mix which talks about a murderer. Its proper gay.


Posted by Prototrance on May-27-2003 18:24:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Dingel
Well, your "I have no sac" comment reveals your heterosexist/patriarchal inclinations to begin with, but I won't comment on that further.

Calling stuff "gay" doesn't target an individual who has earned an insult (like calling someone a "fucking moron" when they are one), it instead attacks an entire segment of the population (and for that matter, one which is often treated like shit by many people).


'Fucking gay moron' would suffice then. If fags 'come out' and act like pansies in public then they will attract ridicule, its the old paradigm of pointing out and taking the piss out of the unusual - or non-normal (if you can define normal). If they come out then they should be ready to accept ridicule, if they cant deal with it they should start shagging women as per the biological 'normal'.

Yes I'm a **** but I stand by what I say.


Posted by The Master on May-27-2003 19:03:

Pulsedriver Vs. George Kranz - Din Daa Daa


Posted by DJ Dingel on May-27-2003 19:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Prototrance
'Fucking gay moron' would suffice then. If fags 'come out' and act like pansies in public then they will attract ridicule, its the old paradigm of pointing out and taking the piss out of the unusual - or non-normal (if you can define normal). If they come out then they should be ready to accept ridicule, if they cant deal with it they should start shagging women as per the biological 'normal'.

Yes I'm a **** but I stand by what I say.


There is no biological normal. Throughout all of history, there's been a steady portion of the population (around 10%) that has been gay. It's not as if people invented homosexuality and chose to live that lifestyle, it's how they are.
If black people come out, they should be ready to accept ridicule, because they're the minority 13% of the population, right?


Posted by Psychonoise on May-27-2003 20:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Shito
No, these sigs are no jokes.
These are punishments!


True!!!ahuhauhauh


Posted by trancedfarmer on May-27-2003 21:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Prototrance
'Fucking gay moron' would suffice then. If fags 'come out' and act like pansies in public then they will attract ridicule, its the old paradigm of pointing out and taking the piss out of the unusual - or non-normal (if you can define normal). If they come out then they should be ready to accept ridicule, if they cant deal with it they should start shagging women as per the biological 'normal'.

Yes I'm a **** but I stand by what I say.


Its comments like that that make gay people want to stick rainbow stickers on their cars... but i dont fall for that shit! I just dance around out in public (as usual) like a fairy! I dont find what your saying offensive though, its just kinda silly...!


Posted by DaveSZ on May-27-2003 21:47:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Dingel
There is no biological normal. Throughout all of history, there's been a steady portion of the population (around 10%) that has been gay. It's not as if people invented homosexuality and chose to live that lifestyle, it's how they are.
If black people come out, they should be ready to accept ridicule, because they're the minority 13% of the population, right?


Black people don't need to "come out." It's obvious even to someone who can only see different tonalities (and not color) that they are 'black.'


Posted by Cobalt on May-27-2003 21:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Prototrance
'Fucking gay moron' would suffice then. If fags 'come out' and act like pansies in public then they will attract ridicule, its the old paradigm of pointing out and taking the piss out of the unusual - or non-normal (if you can define normal). If they come out then they should be ready to accept ridicule, if they cant deal with it they should start shagging women as per the biological 'normal'.


Such ignorance. Gay people don't "choose" their identity and can't "choose" to be straight. The evidence for this is flawless and ample. If you can't grasp that basic fact you don't have any room to talk.

Second, there are plenty of gay people who don't, as you so aptly put it, "act like pansies." That's an overblown stereotype that you've been force-fed because of the culture surrounding you. A similar perception surrounded the place of American women in the 1950s, the ostracism of colonial Quakers, and just about any other oppressed minority in history.


Posted by DJ Dingel on May-27-2003 22:01:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveSaenz
Black people don't need to "come out." It's obvious even to someone who can only see different tonalities (and not color) that they are 'black.'


I meant come out of their homes, but I neglected to remember what context I was speaking in.
If black people are going to be made fun of for being black, are they just supposed to hide from society?

P.S. Michael Jackson doesn't appear black to me, but he is. So maybe coming out is necessary. :-P


Posted by davinox on May-27-2003 22:27:

anyone with an education knows that homosexuality is natural.

many species of animals engage in it, and humans have been for all of history.

i think the Velvet Morning singer sounds pretty gay, its a great song though.


Posted by intrinsic on May-28-2003 00:19:

rofl at that signature


Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.